BringBackOrton Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 1 minute ago, Domdab99 said: Again, We don't know if Watson or Mahomes are going to be long-term solutions at QB yet. They look good, but who knows? And yes, I'd certainly like to be in the Eagles' shoes. It must be nice to win a SB. But I really don't think they won because they traded up for Wentz. Like you said, the rest of the team was good, too. All OP is saying that the stats clearly say DON'T TRADE UP FOR A QB. Recent history excepted, of course. It's not a clear cut decision. I want a QB as bad as you, I just don't want to give aw the farm to do it. OMG. What QB would've gone 11-2 as a starter for them for most of the year? You have to give away the farm or you won't get the best QB prospect. This simple fact cannot be disregarded.
Lfod Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 (edited) I would put myself into the reluctant to trade up category. The team says it now wants to build through the draft and in time I will learn what that means to them. I'm under the impression there probably won't be any mayjor trade up unless it's very convenient for the Bills. I just don't think you can build through the draft if you spend all your capital on one guy. I'm not against moving up for a QB if you really feel he will be elite. I also am not against trading into a better position for a QB next year if it made more sense. I'll find out soon enough but I just don't see them trading up for a QB. I think they let the draft fall to them. I don't think they will reach. I think they will draft a QB at the appropriate time and hope they hit. Edited March 3, 2018 by Lfod
Domdab99 Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 9 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: OMG. What QB would've gone 11-2 as a starter for them for most of the year? You have to give away the farm or you won't get the best QB prospect. This simple fact cannot be disregarded. That simple fact would be wrong 8/10 times. But you do you, Dude.
BringBackOrton Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Domdab99 said: That simple fact would be wrong 8/10 times. But you do you, Dude. You'd be even more wrong waiting. But let's hope we get our chance at the next Brandon Weeden or Paxton Lynch. Edited March 3, 2018 by jmc12290
billsredneck1 Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 (edited) i know this will get flamed and any one could come up with a million scenarios, and though i shudder at the thought of trading up, we have to have a franchise qb so.... i would trade 21, a 2nd , next year's 1st and tt to cleveland for the 4 spot and draft mayfield. this is assuming darnold and rosen are gone. tt would be a good bridge for them to at least be able to go .500 or better in their division...which should be their no. 1 goal. i would also consider this same deal and scenario with denver for no. 5 assuming cousins lands elsewhere. i can see denver looking to draft allen later in the 1st. my ideal situation would be foles or mc carron and have all our picks but.... Edited March 3, 2018 by billsredneck1
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 32 minutes ago, Domdab99 said: Again, We don't know if Watson or Mahomes are going to be long-term solutions at QB yet. They look good, but who knows? And yes, I'd certainly like to be in the Eagles' shoes. It must be nice to win a SB. But I really don't think they won because they traded up for Wentz. Like you said, the rest of the team was good, too. All OP is saying that the stats clearly say DON'T TRADE UP FOR A QB. Recent history excepted, of course. It's not a clear cut decision. I want a QB as bad as you, I just don't want to give aw the farm to do it. when you have gone 22 years without a franchise QB, you give away the farm. period.
