Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

What's the odds you could have polled everyone there to ask them who killed the kids at Parkland and get the right name?

Pablo Cruz?

Nikolas Cage?

Odds of somewhere between 200,000 and 800,000 people all getting it right? Less than "0".

Posted

USA TODAY HARSHES THE NARRATIVE: Despite The Protests, Many High Schoolers Are Pro-Gun:

They’re young, fierce and — at least for the moment — the most prominent voices in America’s debate over guns.

 

But not all members of “Generation Columbine” cling to the rhetoric making household names out of some of their peers, those students calling for tighter gun control after the deadly Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

 

Many American high schoolers do not blame school shootings on guns and don’t argue the answer is tighter restrictions on firearms. It’s a view at odds with many of their classmates, yet born from the same safety concerns.

 

“There’s many things that go into a solution for this, and it’s not guns,” said Melanie Clark, an 18-year-old high school senior from Tallahassee. “We’re definitely in the minority for believing that it’s not guns.”

 

As gun-control advocates their age gain popularity and others cast their generation as anti-firearm, pro-gun students feel at times overlooked. But polling suggests young people aren’t overwhelmingly for gun control.

 

 

Weird, because that’s all they show on CNN.

Posted

The same politicians who call for you to not have the ability to bare fire arms are the same ones that go around all the time with armed security.

 

Oh the hypocrisy.

 

Again, people in this country have no common sense whatsoever, so I will state the two OBVIOUSLY common sense things, ONCE AGAIN................

 

If criminals/harm doers want to get any kind of gun they want to kill you, THEY WILL ALWAYS be able to get the weapon of their choice, no matter what laws are on the book........

 

And.......................

 

Law abiding citizens have the right to protect themselves and their families with their guns of choice. It has been that way since this country was born and it that changes, you might as well tell these law abiding citizens to get out of this country.

Posted
2 hours ago, Kevbeau said:

If this was truly about saving lives, they’d be marching for mandatory defensive driving courses. 

 

Also the quality of signage flies in the face of an “organic” march.

 

Protestors: Government is out of control, they don't listen to us! 

 

Me: Yup. 

 

Protestors: We need to get rid of the second amendment to stay safe! 

 

Me: !@#$ off. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

SEVEN OBSERVATIONS ON THE “MARCH FOR OUR LIVES” PROTEST

by Paul Mirengoff

 

I didn’t go to the children’s anti-gun march in Washington today, having paid my dues at the women’s anti-Trump march on inauguration weekend. However, Jarrett Stepman of the Daily Signal attended. He provides seven takeaways, none of which will surprise readers.

 

The seven are:

 

1. It was a left-wing event.

 

2. It was well-organized and well-funded.

 

3. Prayer was ridiculed.

 

4. Those who disagree with the protesters were condemned as complicit in murder.

 

5. The Second Amendment is viewed as outdated and problematic.

 

6. Many protesters were fuzzy on the fact (to put it kindly).

 

7. The march was definitely not a gun-free zone.

 

 

 

Stepman’s report, along with pictures from the march, is here.

 

 

The Hill corrects:....................http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/380172-march-for-our-lives-crowd-smaller-than-expected-report

'March for Our Lives' crowd smaller than expected: report

 

A Sunday estimate of the crowd at the “March for Our Lives” rally for gun control in Washington, D.C., on Saturday was much smaller than the crowd estimated by organizers.

Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc. estimated around 200,000 people attended the rally, CBS News reportedOrganizers on Saturday estimated 800,000.

 

 

 

AND.............as needs to be repeated on every page:

 

A reminder from the Washington Post: School shootings becoming LESS common... 

 

 

 

 

.

.

Edited by B-Man
Posted
44 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Pablo Cruz?

Nikolas Cage?

Odds of somewhere between 200,000 and 800,000 people all getting it right? Less than "0".

I want to start a fake meme to make it David Hogg

Posted (edited)

This image juxtaposition is hard to even believe.

 

On the right, a sign reads, “Speak for the ones who can’t.” It is a call for more stringent gun laws. And in the image on the left, there are “we stand with Planned Parenthood” signs strewn across the memorial.

 
From the parent of one of the Parkland murdered teenagers...............but maybe (like bzrul) he is just concerned with his penis
 
 
Quote

 

 

I stopped by MSD this morning to visit my daughter’s memorial. The irony of what I saw is almost more than one can bear. Who speaks for the ones that can’t? #MarchForOurLives

 

 
DZIeex2U8AEyeL8.jpgDZIeexyU0AEGinZ.jpg
 
 

That someone could place those messages of death in the midst of such a somber memorial is just sick.

Sick. Sick. Sick.

 

What kind of sick, selfish person uses the memorial site for a murdered 14 year old Mormon girl to push Planned Parenthood? I am so, so sad that her father had to see this.

Edited by B-Man
Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

 

 

It will be interesting to see what this dipSchiff is going to do for attention after November, when he's no longer useful to the liberals.

Posted
 
Quote

 

Today, we marched. Tomorrow, we fight.

 

 

 

Parkland survivor Kyle Kashuv asks the most important and pressing question when it comes to the March for Our Lives rallies that took place this weekend.

 

 

 
Quote

 

 

Fight for what? I'm still unclear about that https://twitter.com/delaneytarr/status/977723640971177984 

 

 

 

 

The answer is clear

 

To elect Democrats. That's all this has ever been about.

 

 

 

 

 

whatever happened to Black Lives Matter? Were they at the March for Our Lives?

Posted
18 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

800k?  That'll be 1.2M by Tuesday.

 

When really, it was more like 500k.

Metro alone said it had 500K riders to and from the "event" 

 

 

18 hours ago, garybusey said:

 

Boy Man is out of his mind. Let him post as much bull **** as he needs to.

He can post what he wants.     If he wants to act like a crazed right wing fringe fanatic then I can get a good laugh.  

 

If anyone wants to act like a crazed left wing fringe fanatic then I too can get a good laugh. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, B-Man said:

I give up..............You are too far gone.

 

The separate article that I posted, and for that matter all the others, do not remotely reflect what you have tried to claim as the conservative viewpoint on this.

 

Just keep twisting everyone's replies

 

and I'll keep posting articles from reporters at the 'march'

Sorry B-Man, it is you that has the problem.  You choose to believe your party is the best and the other side sucks at everything.  

 

Both sides LIE. Both sides are self serving.  Members of both sides are willing to switch parties if it gets them re-elected.  

 

Both sides have some form of "media" in their pockets that will write the viewpoint that will serve their base. 

 

When you come to realize this you will be better for it.  

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Posted

The big take away from this is that each time a school gets shot up, these kids will be ready to organize a response and put pressure on law makers to do something. They will get the attention of the media. 

 

If there are no more school shootings, they will quickly disappear. 

 

 

Posted

Hey remember when LA Grant, gator, Shady et al. told us that "nobody is coming for your guns you paranoid lunatics."

 

You guys want to own up to those lies now or later?

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...