Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 7:29 PM, Chicken Boo said:

 

If I were the Browns, I'd sign Cousins, draft Barkely at #1 and Minkah at #4.

Expand  

 

They should take Nelson and give themselves an All Pro RG for Barkley to run behind. 

 

Cousins, Barkley and Josh Gordon would form a pretty formidable offensive attack. 

 

Then use the rest of the picks upgrading the defense. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 7:37 PM, Pete said:

Nick Chubb started over Todd Gurley.  Then he suffered a devastating knee injury.  He worked back from that is one of top backs in this class.  Nick would make an excellent Bill

Expand  

 

 

Umm, no, he did not start over Gurley.  2014 was their only year on campus together.  Gurley was the clear back the first 5 games the year (Marshall / Chubb / Michel split time as backups) before being declared ineligible by the NCAA in game 6.  Gurley was suspended 4 games, then got hurt against Auburn when he came back.

Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 7:37 PM, Pete said:

yes QB is most important position- but think teams way over pay for their lottery ticket at QB.  I am more thrifty then that.  My mantra is I would rather the Bills would be the 2000 Ravens with Trent Dilfer or the 1985 Bears with Jim McMahon then the 2014 Colts with Andrew Luck

Nick Chubb started over Todd Gurley.  Then he suffered a devastating knee injury.  He worked back from that is one of top backs in this class.  Nick would make an excellent Bill

Expand  

 

Best of luck building an all time defense.

Posted

If we want to trade up with the Giants, it may be in our best interest for Barkley to go #1.  Given their clear need at the position and wanting to make life easier on Eli, I just can't see them passing him up.  If he's gone #1, they are basically picking between a guard (a position they could use, but still, a guard #2) / a DE (a position they don't really need with JPP / Vernon) / a QB who'll sit for a couple of years / DB (another non-need position unless they are punting on Apple already) or a trade down.

Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 8:04 PM, Pete said:

best of luck finding aaron rogers or tom brady,  I like my odds better

Expand  

 

Really? You like the odds of finding 11 guys, paying them all and keeping them together long term until you luck out in the playoffs better than finding ONE guy?

 

Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 8:06 PM, joesixpack said:

 

Really? You like the odds of finding 11 guys, paying them all and keeping them together long term until you luck out in the playoffs better than finding ONE guy?

 

Expand  

 

It may depend on if that ONE guy you’re trying to find is wearing a red and white striped shirt. That can make it a lot easier. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 8:17 PM, Augie said:

 

It may depend on if that ONE guy you’re trying to find is wearing a red and white striped shirt. That can make it a lot easier. 

Expand  

 

"Waldo drops back to pass, the pocket collapses around him, and -- wait... where did he go? Again?!"

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 7:37 PM, Pete said:

Nick Chubb started over Todd Gurley.  Then he suffered a devastating knee injury.  He worked back from that is one of top backs in this class.  Nick would make an excellent Bill

Expand  

Yes. When Gurley was hurt.

 

Otherwise no. No he didn’t.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 8:06 PM, joesixpack said:

 

Really? You like the odds of finding 11 guys, paying them all and keeping them together long term until you luck out in the playoffs better than finding ONE guy?

 

Expand  

I like my odds on drafting great players with 11 picks then 1

Posted (edited)

questionable? Have you ever taken a Stats class?  A sample size of 11 provides a better chance, then a sample size of 1.  My point is keep the picks, and add more if you can.  It will be better for the BIlls in the long run with probability 

Edited by Pete
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/2/2018 at 9:50 PM, Pete said:

questionable? Have you ever taken a Stats class?  A sample size of 11 provides a better chance, then a sample size of 1.  My point is keep the picks, and add more if you can.  It will be better for the BIlls in the long run with probability 

Expand  

 

Yes, but if your theory is you're gonna win with trent dilfer, you need to hit on 11/11 defensive picks. Again, good luck.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...