CommonCents Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Malcolm smokes his pot and I get my ring. Or Bench Malcolm and try again next year. Thanks Billdo, good choice 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, simool said: .......if that is what happened, how do you guys think McD would have acted in the identical situation?...............
simool Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said: .......if that is what happened, how do you guys think McD would have acted in the identical situation?............... Probably the same. Word is that Butler had a meltdown about the pot.
WMDman Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said: .......if that is what happened, how do you guys think McD would have acted in the identical situation?............... prolly would have handled it eternally like he did with shaq(i think it was shaq, coulda been jerry)
LabattBlue Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 If rumors are true, why even dress him? Something doesn’t add up. 1
26CornerBlitz Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 8 minutes ago, simool said: If this is true, then I'm surprised Belichick didn't just designate him as inactive because in effect he was with only one ST snap for the entire game.
Starr Almighty Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 1 minute ago, LabattBlue said: If rumors are true, why even dress him? Something doesn’t add up. Maybe BB was trying to publicly shame him?
ProcessTheTrust Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: If this is true, then I'm surprised Belichick didn't just designate him as inactive because in effect he was with only one ST snap for the entire game. BB always has a method to his madness. What's worse, being inactive or getting dressed and having to stand in full gear on the sideline all game?
Paulus Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Just now, simool said: Honestly, you really can't blame BB for the benching. Butler hurt the team, not BB.
LabattBlue Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said: Maybe BB was trying to publicly shame him? By wasting a spot on the 53 man roster with a guy you had no intention of playing...no matter how bad your secondary is getting torched? Sounds like a solid plan.
26CornerBlitz Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Just now, ProcessTheTrust said: BB always has a method to his madness. What's worse, being inactive or getting dressed and having to stand in full gear on the sideline all game? Butler is headed to UFA anyway. Why not activate someone you plan to utilize such that the team has a better chance to win the ultimate game?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: If this is true, then I'm surprised Belichick didn't just designate him as inactive because in effect he was with only one ST snap for the entire game. I'm sure he wasn't thinking there would only be one punt.
26CornerBlitz Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 1 minute ago, joesixpack said: I'm sure he wasn't thinking there would only be one punt. Whoosh!
ProcessTheTrust Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Butler is headed to UFA anyway. Why not activate someone you plan to utilize such that the team has a better chance to win the ultimate game? If missing the Sat morn meeting was the final straw, who can you activate in time to make a difference? Maybe he was dressed as a last resort. I can't fight to defend BB, can't stand the guy, but just trying to somehow understand his perspective.
26CornerBlitz Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Just now, ProcessTheTrust said: If missing the Sat morn meeting was the final straw, who can you activate in time to make a difference? Maybe he was dressed as a last resort. I can't fight to defend BB, can't stand the guy, but just trying to somehow understand his perspective. They had some pretty good players who were inactive for the game. Although he may have been forced to use Butler at CB if Rowe was injured.
Starr Almighty Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 9 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: By wasting a spot on the 53 man roster with a guy you had no intention of playing...no matter how bad your secondary is getting torched? Sounds like a solid plan. I'm just trying to figure out this madness I'm not saying it was the right thing to do
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted February 5, 2018 Posted February 5, 2018 Ironic- a Super Bowl once allowed him to become a household name just a little bit later on the same stage he became notorious
Recommended Posts