ColoradoBills Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 2 hours ago, JMF2006 said: One missed swing for the fences one year into the new regime could define their tenure. 2 hours ago, MAJBobby said: Just like sitting on their hands can. Then again they are ultra conservative sooooo 1 hour ago, NoSaint said: I’d rather they get fired trying to get a star qb than be 7 years in and .500 with 3 wildcard games and 1 playoff win These 3 posts tell the whole story. Beane and McDermott have waited their whole careers to get to this spot. WHAT will THEY do? I truly believe they would love to move up and get "their guy". Winning 2-3 games more than expected has made this much harder. The extra 1st from KC is definitely in the mix because that's what they traded it for! That's 1580 draft points and with a premium gets you to about 8. They easily could decide to use their 2nd 2nd which makes 1930 points. With a premium gets you to about 5. 2 less wins would of had the Bills pick around 13 or so. With that it would just about get them to #2. But that didn't happen, we made the Playoffs! For Beane to move higher than 5 or so becomes problematic. The risk/reward get exponentially higher and no one knows if he is willing to risk that. So a lot has to do with FA QB results and how these QB's grade out in the next few weeks. We got to wait to see what he will do. I hope he finds someone to trade with to get someone he wants! I've spent a lot of time in Vegas and one thing is for certain................... the best "gamblers" do not go to Vegas for a weekend and put everything they got on one hand of blackjack. FWIW 1
LABILLBACKER Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 7 hours ago, CajunBillsBacker said: Regardless of past draft stats, if there’s a QB that McBeane likes, then they have to do what it takes to get him. Right now, both the Jets and Dolphins are thinking franchise QB, and if not this year, soon the Patriots will be looking for Brady’s successor. The division is about to go through a transition and we have to do what it takes to beat them to the punch. Now that all depends on who they fall in love with. That just may be Jackson and Rudolph, who knows. But if it’s Rosen, Darnold, or Mayfield, we have to jump the gun. I couldn't agree more. With Tom Brady being on the cusp of retirement it is imperative that we find this QB within the next 2 years, and no later than that. if the scouts and the GM feel strongly about one quarterback they have to go for it. If not use your existing pics and build the team as strong as you can, and take a quarterback at 21 or in the 2nd round.
ndirish1978 Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 (edited) This list is the ultimate form of confirmation bias. You offer these vague and ambiguous categories defined by your unqualified opinion. Then to top it off you make an absolute statement that teams should NEVER trade up. Carson Wentz was a trade up and his was a success, so your premise is immediately disproved, as your absolute statement has already failed. Edited March 3, 2018 by ndirish1978 1
Lurker Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 Love this line: https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2017/4/18/15340020/buffalo-bills-nfl-draft-mitchell-trubisky-nfl-history-trading-up-franchise-quarterback "Going back to the merger in 1970, a trade into the top ten for a QB has happened twelve times. Two of those quarterbacks won a playoff game with the team that drafted them. Three have spent time in prison."
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 27 minutes ago, K-9 said: Gotta be in it to to win it. It really is that simple isn't it.
JohnC Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 9 hours ago, cage said: With all the talk of trading up I thought I would take a look at how well teams pick at the top half of the draft. I looked at just the top 15 pics over a decade 2005-2015 (11 years). I graded each pick as HIT / SO-SO / BUST. I defined HIT as someone who had their 5th year option picked up, was re-signed by team drafting them or signed a big FA contract once their rookie deal was up. For those still on their rookie contract they had to be full-time starters from year 1 and made the Pro-bowl. That's what you'd expect from a top 15 pick. Here are the results by position: Position Hit So-so Bust QB 26% 32% 42% RB 31% 38% 31% WR 39% 17% 44% OL 38% 38% 24% DL 43% 26% 31% LB 57% 17% 26% DB 33% 38% 29% Offense 34% 32% 34% Defense 44% 27% 29% Total 39% 29% 32% Other than at LB the drafting success of the entire league scouting system for the top 15 picks of the draft is less than a coin flip. These should be the most sure-fire perennial Pro Bowlers. If the league's collective wisdom can't be above 50% with these pics, why would you ever trade up? Much less, for a QB, which is the worst performing position. I further looked at QBs in just the top 5 in the same period. The HIT rate "rises" to 38%,... certainly uninspiring. With at least 4 QBs projected in the top 15 pics, we should expect that at least 2 of them will be BUSTs. Ask the Rams and the Eagles if they regret trading picks to move up for their respective qbs. The Bills haven't had a franchise qb for almost a quarter century. Being passive is a formula for maintaining the status quo. Paralysis by over analysis can be crippling! I appreciate your effort but I'm not buying what you are selling.
