Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

But yet there are fans happy about giving him 6mill of our cap space in the hope we can get a 5th pr 6th rd pick? A. Who will trade for Tyrod?  B. Is a late pick worth 6 mill in cap?  C. Why not just move on as we should?

 

These stats are flat out pathetic.

 

A - Probably teams who have been really bad for a while now, or someone who has a young QB and no viable backup.  The team's he's played on have won more games than they have lost, and they didn't exactly have all-pro receivers and linemen.  

B - If we don't plan to use the cap space, maybe?  It also functions as a protection should we not be able to sign anyone pre-draft.

c - Going into the draft with nate peterman at QB will make it patently obvious what we plan to do with the 21/22 picks.  

Posted (edited)

not only did a team say "make him play QB," it was the team he was on for a number of years as a backup.

 

Nice guy, maybe the perfect backup but he'll never accept that role (and corresponding salary) now.

Edited by TheFunPolice
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

not only did a team say "make him play QB," it was the team he was on for a number of years as a backup.

 

Nice guy, maybe the perfect backup but he'll never accept that role (and corresponding salary) now.

 

He'd be overpaid as a backup... but after watching the following people play football, i don't even think its always a bad decision to pay a fair amount for a backup

 

Savage

Simien

Hundley

Beathard

Fitz

Osweiler

Gabbert

Stanton

Moore

Petty

Yates

Hogan

Kizer

Lynch

Manuel

Fales

Glennon

Brisset

Cassel

 

I mean - Arizona and denver don't even have QBs.  We saw what happened when Watson went down.  I'm sure Ravens fans would love to trot ryan mallet out again.  Or for the packers/colts to have to lose a whole season because they can't win a game under Hundley/brisset.  Especially after watching minnesota and philly ride their backups to the playoffs.  

Edited by dneveu
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

not only did a team say "make him play QB," it was the team he was on for a number of years as a backup.

 

Nice guy, maybe the perfect backup but he'll never accept that role (and corresponding salary) now.

 

He will in a year or so, but only with another team... Obviously Peterman was horrible, but imagine the conversation if he had played decent-great? Instead of Tyrod being mentioned as a marginal starter, he would be seen as a decent backup.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Lurker said:

Curious to know the numerator and denominator on that 7.0% stat...

4 max (per ESPN's splits for '4th Q +/-7 pts). Which would mean over the past 3 years he's thrown 57 total passes while down by 8+ in the 4th.

Posted
2 hours ago, TheTruthHurts said:

This isn't a positive Taylor thread. You can calm down. 

 

He's kinda testy... plus he evidently has reading comprehension and communication issues.

 

But he's a helluva poster... I mean DAMMMNNNN!!!!  Look at that rep!!!  :lol:

Posted

The Jaguars game was one of the worst QB performances I've seen in a long time.  The Saints game was up there too.  The Panthers game was right there.  There's just too many games where Tyrod totally fails.  It's very obvious to anybody with 2 objective eyeballs, that he is nothing more than a slightly below avg. bridge QB.

 

Man I just started thinking about that Panthers game.....boy was that painful.

Posted
1 hour ago, Pbomb said:

 

Some more good numbers for tyrod

And people are still OK with one more year since you cant find anything better in FA, according to them......I would rather see what Peterman can do than sit through another year of TT......

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

It was on about half hour ago. They were all sitting on a nyc bench eating slices. She folded hers up and went to town.

I'd like to open her up and go to town lol

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Estro said:

The Jaguars game was one of the worst QB performances I've seen in a long time.  The Saints game was up there too.  The Panthers game was right there.  There's just too many games where Tyrod totally fails.  It's very obvious to anybody with 2 objective eyeballs, that he is nothing more than a slightly below avg. bridge QB.

 

Man I just started thinking about that Panthers game.....boy was that painful.

 

I mean... the worst QB performance I've EVER seen at ANY level... was against the Chargers.

29 minutes ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:

And people are still OK with one more year since you cant find anything better in FA, according to them......I would rather see what Peterman can do than sit through another year of TT......

 

I'm sure there's someone else... right?  I'd rather have Gabbert than peterman starting.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Lurker said:

Curious to know the numerator and denominator on that 7.0% stat...

I think I've got it reverse engineered at this point. When the Bills are trailing by 8 or fewer points in the 4th Quarter, Tyrod is:

38/71 for 455 yards, 3 TDs and 5 INTs. He's taken 7 sacks, and he's converted 19 1st downs.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

I mean... the worst QB performance I've EVER seen at ANY level... was against the Chargers.

 

I'm sure there's someone else... right?  I'd rather have Gabbert than peterman starting.

Peterman is still unknown, played much better in the snow, Gabbert has run his course.....

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Pbomb said:

 

Some more good numbers for tyrod

Boggles my mind that people still support and want this guy as QB or say it can get worse. 

 

Some of the armchair QBs that support TT here really need to second guess their football acumen because it stinks. 

×
×
  • Create New...