TigerJ Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 As I read Rappaport's tweets, what I am reading is that #1. the Bills are not satisfied with just letting Tyrod become a free agent. #2. once they pay his bonus they will retain two options - keep him or trade him. The are willing to do either depending on how the trade market looks. The bonus, being a bonus will count against the Bills' salary cap in any case, but because it is a bonus, it makes the remainder of Tyrod's compensation much more palatable to any potential trading partner. In simple terms, Tyrod becomes much more tradeable if the pay him his bonus. No other team is going to trade with Buffalo for Tyrod now because they don't want to deal with the bonus. The downside of this notion, of course, is that it increases Buffalo's already high dead cap number. They do have room to absorb it, and that dead cap money all disappears next year. Obviously, the Bills will draft a QB this spring, but it may not be Darnold, Rosen, Allen or Mayfield. 2 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 7 hours ago, John from Hemet said: I guess you have never heard me say that wins/losses are a team stat I guess Isn't that my job? Kind of like DC Tom, only different "Wins and Losses are a Team Stat. Wins and Losses are a Team Stat!" 30 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: A lot of fans just like to blame Tyrod for pretty much everything that was wrong with the offense last season... when in reality the OC was awful, the WR corps was awful and the offensive line regressed. Not many if any QBs would function very well in those conditions. Tyrod isn't Eli Manning, but just a year ago Eli was among the best in the league. This past season with an awful offensive line, depleted recieving corps and just plain bad coaching he sucked. Go figure. And, in a surprise to no one, a bunch of folks are talking about how Eli is all washed up (he got benched!) and the Giants are ready to take a QB at #2 and Move On. The Giants may or may not draft a QB at #2, depending upon how they personally evaluate the physical and mental makeup of these QB. But my guess is that given an infusion of talent at OL, RB, and WR the demise of Eli Manning will be seen as prematurely predicted.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 38 minutes ago, TigerJ said: As I read Rappaport's tweets, what I am reading is that #1. the Bills are not satisfied with just letting Tyrod become a free agent. #2. once they pay his bonus they will retain two options - keep him or trade him. The are willing to do either depending on how the trade market looks. The bonus, being a bonus will count against the Bills' salary cap in any case, but because it is a bonus, it makes the remainder of Tyrod's compensation much more palatable to any potential trading partner. In simple terms, Tyrod becomes much more tradeable if the pay him his bonus. No other team is going to trade with Buffalo for Tyrod now because they don't want to deal with the bonus. The downside of this notion, of course, is that it increases Buffalo's already high dead cap number. They do have room to absorb it, and that dead cap money all disappears next year. Obviously, the Bills will draft a QB this spring, but it may not be Darnold, Rosen, Allen or Mayfield. Not just depending upon how the trade market looks - depending upon other options in FA and what happens in the draft. Of course, those things will also influence the trade market.
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 8 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: So they want to pay the bonus to make it easier to trade? Paying 6mil to get a 5th rd pk isn't that cost prohibitive.
purple haze Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 8 hours ago, NewDayBills said: I'm okay with Jackson at 21 and I'm okay with Tyrod in Buffalo another year. As much as I want Cousins or Keenum, not a chance that happens, we don't have the cap room to make that happen, so why dump our starting QB? Cap can be manipulated to do what teams need it to do. If they want Cousins and Cousins wants the process, they can make it happen. big bonus this season, low salary. Salary bumps up significantly next season when Bills will have 80+ million to spend (if reports are accurate).
