Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Look at the East Germans criticize me 

Build that wall! Build that wall!

 

Baue die Mauer! Baue die Mauer!

Edited by 3rdnlng
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

File for disability.  You are birth defected. 

I was thinking medications? I don't want to respond to that guy and give him any attention

whatsoever, he may be the worst troll i've ever come across...to the point where I don't even want to argue

with him, a first for me.

I strongly suspect he may be the most racist person on this board, it consumes him.

Edited by Albwan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Albwan said:

I was thinking medications? I don't want to respond to that guy and give him any attention

whatsoever, he may be the worst troll i've ever come across...to the point where I don't even want to argue

with him, a first for me.

I strongly suspect he may be the most racist person on this board, it consumes him.

 

Because he is incapable.

 

My point of Americans sharing stories that they know are fake, just to point it out to others went right by him. He simply went back to his "look at your sources" BS,

as if that had anything to do with my reply :lol:

Posted
21 minutes ago, Albwan said:

I strongly suspect he may be the most racist person on this board, it consumes him.

 

No, just the stupidest.  He's the moron that gave us gems such as "obfuscation with detail and facts."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, GG said:

 

And if I told you that the survey itself is biased and full of crap, what would you say?

 

I’d say studying their how they picked their data is worth a look into. 

Posted
1 minute ago, GG said:

 

How about looking up and linking the study itself?

 

Hint, it took less than 4 clicks.

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

 

Their argument literally rests on the idea that lots of Obama voters are too stupid to know better.

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Their argument literally rests on the idea that lots of Obama voters are too stupid to know better.

LOL.  True.  There's a lot of reasons that Trump was able to flip a lot of traditional democratic counties in the Midwest.  Propaganda spread through social media would pry rank dead last.

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

Yup, but I really wanted the dude to do his own homework.

Posted
1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

 

Or this link if you prefer:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-junk-news-oxford-study-a8199056.html

 

They claim their data comes from an Oxford study. 

 

 

Link the article, if you want anyone to give a damn. Really, this amounts to bs to anyone who is familiar with statistics.

 

"There're lies. There're damned lies. The, there're statistics."

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, LeviF91 said:

Wait so Trump supporters share the most CNN? That seems odd.

CNN is one sided and has been that way long before Alternate Truth became a meme, FOX News is one sided.

 

Sean Hannity (the mouthpiece) for Conservatives spreads so much hate and disdain its ridiculous and the base sucks his crap up.   

don't pretend only one side is bad.   It is not helping to unite a divided America 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

CNN is one sided

 

Wait, really?  All I heard for years was that CNN was completely unbiased and could be trusted much more than those devils down at FOX! Say it ain't so! All these years of watching Wolf Bitcher down the drain!

Posted

Libtard:  CNN isn't biased

 

Thinker:  Yes it is, even liberal thinktanks have published that 98% of its reporting on Trump is unfairly negative

 

Libtard:  well...... Fox is biased!!!!

 

Thinker: (so you admit a complete reversal in 10 seconds and it doesn't sink in at all...)

 

next day:

 

Libtard:  CNN isn't biased.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

The President is probably waking up now getting ready to watch Fox and Friends. A low information president for a low information base. 

 

Whatever Ainsley says is fine with me.

×
×
  • Create New...