Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sign me up for Case!  The guy basically made Adam Thielen a star, and he would have had an even bigger year with a healthy Delvin Cook.  I liked what I saw last year.

 

I don't think he is going to demand a huge Cousins type contract.  And instead of packaging picks to move up for an unknown, we can use those picks to fix the front 7 and maybe add a WR.  Add in free agency and we could compete with Keenum.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, SWATeam said:

Sign me up for Case!  The guy basically made Adam Thielen a star, and he would have had an even bigger year with a healthy Delvin Cook.  I liked what I saw last year.

 

I don't think he is going to demand a huge Cousins type contract.  And instead of packaging picks to move up for an unknown, we can use those picks to fix the front 7 and maybe add a WR.  Add in free agency and we could compete with Keenum.

 

I believe the exact opposite with Thielen, Diggs, Rudolph, and the coaching/system of Shurmur making him successful.  He's a journeyman who had a good year IMO. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I honestly cannot recall a year when there were so many QBs in the mix between the Draft and Free Agency. I love reading all of these posts from people who say 'absolutely not' to each new name thrown out there for consideration...and yet I don't know of anyone who's looking forward to seeing Tyrod in a Bills uniform in 2018.  Something has to give!   The one thing I definitely don't see happening is the Bills giving up a ton of picks to move way up in the Draft.  I really don't think Beane or Coach McD are the big splash, riverboat gambler sort of tandem.

Posted
13 minutes ago, NewEra said:

The Vikings have Barr, Kendrick’s and Danielle Hunter coming up for free agency after the season. Maybe they draft a couple replacements this year, but they’ve been the strength of that team imo.  I could see them wading into the cousins water, but not sure if paying a decent qb 30 mil a year is the right move for them.  I think they love Teddy and will offer him a pretty cheap contract to be the starter while they draft someone to groom.  But I’m the guy laying on the beach writing on a message board.  

Humble Brag alert! 

Posted

DeFelippo could mean they go with Bradford. It could also mean Cousins as DeFelippo has seen him up close a lot in the NFC East.

 

I don't think they will feel like Keenum is the guy.  

Posted
23 minutes ago, NewEra said:

The Vikings have Barr, Kendrick’s and Danielle Hunter coming up for free agency after the season. Maybe they draft a couple replacements this year, but they’ve been the strength of that team imo.  I could see them wading into the cousins water, but not sure if paying a decent qb 30 mil a year is the right move for them.  I think they love Teddy and will offer him a pretty cheap contract to be the starter while they draft someone to groom.  But I’m the guy laying on the beach writing on a message board.  

Why would a starting QB take a cheap contract?

Posted
9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I honestly cannot recall a year when there were so many QBs in the mix between the Draft and Free Agency. I love reading all of these posts from people who say 'absolutely not' to each new name thrown out there for consideration...and yet I don't know of anyone who's looking forward to seeing Tyrod in a Bills uniform in 2018.  Something has to give!   The one thing I definitely don't see happening is the Bills giving up a ton of picks to move way up in the Draft.  I really don't think Beane or Coach McD are the big splash, riverboat gambler sort of tandem.

 

With all of the options available in free agency, the cost to move up could technically be cheaper. I think they made the trade down last year with the specific intent of trading up this year. I don't think they anticipated making the playoffs, which makes the trade up more difficult. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

NAME

ATT COMP PCT YDS AVG YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Case Keenum 481 325 67.6 3547 7.4 227.4 65 22 4.6 7 1.5 22 136 98.3

 

 

NAME ATT COMP PCT YDS AVG YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Tyrod Taylor 420 263 62.6 2799 6.7 169.5 47 14 3.3 4 1.0 46 256

89.2

 

 

It is confusing to figure this stuff out because statistically at least Keenum had a much better year than Taylor did.

And the Vikes went 13-3 and won the division and a playoff game. Versus the Bills 9-8 and a loss in the wild card game..

 

 

I know the Vikes have better receivers but is it that clear cut that Keenum isn't any better than Taylor?

Posted (edited)

I don't believe this hurts the Bills because Minnesota isn't going to sign Cousins. Not buying they are going to tie up half their cap space with the guys they have coming up after 2018. AJ McCarron makes more sense.

Edited by horned dogs
Posted
3 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

 

 

NAME

ATT COMP PCT YDS AVG YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Case Keenum 481 325 67.6 3547 7.4 227.4 65 22 4.6 7 1.5 22 136 98.3

 

 

NAME ATT COMP PCT YDS AVG YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Tyrod Taylor 420 263 62.6 2799 6.7 169.5 47 14 3.3 4 1.0 46 256

89.2

 

 

It is confusing to figure this stuff out because statistically at least Keenum had a much better year than Taylor did.

And the Vikes went 13-3 and won the division and a playoff game. Versus the Bills 9-8 and a loss in the wild card game..

 

 

I know the Vikes have better receivers but is it that clear cut that Keenum isn't any better than Taylor?