purple haze Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) 8 hours ago, SoTier said: IMO, this should actually make the "draft a QB" crowd very happy. If true, it seems a pretty strong indication that the Bills aren't going to pursue Cousins as a long term starter and are going to draft a QB. Not necessarily. It tells me that we will know day one of FA if they will pick up that six million. If they're in on Cousins it will happen day 1 of FA. And I do believe Cousins will be a pursuit (Not saying they will get him). At that point they would let Tyrod walk. But if they don't get Cousins Tyrod is still in their hip pocket and they can give him his 6 mil and play the waiting game. Edited February 23, 2018 by purple haze
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 3 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Do they do a lot of surgeries on rockets? Not taking a QB in this class would be a mistake imo. If we don't, there's many free agents and possible trade targets (Foles) out their that would be an upgrade over Taylor. I absolutely want us to draft a QB! We should be drafting a QB in the first 3 rounds every few years when one we like falls to us - regardless of whether we need one. We should be so much the more drafting QB when we have a known need! Foles may be an upgrade on Taylor. If we don't give him a better OL, amazing WR, and a coach who can and will game-plan to his strengths and work on his weaknesses, we might just be surprised to find how little an upgrade he is. Could be a downgrade, even! Same goes for Keenum. As far as "many", every time I ask folks for a list, they come up with QB one bathmat or hit away from life with a cane (Bridgewater, Bradford), QB who are complete or almost complete dark horses (AJ McCarron with his 3 games at a mighty 185 ypg, throwing to Green and Sanu), or greybeards like Moore and McCown. Color me unpersuaded on the available evidence. As for rocket surgery, not too often, but when it's needed, it's needed. Check this out: http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/22467698/how-kinston-north-carolina-became-greatest-producer-nba-talent-america 1
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 9 hours ago, NoSaint said: Makes more sense than 2-3 years of Bradford at a big deal, Tyrods dead money on top and a rookie unless you are getting something for Tyrod— the 1 year contract and lack of dead money put him ahead the other guys that aren’t much better (if at all) This is just great Tyrod will be the mentor for our next QB which will most likely be a pocket passer. Tyrod the mentor of passers. Lol. Just great I'm so excited. Maybe he can teach him to run after 1 read. Tuck and run make sure u don't throw the ball into windows u don't want to throw pks make sure u punt that's much better for us. 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, NastyNateSoldiers said: This is just great Tyrod will be the mentor for our next QB which will most likely be a pocket passer. Tyrod the mentor of passers. Lol. Just great I'm so excited. Maybe he can teach him to run after 1 read. Tuck and run make sure u don't throw the ball into windows u don't want to throw pks make sure u punt that's much better for us. I could be mistaken, but I had the impression that on a well-run team (*cough* Eagles *cough*), the QB coach is the one teaching the QB the game as he wants it played, and the "mentoring" aspect is more along the lines of work ethic, the amount and type of preparation to put in pre-meetings, how to "get right" after a game and so forth. I mean, the knock on Foles was that he bails out of the pocket when you pressure him and doesn't progress in his reads, so he surely wasn't teaching Wentz those things. They were both learning. If we're expecting our vet QB to be coaching our rookie, then maybe that's our problem and we need to draft a better QB coach. Edited February 23, 2018 by Hapless Bills Fan 2 1
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: I could be mistaken, but I had the impression that on a well-run team (*cough* Eagles *cough*), the QB coach is the one teaching the QB the game as he wants it played, and the "mentoring" aspect is more along the lines of work ethic, the amount and type of preparation to put in pre-meetings, how to "get right" after a game and so forth. I mean, the knock on Foles was that he bails out of the pocket when you pressure him and doesn't progress in his reads, so he surely wasn't teaching Wentz those things. They were both learning. If we're expecting our vet QB to be coaching our rookie, then maybe that's our problem and we need to draft a better QB coach. Our QB coach is a career 35yrs wrs coach. So maybe Tyrod will be his QB coach it seems like he's more qualified at this pt. Btw the bridge QB is the mentor and will not teach him how to play QB but give him advise to what he does in certain situations. So tuck and run baby don't throw into windows and be ultra conservative. Make sure we turn it over the natural way by punting that's what i would do. That's the Tyrod way.
