SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) On 3/28/2018 at 7:09 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: He is correct, and you are wrong on several fronts. ARs are very often used for hunting, and they are looking to violate individual's right to bear arms. You have a former Supreme Court Justice opining that it's time to repeal the Second Amendment. Expand You are telling me that people use that ^ to hunt deer, bear and rabbit? Again when the Feds go walking into you home to take your guns away. please PM me and send me photos of it Edited March 28, 2018 by ShadyBillsFan 1
row_33 Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 for a liberal cause inflate the crowd size by a million fold for a conservative pretend it never happened, it that doesn't work shrink the estimate to 5% of the honest count rule 23(a) of the Liberal Media guide to agitprop
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:14 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: You are telling me that people use that ^ to hunt deer, bear and rabbit? Again please PM me and send mo photos of the Feds walking into you home to take your guns away. Expand Yes, I am. The fact that you disagree shows a tremendous amount of ignorance about gun ownership, and gun usage to the point that you probably shouldn't opine about it until you've done actual research. As to "walking into my home and taking guns away", that's a red herring. The repeal of the Second Amendment would mean that I no longer would have my right to own arms protected by the government, and without that protected right, could have any and all arms seized at the will of those in power.
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:14 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: You are telling me that people use that ^ to hunt deer, bear and rabbit? Again when the Feds go walking into you home to take your guns away. please PM me and send me photos of it Expand http://time.com/4390506/gun-control-ar-15-semiautomatic-rifles/
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:18 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: Yes, I am. The fact that you disagree shows a tremendous amount of ignorance about gun ownership, and gun usage to the point that you probably shouldn't opine about it until you've done actual research. As to "walking into my home and taking guns away", that's a red herring. The repeal of the Second Amendment would mean that I no longer would have my right to own arms protected by the government, and without that protected right, could have any and all arms seized at the will of those in power. Expand Ignorance? Because I would use a "typical" rifle? The ignorance in not on my part. Don't worry Dearest Donald tweeted that the retired judge is wrong. You are safe. On 3/28/2018 at 7:20 PM, DC Tom said: http://time.com/4390506/gun-control-ar-15-semiautomatic-rifles/ Expand Thanks Tom. When I hunted it was with either a shotgun or a hunting rifle and occasionally my .357 pistol, both long guns adequately served it's purpose.
LeviF Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:23 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Ignorance? Because I would use a "typical" rifle? Expand No, ignorance because you didn't know that people do use AR platform rifles to hunt. Not knowing something is, by definition, ignorance of that something. On 3/28/2018 at 7:23 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Thanks Tom. When I hunted it was with either a shotgun or a hunting rifle and occasionally my .357 pistol, both long guns adequately served it's purpose. Expand It's not a matter of adequacy. Despite the old saying, a knife is often adequate in a gun fight, but that's not the point.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) On 3/28/2018 at 7:30 PM, LeviF91 said: No, ignorance because you didn't know that people do use AR platform rifles to hunt. Not knowing something is, by definition, ignorance of that something. It's not a matter of adequacy. Despite the old saying, a knife is often adequate in a gun fight, but that's not the point. Expand If you had stated it like Tom did, things would be much simpler than what you actually said. a tremendous amount of ignorance I admit to making mistakes and not knowing everything. But still, however "ignorant" that i am, I don't think they are walking into my home and taking my 3 guns away. Edited March 28, 2018 by ShadyBillsFan
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:23 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Thanks Tom. When I hunted it was with either a shotgun or a hunting rifle and occasionally my .357 pistol, both long guns adequately served it's purpose. Expand The NATO 5.56 is little more than a rechambered .223 Remington cartridge, which is the most mass-produced and most popular ammunition in the country, and a very common hunting round (smaller game, mostly...but can be used for game as large as deer.) I don't know why anyone would believe a priori that the AR-15 isn't used as a hunting rifle, when the round commonly is.
boyst Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:14 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: You are telling me that people use that ^ to hunt deer, bear and rabbit? Again when the Feds go walking into you home to take your guns away. please PM me and send me photos of it Expand Oh my God scary gun scary gun
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:35 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: If you had stated it like Tom did, things would be much simpler that what you actually said. a tremendous amount of ignorance I admit to making mistakes and not knowing everything. But still, however "ignorant" that i am, I don't think they are walking into my home and taking my 3 guns away. Expand Saying you were ignorant on the topic was not intended as an insult. You were opining on something where you obviously lacked the working knowledge. In general I think people would be better of listening instead of talking in those situations. As to your three guns, if the Second Amendment is repealed you have no protected right to them; and will have given the government all the power they need to come into your home and do exactly that. Please bear in mind that the protection of your rights is what is important here. Once you've surrendered those protections, there is no getting them back once the government has already begun violating your rights.