 

I think they are very similar. I argued that last offseason when Keenum had been less successful in LA and I will argue it this offseason too.  I like Case Keenum I think like Tyrod he is one of the best 32 Quarterbacks in the league... but I also think like Tyrod I don't see much that makes me want to say "he is my guy for the next 5 years" and that means those guys live a slightly precarious existence.  Last year when he was cheap I was in favour of Keenum.  This year when he will overpriced I am not.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, horned dogs said:

I don't believe this hurts the Bills because Minnesota isn't going to sign Cousins. Not buying they are going to tie up half their cap space with the guys they have coming up after 2018. AJ McCarron makes more sense.

 

MIN is the perfect scenario for Cousins: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/kirk-cousins-rumors-vikings-have-mutual-interest-looking-at-a-possible-broncos-deal/

 

The Vikings are in a fascinating situation, because they have a trio of free-agent quarterbacks in Case KeenumSam Bradford and Teddy Bridgewater. In other words, they have three quarterbacks, but they don't really have any quarterbacks. And it sounds like they may ultimately decide not to place the franchise tag on Keenum.

Which would put them squarely in the Cousins sweepstakes. And, unlike anyone else, the Vikings can offer Cousins what few other NFL teams can: a viable chance to win a Super Bowl. The Broncos can be contenders if they land Cousins and if they are able to retain the offensive and defensive pieces necessary to compete. 

The Vikings don't need to do anything. They have Stefon DiggsAdam ThielenKyle Rudolph and Dalvin Cook in place on offense. The defense is built to be dominant for the next few years. The Vikings will compete for the Super Bowl with a decent quarterback, and Cousins would give them a top-tier options.

Benefiting Minnesota -- and Denver -- is the notion that Cousins already made a lot of money and stands to make a lot of money moving forward regardless of where he plays. Cousins has pointed out it's important for him to be happy and to win. It might mean he ends up taking a little bit less to try and push Minnesota over the top.

Posted
7 minutes ago, horned dogs said:

I don't believe this hurts the Bills because Minnesota isn't going to sign Cousins. Not buying they are going to tie up half their cap space with the guys they have coming up after 2018. AJ McCarron makes more sense.

They have already been rumored to be interested in McCarron, and I think it makes a lot of sense. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Remember that in addition to paying (and in this case likely over-paying) for a veteran QB, the Bills would also be on tab for some of Tyrod's money both in terms of real $ (if we believe that they intend to pay him the $6 M bonus that is coming up) as well as cap space if he is traded/cut.

 

That is why I think it is highly unlikely that the Bills will pay big $ for a UFA QB this year.

 

I believe that they are planning on going all in on drafting a rookie QB this year.

 

If they manage to get the guy they really want at the top of the draft (Rosen/Mayfiled/Darnold), then Tyrod may not even be on the roster on Opening Day.

 

If they have to settle for a Jackson/Rudolph type, then Tyrod serves as a bridge until the new QB is ready. Given the quick hook to Peterman in the midst of last season's playoff run, that could even come early in 2018.

Posted
2 minutes ago, 2003Contenders said:

Remember that in addition to paying (and in this case likely over-paying) for a veteran QB, the Bills would also be on tab for some of Tyrod's money both in terms of real $ (if we believe that they intend to pay him the $6 M bonus that is coming up) as well as cap space if he is traded/cut.

 

That is why I think it is highly unlikely that the Bills will pay big $ for a UFA QB this year.

 

I believe that they are planning on going all in on drafting a rookie QB this year.

 

If they manage to get the guy they really want at the top of the draft (Rosen/Mayfiled/Darnold), then Tyrod may not even be on the roster on Opening Day.

 

If they have to settle for a Jackson/Rudolph type, then Tyrod serves as a bridge until the new QB is ready. Given the quick hook to Peterman in the midst of last season's playoff run, that could even come early in 2018.

They will have to either sign a QB in FA, Trade for one, or keep Tyrod in addition to drafting one. I cannot see them going into the season with a rookie and Peterman as the only QBs. 

Posted
1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I say no to any equation with Peterman in it. 

 

THIS - This and THIS!  I pray I am wrong but it sure doesn't look like Peterman is leaving any high level meetings and playing like his hair is on fire - that is unless you count passes to the other team.....THEN his hair is on fire!

Posted
46 minutes ago, nucci said:

Why would a starting QB take a cheap contract?

 CHeap relative to Case and cousins.  How much do you think Teddy is going to get on the open market.He’s not getting over over 20 mill per after not playing for 2 years. He may take a discount if the Vikes offer him the starting job and 30 mill guaranteed. Makes him a 2 year starter at 15 mill per.  Very reasonable and considered cheap for a starting qb.  

Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

This is not surprising considering Zimmer couldn’t even commit to him as a starter on a week to week basis. He’s a high end backup who had a nice year. 

I think they will keep Teddy and trade for Foles or sign mccarron.

 

 

Why would the lose Keenum for McCarron?

 

I don't get the McCarron....

×
×
  • Create New...