Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

All the stats need to be factored in. But it was just funny to me that rating means nothing when it’s good and Taylor is just padding stats and not taking risks but when his rating is bad we’ll go ahead and use it to prove a point. 

As I said.  One bad game can be overlooked.   It happens to the elites from time to time.  (Well not 40 bad) 

 

3 in a season should not be ignored.  

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

I didn’t ask that question. Shady did. And then I put in my 2 cents about what you said. If you are gonna lay down blanket statements I’m gonna point out they are missing context. 

Oh...sorry Shady...as for your comment, Stank- that’s great :lol:

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Stank_Nasty said:

Right. That sums it up. Really that simple isn’t it? 

 

This is a joke of a post. 

 

Great job. Keep it up. 

 

I was being facetious but I can see how you wouldn't see that.

stank

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
Posted
Just now, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

 

I was being facetious but I can see how you would see that.

stank

My bad. 

1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

As I said.  One bad game can be overlooked.   It happens to the elites from time to time.  (Well not 40 bad) 

 

3 in a season should not be ignored.  

 

 

Right. Apparently you can’t see how flawed it is to use rating in that discussion but yet anytime he’s had a good one you basically discount it. The team wins in spite of him in those occasions right? 

 

Dude... be consistent. If you say rating is overrated then you can’t freaking use it to prove a point. When you do it’s not a good look 

 

ftr those games were enough for me as well. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Stank_Nasty said:

Right. That sums it up. Really that simple isn’t it? 

 

This is a joke of a post. 

 

Great job. Keep it up. 

It’s actually a fantastic post. 

  • Like (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...