LeviF Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:35 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: But still, however "ignorant" that i am, I don't think they are walking into my home and taking my 3 guns away. Expand As Tasker has said, eroding the 2nd Amendment further is not strictly about BATFEces agents walking into my house, shooting my dog, and taking my guns. I'm not saying that armed patrols are out looking for my guns right now. What I'm saying is that further erosion of the 2A is giving the government the power to do just that. Making pro-2A people out to be paranoid lunatics only drives that crowd further into one-issue voting.
IDBillzFan Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:41 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: Please bear in mind that the protection of your rights is what is important here. Expand And this is why the 'ignorance' label fits. The chuckleheads who point at a particular scary-looking gun and argue "You don't need this to shoot deer!" prove they have no idea what they are arguing about. In a way, I'm happy to see the Hogg child making the rounds. He's the perfect personification of the anti-gun crowd: naive, contradicts himself constantly, and in general is nothing more than a confused Cindy Sheehan with a gayer haircut.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 7:52 PM, LeviF91 said: As Tasker has said, eroding the 2nd Amendment further is not strictly about BATFEces agents walking into my house, shooting my dog, and taking my guns. I'm not saying that armed patrols are out looking for my guns right now. What I'm saying is that further erosion of the 2A is giving the government the power to do just that. Making pro-2A people out to be paranoid lunatics only drives that crowd further into one-issue voting. Expand Maybe, I am ignorant. But I won't buy into some conspiracy theory that the feds will chase me down for the 3 guns that I own. And living in Virginia I don't have to register them. So the only record any state has is NY and I left there in 1997. Tasker How about you say - Hey Shady you are misinformed. a bit of respect goes a long way.
LeviF Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 8:00 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Maybe, I am ignorant. But I won't buy into some conspiracy theory that the feds will chase me down for the 3 guns that I own. And living in Virginia I don't have to register them. So the only record any state has is NY and I left there in 1997. Expand And again, that's not really the point. If you surrender your rights in any way you've given them the power to do whatever they want, which is exactly what the 2A was crafted to prevent.
IDBillzFan Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) On 3/28/2018 at 8:00 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Maybe, I am ignorant. But I won't buy into some conspiracy theory that the feds will chase me down for the 3 guns that I own. Expand Just for fun, specifically who told you the feds will chase you down for the 3 guns you own? Who is making that case? Edited March 28, 2018 by LABillzFan
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 8:02 PM, LeviF91 said: And again, that's not really the point. If you surrender your rights in any way you've given them the power to do whatever they want, which is exactly what the 2A was crafted to prevent. Expand And it would be the entire point of repealing the Second. There is no other reason to do so. If no one wants to government to take away your guns, then there is no need to repeal the Second, which would give them the authority to do so. On 3/28/2018 at 8:00 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Tasker How about you say - Hey Shady you are misinformed. a bit of respect goes a long way. Expand Saying you are ignorant of something is exactly that. It's not insulting, and is not synonymous with calling a person stupid. It's is synonymous with telling someone they aren't informed on a given topic.
boyst Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 I'm glad I don't own any guns to have the feds come knock my door down. Y'all gun huggers are !@#$ed.
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 8:00 PM, ShadyBillsFan said: Maybe, I am ignorant. But I won't buy into some conspiracy theory that the feds will chase me down for the 3 guns that I own. And living in Virginia I don't have to register them. So the only record any state has is NY and I left there in 1997. Tasker How about you say - Hey Shady you are misinformed. a bit of respect goes a long way. Expand Tell that to the Branch Davidians. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 8:20 PM, DC Tom said: Tell that to the Branch Davidians. Expand Doubt Shady's old enough to remember that OR ruby ridge.
row_33 Posted March 28, 2018 Posted March 28, 2018 On 3/28/2018 at 8:34 PM, joesixpack said: Doubt Shady's old enough to remember that OR ruby ridge. Expand or the history of your Native Indian
Recommended Posts