Won't anyone think of the poor, sensitive Lawful Gun Owner?

[Warren Zevon]

He's really taking you to tasker. Watch out! 

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

FTFY

 

 

Hahahahahahha. Oh Tasker... dammit man, I knewwwwwwwww this was you, I knewwwww it, knew it, knew it... and you just had to go and prove it, didn't you? You just couldn't be a three-dimensional human being capable of rational thought, could you? Ugh, Tasker, I had such hopes. But you had to be this ridiculous stereotype, moments away from saying "Antifa" or something. 

 

Here's the deal. You are pretending you've made a point by... not making a point. You're pretending that I haven't made a point, despite being the only one making points. You have not, in reality, put forth any argument. You have not engaged in intellectual debate. You have not tested any ideas. You have steadfastly refused to make your point about slavery, because you don't have any point. You didn't have any point when you doubled down on your 2A argument, either.

 

Would you like to know why? Because you're pretending. You can only argue semantics. You have only empty tactics, nothing of substance.

 

I told you before and will tell you again — I saw through this nonsense from the beginning. Your playbook isn't new. Ya ain't got sh*t on sh*t, and your fedora doesn't make you look smart. Just sweaty.

 

HAHAHAHHAHA YOU EDITED IN ANITFA

And you can't even spell it.

[TakeYouToTasker]

3 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

FTFY

 

 

Hahahahahahha. Oh Tasker... dammit man, I knewwwwwwwww this was you, I knewwwww it, knew it, knew it... and you just had to go and prove it, didn't you? You just couldn't be a three-dimensional human being capable of rational thought, could you? Ugh, Tasker, I had such hopes. But you had to be this ridiculous stereotype, moments away from saying "Antifa" or something. 

 

Here's the deal. You are pretending you've made a point by... not making a point. You're pretending that I haven't made a point, despite being the only one making points. You have not, in reality, put forth any argument. You have not engaged in intellectual debate. You have not tested any ideas. You have steadfastly refused to make your point about slavery, because you don't have any point. You didn't have any point when you doubled down on your 2A argument, either.

 

Would you like to know why? Because you're pretending. You can only argue semantics. You have only empty tactics, nothing of substance.

 

I told you before and will tell you again — I saw through this nonsense from the beginning. Your playbook isn't new. Ya ain't got sh*t on sh*t, and your fedora doesn't make you look smart. Just sweaty.

See?  The spiders don't like the sunlight.

 

Let's talk about the underpinnings of your ideology, Grant.

 

Or are you going to continue to engage in your brand of devout intellectual cowardice?

[Koko78]

1 hour ago, Nanker said:

Why don't they just pass a law that makes it illegal to kill another person with a gun.

We already limit how much alcohol you can drink and drive. Sounds like that's a winner solution to me! 

 

Maybe we also need more signs. No one ignores a "gun free zone" or a "drug free zone" sign.

 

Hell, you can't even buy drugs within two blocks of a school, apparently!

[Warren Zevon]

Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Maybe we also need more signs. No one ignores a "gun free zone" or a "drug free zone" sign.

 

Hell, you can't even buy drugs within two blocks of a school, apparently!

 

Did you send your new definition of store to Webster yet?

[TakeYouToTasker]

8 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

Edited March 2, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker

[Koko78]

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Did you send your new definition of store to Webster yet?

 

You'll note that the coward never would define what he means by a store.

 

By the way, when are you actually going to post something original, rather than regurgitating what other posters say?

[LA Grant]

4 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

See?  The spiders don't like the sunlight.

 

Let's talk about the underpinnings of your ideology, Grant.

 

Or are you going to continue to engage in your brand of devout intellectual cowardice?

 

HAHAHAHA. You're done, b*tch. Topic is gun control. Has been for 25 pages. 

 

If you have something to offer besides "making it all about you," you lonely ass fool, then put it out there. Unless you're an "intellectual coward," you should have no issue making whatever point you're trying to make. 

 

If you can't contribute to the conversation without me going into another of your rabbit holes, then spare us, Tasker. Said it before, will say it again, I'm not interested in any more of your holes. They're dark, smelly, and unproductive.

 

If you ain't gonna contribute, then go ahead & take a bow, because we've seen all of your "TakeYouToTactics" and now the show is over. Curtains. Done. Learn a new routine before you sign up again.

[Warren Zevon]

Just now, Koko78 said:

 

You'll note that the coward never would define what he means by a store.

 

By the way, when are you actually going to post something original, rather than regurgitating what other posters say?

 

Do you need every word in every sentence to be defined to you before you respond to a question?

 

Imagine the confusion if you were ever told to pick up some bananas at the store.

[Nanker]

Edited March 2, 2018 by Nanker

[LA Grant]

Just now, garybusey said:

Do you need every word in every sentence to be defined to you before you respond to a question?

 

Also, I did define store for him. I was even willing to entertain his hypothetical about the "illegal drug store." 

 

His point was that it's just as easy to buy illegal heroin as it is to buy a legal gun. I asked him to prove it. When you ask for conservatives to prove something... you get this thread, with these responses.

 

Nice to meet ya, Busey.

[Warren Zevon]

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Do you need every word in every sentence to be defined to you before you respond to a question?

 

Imagine the confusion if you were ever told to pick up some bananas at the store.

 

Sorry about the heroin I brought home, honey. I just didn't understand what you meant by store.