Reed83HOF Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 15 minutes ago, JohnC said: Ask the Rams and the Eagles if they regret trading picks to move up for their respective qbs. The Bills haven't had a franchise qb for almost a quarter century. Being passive is a formula for maintaining the status quo. Sigh
ColoradoBills Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 22 minutes ago, Lurker said: Love this line: https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2017/4/18/15340020/buffalo-bills-nfl-draft-mitchell-trubisky-nfl-history-trading-up-franchise-quarterback "Going back to the merger in 1970, a trade into the top ten for a QB has happened twelve times. Two of those quarterbacks won a playoff game with the team that drafted them. Three have spent time in prison." that's funny. 1
SouthNYfan Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 53 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said: These 3 posts tell the whole story. Beane and McDermott have waited their whole careers to get to this spot. WHAT will THEY do? I truly believe they would love to move up and get "their guy". Winning 2-3 games more than expected has made this much harder. The extra 1st from KC is definitely in the mix because that's what they traded it for! That's 1580 draft points and with a premium gets you to about 8. They easily could decide to use their 2nd 2nd which makes 1930 points. With a premium gets you to about 5. 2 less wins would of had the Bills pick around 13 or so. With that it would just about get them to #2. But that didn't happen, we made the Playoffs! For Beane to move higher than 5 or so becomes problematic. The risk/reward get exponentially higher and no one knows if he is willing to risk that. So a lot has to do with FA QB results and how these QB's grade out in the next few weeks. We got to wait to see what he will do. I hope he finds someone to trade with to get someone he wants! I've spent a lot of time in Vegas and one thing is for certain................... the best "gamblers" do not go to Vegas for a weekend and put everything they got on one hand of blackjack. FWIW Agree your post. Pretty much spot on, other than the bold, I'd also like to add that those best "gamblers" also play multiple hands, and also do go "all in" if they feel they are sure about something. Sometimes they hit big on the river with an "all in" hope and prayer, but usually they have calculated the odds before they do so. In regards to playing multiple hands, the Bills haven't done that in a while. We love to pass on QBs. Can't win if you aren't in the game, right? I don't advocate betting the farm in panic, but if they love a guy enough, I'm okay with them betting the farm, the car, and the rent check 1
ColoradoBills Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said: Agree your post. Pretty much spot on, other than the bold, I'd also like to add that those best "gamblers" also play multiple hands, and also do go "all in" if they feel they are sure about something. Sometimes they hit big on the river with an "all in" hope and prayer, but usually they have calculated the odds before they do so. In regards to playing multiple hands, the Bills haven't done that in a while. We love to pass on QBs. Can't win if you aren't in the game, right? I don't advocate betting the farm in panic, but if they love a guy enough, I'm okay with them betting the farm, the car, and the rent check Thanks. Blackjack and Hold'em are definitely 2 different games. LOL I noticed how you said your "okay with THEM betting the farm, the car, and the rent check", and that is what I'm talking about. It's their lives and careers on the line. The 2 games of chance is really a good analogy. Is Beane a Hold'em player or a Blackjack player? Definitely 2 different kinds of gamblers. 1
John from Riverside Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 The problem with all this is we have basically tried everything BUT selling out for a QB Lets try it
NoSaint Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Domdab99 said: Again, We don't know if Watson or Mahomes are going to be long-term solutions at QB yet. They look good, but who knows? And yes, I'd certainly like to be in the Eagles' shoes. It must be nice to win a SB. But I really don't think they won because they traded up for Wentz. Like you said, the rest of the team was good, too. All OP is saying that the stats clearly say DON'T TRADE UP FOR A QB. Recent history excepted, of course. It's not a clear cut decision. I want a QB as bad as you, I just don't want to give away the farm to do it. If we trade up to 17 for a project I’ll be less excited than if we go up for a top prospect its its hard to lump those two situations together for your argument Edited March 3, 2018 by NoSaint
K-9 Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 40 minutes ago, horned dogs said: It really is that simple isn't it. When it comes to getting a player you’ve identified as a blue chip, can’t miss, franchise-turning-around, perennial All Pro? Yeah, it’s that simple.
Recommended Posts