Alphadawg7 Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: Oh no..........guys like Bradford and Keenum will surely take a one year deal to be a bridge for a QB the Buffalo Bills just traded up for. These aren't 36 year old Matt Hasselbecks.........they are looking for places to start long term and playing in front of a first round pick is not that. I don't understand your post...it reads like you are mocking my comment, but you seem to have the exact same opinion as me, that Bradford and those types are NOT going to sign to be a 1 year bridge here. That was my whole point...so not sure if your response reads wrong or if you misread my post, but you seem to literally just echo the same thing I just said multiple times. For someone to land one of those guys its going to take more than a 1 year deal and more money than TT. So Bills as a team are better off keeping TT who comes off the books next year and is cheaper anyway. Then in 2019, if the rookie had not already taken over in 2018, they will certainly be the starter and we dont have a cap eating high priced bench warmer like Bradford and TT is off the books and gone. We then sign a cheap backup option (unless Peterman wins that job who is also cheap) to our new shiny rookie we drafted this year.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Yes, if they get what they want.... ie: what they feel is fair. And I'm betting McDermott and Beane value Taylor a helluva lot more than some here think they do. If they don't get what they feel is fair, they likely keep him. I agree , we shouldn't just let him go for nothing and as much as I want make sure we have an upgrade first.
Mat68 Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 It would make no sense to move on from Taylor unless a better Qb is on the roster. I dont mean more potential, actually better today. Taylors salary isnt bad, no reason to make a mistake at Qb because you are desperate. With his bonus not until the third day they could sign or trade for a Qb and then cut him. If they are poised to draft a rookie Taylor makes for good competition or bridge Qb. He provides a level of play that needs to be surpassed. 2
Klaista2k Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 Are you !@#$ing kidding me? I really hope they aren't considering brining him back.
GunnerBill Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 This is not about keeping Tyrod folks. That ship has still sailed. This is about maximising his trade value. The Bills are essentially willing to take a cap hit by paying the option to buy a draft pick (or an improved draft pick). Cleveland remains my prediction. They have zero at the position and might be taking a guy in Darnold who is not ready day 1. Arizona is in play too depending on what their draft plan is. 3
Ol Dirty B Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 11 hours ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said: Tyrod + Lamar Jackson = worst case scenario, as they are pretty much the same player; Jackson just happens to be a bit taller. Which, honestly could make a world of difference. Tyrod can't see over the middle. I'm not saying it's a guarantee it's all a crap shoot. But Tyrod is the best this team has probably had since Bledsoe or even kelly. Give him 3 inches, and the same playmaking ability, he could be great. I know it's not a popular opinion, but him with some more height could be huge... It also could mean he'd have some effed up knees by now though, so it's a risk either way. Not that I want Jackson, but I don't think he's the worst risk to take.
transplantbillsfan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 5 hours ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said: Nope, I knew the Bills would not have a great defense but with the secondary being totally gutted I thought they might have a shot at having a good secondary and get turnovers. Numbers are not everything, Shady picked up a ton of critical 1st downs and kept drives alive. He was easily the MVP of the Bills offense. So did Taylor. Taylor was fantastic on 3rd downs in 2017.
Klaista2k Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) 55 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: This is not about keeping Tyrod folks. That ship has still sailed. This is about maximising his trade value. The Bills are essentially willing to take a cap hit by paying the option to buy a draft pick (or an improved draft pick). Cleveland remains my prediction. They have zero at the position and might be taking a guy in Darnold who is not ready day 1. Arizona is in play too depending on what their draft plan is. It's hard to see any team trading for Tyrod. I can't even imagine us getting a 7th for him to be honest. Edited February 23, 2018 by Klaista2k
SouthNYfan Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 15 hours ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said: Tyrod + Lamar Jackson = worst case scenario, as they are pretty much the same player; Jackson just happens to be a bit taller. No. They are not "pretty much the same player". 1
ALF Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 Let first days of free agency play out. Will the Bills sign a FA QB , will a team make a trade for Taylor if the Bills pay the $6M option. They can release Taylor before March 16 or decide to keep him 1 more year as a bridge. 2018 Roster Bonus: $6M (due 3/16/2018, $1M fully guaranteed at signing)
Recommended Posts