[DC Tom]

11 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

You'll note that the coward never would define what he means by a store.

 

By the way, when are you actually going to post something original, rather than regurgitating what other posters say?

 

He did define "disease," though.  But woefully incorrectly, so perhaps it's better he never defined "store."

[TakeYouToTasker]

29 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

HAHAHAHA. You're done, b*tch. Topic is gun control. Has been for 25 pages. 

 

If you have something to offer besides "making it all about you," you lonely ass fool, then put it out there. Unless you're an "intellectual coward," you should have no issue making whatever point you're trying to make. 

 

If you can't contribute to the conversation without me going into another of your rabbit holes, then spare us, Tasker. Said it before, will say it again, I'm not interested in any more of your holes. They're dark, smelly, and unproductive.

 

If you ain't gonna contribute, then go ahead & take a bow, because we've seen all of your "TakeYouToTactics" and now the show is over. Curtains. Done. Learn a new routine before you sign up again.

Looks like I struck a nerve.

 

This is the face of neo-Marxism.

 

Grant lies, makes ugly baseless charges, engages in ad hom attacks in an effort not to have to be forthcoming about his actual agenda.

 

Look at the lengths he's going to not to have to talk about the set of ideas he subscribes to, of which gun control is an inextricable part.

 

He has, in fact, refused to engage about the arch of his ideology because he knows it is unpalatable, unpopular, and the antithesis of traditional American values, and is instead attempting to make an appeal to emotion in a vacuum, separate from ideological and philosophical underpinnings, despite the obvious reality that nothing exists in a vacuum.

 

An honest participant, with no underlying agenda, would have no problem discussing these things as they would have the potential to strengthen their argument.  Grant does not, because discussing these things is irreparably damaging to his argument.

 

Watch now, as he again refuses to answer the questions posed, and becomes more belligerent and antagonistic in place of intellectual honesty.

 

 

 

Edited March 2, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker

[Koko78]

37 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

Also, I did define store for him. I was even willing to entertain his hypothetical about the "illegal drug store." 

 

His point was that it's just as easy to buy illegal heroin as it is to buy a legal gun. I asked him to prove it. When you ask for conservatives to prove something... you get this thread, with these responses.

 

Nice to meet ya, Busey.

 

Yeah, you "defined" it, by crying about buying legal heroin at a store within two blocks of a school when your original example (much like all of your "points" in PPP) proved to be moronic.

35 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Sorry about the heroin I brought home, honey. I just didn't understand what you meant by store.

 

Hey Gary, still waiting on an original thought from you.

26 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Grant lies, makes ugly baseless charges, engages in ad hom attacks in an effort not to have to be forthcoming about his actual agenda.

 

Look at the lengths he's going to not to have to talk about the set of ideas he subscribes to, of which gun control is an inextricable part.

 

Watch now, as he again refuses to answer the questions posed, and becomes more belligerent and antagonistic in place of intellectual honesty.

 

Well, yeah. He's a liberal. That's kinda what they do when they can't argue facts, logic, reason, or anything other than their 'feelings'.

 

Edited March 2, 2018 by Koko78

[TakeYouToTasker]

4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, yeah. He's a liberal. That's kinda what they do when they can't argue facts, logic, reason, or anything other than their 'feelings'.

 

He's not a liberal.  He's a self-described leftist. 

[Koko78]

Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

He's not a liberal.  He's a self-described leftist. 

 

Well, whatever he self-identifies as today. Of course, he's pretty intellectually dishonest, so can you really believe what he's describing himself as?

[TakeYouToTasker]

On ‎02‎/‎23‎/‎2018 at 2:50 AM, LA Grant said:

...I'm leftist, obviously...

 

7 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, whatever he self-identifies as today. Of course, he's pretty intellectually dishonest, so can you really believe what he's describing himself as?

Yes, because he describes himself as being a member of a group fairly uniformly devout in their intellectual dishonesty.

Edited March 2, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker

[LA Grant]

40 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

He did define "disease," though.  But woefully incorrectly, so perhaps it's better he never defined "store."

 

Actually, I literally copy & pasted the dictionary definition of "disease" for you, and even connected the definition to how gun violence fits said definition. IIRC, you were also the one who brought forth the "what about opioids" argument before the topic of "why can't the CDC research gun violence" so there's a number of contradictions here. Your selective understanding whirrrr'd and cliccccck'd that out, I guess.

 

10 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

He's not a liberal.  He's a self-described leftist. 

 

It gets even worse, Tasker — I'm a soooooooocialist! <ghost noises> If nothing else, we would agree that "nothing exists in a vacuum." Better go hide under your bed and turn up Glenn as loud as ya can, 'cuz society's comin' for ya, for yer guns and yer fedoras.

 

18 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

Yeah, you "defined" it, by crying about buying legal heroin at a store within two blocks of a school when your original example (much like all of your "points" in PPP) proved to be moronic.

 

Go back and read my response to you, darling, and try to actually respond to to the content within it.

 

Btw, this is also why I have no interest in playing the rabbit hole games with Tasker or anyone else — I gave you a full response with supporting evidence, and even graciously pulled relevant quotes so you didn't need to trouble yourself with too much reading — and your responses ever since are just angrily misunderstanding what we were even discussing.

 

We can't have any kind of honest discussion if you won't engage in the same reality. "Define store" was where you started with this, you silly boy.

[row_33]

leftist means a liberal who pretends to have read a book