Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One advantage of Kizer.....has has had one full season with the Browns to throw lots of interceptions, whereas Peterman has had only about 1 game of experience (two half games) to also throw an excessive number of interceptions.  If there is a learning curve, Kizer must be further down the curve......

Posted
1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

No one is saying he should be the future but he’s more worth developing than Peterman 

 

I wouldn't have a problem with it if for no other reason than to dump Tyrod's salary

Posted
8 minutes ago, Ittakestime said:

I love how people here act like him being here has anything to do with a trade.

 

Do people forget that it is against the CBA for the Bills to even communicate with Kizer?

Don’t let facts get in the way of an interesting story

Posted
14 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

He should have,  but that ND situation was awful. He was the youngest QB in the league last year playing on a crap team with no OC and Hue yanking him in and out of the games. He could develop in the right situation. He has a lot of raw talent and now has some experience.

 

exactly!   And then draft a QB, and St. Brown at WR.  

Posted
16 minutes ago, dneveu said:

I thought he was over drafted, and should've stayed in school for at least 1 more year.  

 

Agreed. I never understood the appeal. He seems to have talent, but from what I've seen, it doesn't reveal itself on the field. 

 

He has athletic potential, but I don't think of him as any more than a long-term project. 3rd string.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Virgil said:

Tyrod for Kizer and a 4th. Do it 

 

I love your posts and recaps.

 

I don't like this idea at all. In the style of James Caan typing the same (swear) word over and over in "Misery,"

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO.

Posted
43 minutes ago, ProcessTheTrust said:

I don't buy into this being team related...but, just for fun...I'd be happy with him as a back up if we made a move for Cousins.

Why would you be happy to have him as a backup? Does that mean you don't want him to play? If a QB stinks he'll stink as a starter or backup. Still the same player

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

If there is a Starting QB I would rather have less then the guy we currently have, this is the guy. 

he would be a backup and a replacement for Peterman.  surely anyone could get on board with that

Posted
Just now, nucci said:

Why would you be happy to have him as a backup? Does that mean you don't want him to play? If a QB stinks he'll stink as a starter or backup. Still the same player

Imo he needs a decent coach, better offense and is still raw.

×
×
  • Create New...