Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Pretty sure Watkins cost 5 first rounders.

5 picks...3 first rounders and 2 other picks.  But you have the right idea. We mortgaged our future. Now’s the time to recoup what we lost. Albeit it’s an indirect path, but it’s a guaranteed two first round picks when someone matches our sheet for TT. 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

@JasonLaCanfora

Bills to Franchise Tyrod Taylor under a little known clause in the CBA. NFLPA set to file a grievance.

Lol. Well, that would be fun!

 

It would be Bills fans who should file a grievance if this happens.

Edited by vincec
Posted

Do the Dolphins seriously think they can get two first round picks for Jarvis Landry?? Common man. He’s a pre madonna. At least by franchising Tyrod we have a captured audience (QB is more sought after than WR). IMO

Posted
7 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

You're in Australia. That's like 15 hours ahead of us. How did you even read my thread?...it wasn't even drafted yet.

 

Oh no....i'm not giving you another 30 seconds

Posted
6 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

Have a look at how he has been gradually restructuring the roster so as to eliminate or at least moderate the damage caused by a lot of bad Whaley Ks.

 

Pay attention.

 

 

 

That was an easy response to really not support your point.

 

Support your point. I'm paying attention, perhaps I disagree with it. And I can assure you, you're no football guru, so any disagreement is reasonable.

 

The GM hasn't even had a draft yet, and you're talking like he did a bunch of things for this franchise.

Posted
19 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Leftover Bourbon Street Chicken from Applebees.

 

You hanging out with beast mode??

12 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

@JasonLaCanfora

Bills to Franchise Tyrod Taylor under a little known clause in the CBA. NFLPA set to file a grievance.

 

12 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

Thank you!!! Vindication!!!

 

Seeing as there isn't a real link, I think it's a LaCONfora joke

Posted
20 hours ago, BuffaloBill said:

The real question here is - should Tyrod go up on the wall?

of the bathroom stall?   I'm sure he has 

I kid I kid 

5 hours ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

You hanging out with beast mode??

 

 

Seeing as there isn't a real link, I think it's a LaCONfora joke

a troll job by copy paste

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 hours ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Jesus no it doesnt. He is UNDER Contract. 

 

So you want tk tag him for 2019 a full year early. Ummm not allowed. 

If we wait til next year to tag him we won't get the 2 first round picks until then. We want them now.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Rob's House said:

If we wait til next year to tag him we won't get the 2 first round picks until then. We want them now.

 

Im glad someone else gets it

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

If we wait til next year to tag him we won't get the 2 first round picks until then. We want them now.

 

29 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Im glad someone else gets it

 

 

Sees what?

You can't franchise a guy who is under contract...

You also can't cut a guy to franchise him

Plus he's due $18 mil this year if we don't cut him, vs $25+ on a franchise tag...

Even if you hypothetically could do this...

Why would any team pick him up for $25mil and lose 2 picks?

Why wouldn't said team just offer a trade for him now, while he is only making $18 mil?

 

Y'all don't understand the franchise tag.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

If we wait til next year to tag him we won't get the 2 first round picks until then. We want them now.

Some guys here seem to think a “potential” free agent is only this year. Tyrod is a “potential free agent” if we don’t pick up option. You see my point. Tag him now and watch the offers come in. I think we can all agree two 1st round picks could be used by our team. That would give us four in the first round and pays us back for the Sammy fiasco. 

4 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

 

 

Sees what?

You can't franchise a guy who is under contract...

You also can't cut a guy to franchise him

Plus he's due $18 mil this year if we don't cut him, vs $25+ on a franchise tag...

Even if you hypothetically could do this...

Why would any team pick him up for $25mil and lose 2 picks?

Why wouldn't said team just offer a trade for him now, while he is only making $18 mil?

 

Y'all don't understand the franchise tag.

All wrong IMO

Posted
Just now, BringBackFergy said:

Some guys here seem to think a “potential” free agent is only this year. Tyrod is a “potential free agent” if we don’t pick up option. You see my point. Tag him now and watch the offers come in. I think we can all agree two 1st round picks could be used by our team. That would give us four in the first round and pays us back for the Sammy fiasco. 

 

People seem to be afraid to try and push the envelope on the ideas, they arent thinking outside the box. Belicheck does this all the time

Posted
18 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

5 picks...3 first rounders and 2 other picks.  But you have the right idea. We mortgaged our future. Now’s the time to recoup what we lost. Albeit it’s an indirect path, but it’s a guaranteed two first round picks when someone matches our sheet for TT. 

 

How did Watkins cost 5 the future??

 

We swapped up from #9 to #4 and threw in the following year's first and useless 4th rounders.

 

It's obvious they wanted a WR so if the picks went the same order, assuming sammy went #4, then Mike Evans and obj and Brandon cooks were available... Any of them wouldn't have been franchise altering for us.

 

Nothing was made of the 3 picks we traded, as the 2015 draft was kind of trash from where we would have picked and pleased onward.

 

We then traded Sammy to the Rams for EJ Gaines and a 2nd rounder this year.

 

So all in all as of today we are left with:

 

EJ Gaines and a 2018 second round pick #56

 

To get that we gave up: Sammy Watkins, 2015 #19 and #115

 

How is that a loss of 5 picks?

13 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

Some guys here seem to think a “potential” free agent is only this year. Tyrod is a “potential free agent” if we don’t pick up option. You see my point. Tag him now and watch the offers come in. I think we can all agree two 1st round picks could be used by our team. That would give us four in the first round and pays us back for the Sammy fiasco. 

All wrong IMO

 

It's not "imo"

Show me how you can franchise tag a guy who isn't going to be a free agent?

Even if you could, it is either an average of the top5 or top10 salaries at the position, depending on the type of franchise tag you use.

That would be around $22,000 for Tyrod plus the picks, vs 18 and picks with a normal trade

You're completely off the mark on this

Posted
46 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

 

 

Sees what?

You can't franchise a guy who is under contract...

You also can't cut a guy to franchise him

Plus he's due $18 mil this year if we don't cut him, vs $25+ on a franchise tag...

Even if you hypothetically could do this...

Why would any team pick him up for $25mil and lose 2 picks?

Why wouldn't said team just offer a trade for him now, while he is only making $18 mil?

 

Y'all don't understand the franchise tag.

So basically you'd rather let him walk and get nothing than tag him and get 2 first round picks.

×
×
  • Create New...