DKBills25 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Die hard fan, just made this account But I think this would be the best move for us I think cousins will demand too much money and even thou he can throw well I don’t think he would get us in the right direction we need to draft our future (mayfield,Jackson) and sigh Bradford to help mold the rook. basically what the chiefs did. Bradford IMO we can get cheap and will give us the best chance to win I would also love to see us maybe trade for a young starter (most likely not gonna happen) but maybe Luck,Dalton or Winston 3
baskingridgebillsfan Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 I like Bradford. When healthy he is very good. I have no issue rolling the dice with him. 1
jtrip Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Tyler Steege @TSteegeNFL Age: Kirk Cousins: 29 Alex Smith: 33 ,000 yard seasons Kirk Cousins: 3 Alex Smith: 1 Total TD passes last 3 seasons: Kirk Cousins: 81 Alex Smith: 61 The #Redskins just traded FOR an older QB who isn’t even as good as their current QB. 1
Mrbojanglezs Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Bradford may be a good bridge qb as he won't be as expensive. Maybe we get lucky and he stays healthy if not at a minimum he is good for grooming the rookie and or Peterman
Pirate Angel Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Well we wouldn't have to worry about when to put the new guy in with Bradford. ..he'll be injured by week 4 3
Green Lightning Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, BILLriant said: Well we wouldn't have to worry about when to put the new guy in with Bradford. ..he'll be injured by week 4 Bradford couldn't last 6 games in a flag football league. 1 1
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 25 minutes ago, jtrip said: Tyler Steege @TSteegeNFL Age: Kirk Cousins: 29 Alex Smith: 33 ,000 yard seasons Kirk Cousins: 3 Alex Smith: 1 Total TD passes last 3 seasons: Kirk Cousins: 81 Alex Smith: 61 The #Redskins just traded FOR an older QB who isn’t even as good as their current QB. I don't think the Redskins have a current QB. They are not paying him 35mil and the transition tag is out of the question. I don't think the Redskins think Cousins is worth what other teams are willing to pay, I doubt they transition him for that reason.
mead107 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Guess this thread is different than the other trade Tyrod thread?
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 With Taylor you know there is no chance at a Super Bowl. With Bradford if he can stay healthy you have a chance at a Super Bowl. I would choose Bradford and the chance.
HOUSE Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Congrats on your first post, you did well I ordered a pizza....no ****
Thurman#1 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Just don't think you can build a team around a guy Bradford's age with his injury history. 1
FearLess Price Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 Pizza rules. Breakfast pizza is awesome. Lunch pizza is awesome. 2nd lunch pizza is awesome. Dinner pizza is awesome. High midnight pizza is awesome. Fck it. Pizza is always awesome. 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 2 hours ago, DKBills25 said: Die hard fan, just made this account But I think this would be the best move for us I think cousins will demand too much money and even thou he can throw well I don’t think he would get us in the right direction we need to draft our future (mayfield,Jackson) and sigh Bradford to help mold the rook. basically what the chiefs did. Bradford IMO we can get cheap and will give us the best chance to win I would also love to see us maybe trade for a young starter (most likely not gonna happen) but maybe Luck,Dalton or Winston This could just be me. But I don't want to read the words "get cheap" and the name of a proposed Bills QB in the same sentence ever again. What does "too much money" mean? Too much for a QB who, with some pieces around him, should have us contending for playoffs every year? Answer this: What makes it "too much"?
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, jtrip said: Tyler Steege @TSteegeNFL Age: Kirk Cousins: 29 Alex Smith: 33 ,000 yard seasons Kirk Cousins: 3 Alex Smith: 1 Total TD passes last 3 seasons: Kirk Cousins: 81 Alex Smith: 61 The #Redskins just traded FOR an older QB who isn’t even as good as their current QB. But they saved money on a shorter contract! That must mean they're smart! We'll see how it goes. Judging from the per-year figure offered to Smith relative to what they were paying Cousins, the Skins have a cap figure they are willing to allocate to QB. It's a higher figure than the Bills had in the spring of 2013 when looking at veteran QB, but having that figure in mind and looking for a guy they could pay and stay under it, didn't work out well for the Bills. 6 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: Bradford sux worse than Tyrod. He doesn't, actually, when you look at the last several years he's actually played. The problem with Bradford is those last two words "actually played". As I said elsewhere, when you have a guy who has missed 2 of the last 4 seasons, 2 1/2 of the last 5, with the same injury, most humans would conclude there's a very high probability he'll miss seasons and major sections of seasons going forward. Don't give a spot to a vet as a bridge unless you have high confidence that he'll be that one thing necessary thing: available Edited January 31, 2018 by Hapless Bills Fan
CuddyDark Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 5 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: But they saved money on a shorter contract! That must mean they're smart! We'll see how it goes. Judging from the per-year figure offered to Smith relative to what they were paying Cousins, the Skins have a cap figure they are willing to allocate to QB. He doesn't, actually, when you look at the last several years he's actually played. The problem with Bradford is those last two words "actually played". As I said elsewhere, when you have a guy who has missed 2 of the last 4 seasons, 2 1/2 of the last 5, with the same injury, most humans would conclude there's a very high probability he'll miss seasons and major sections of seasons going forward. Don't give a spot to a vet as a bridge unless you have high confidence that he'll be that one thing: available He sux. He played in a great system on a loaded team so he looked better but he sux and he would suck in Buffalo.
HOUSE Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 So in reality, you like Nathan Petermen or a drafted QB. Bradford won't last 5 games
BillsFan3434 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 I would love Bradford. He does have some issues staying on the field, but that's why we draft for our future QB hopefully in the near future, even if it does end up being Peterman. I think Bradford is a great pure pocket passer. He makes a lot, if not all of the throws that Tyrod either doesn't make or refuses to try. He has a great touch pass and great anticipation. He throws receivers open. The only thing is we obviously don't have the receiving corps that the Vikings have, obviously. It almost angers me matching these Vikings highlights. Diggs, Thielen, Rudolph, Patterson when he was there. They all find the soft spots in coverage, make contested catches, catch with their hands, and come back to the football on comeback routes. Something our receivers basically never do, which was the reason for Peterman's interception in the playoff game. I think Bradford would be a wise investment on a 3-5 year contract.
Chuck Wagon Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 I think a lot of people are going to be surprised how much money Bradford gets. 1
947 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 There is now way anybody trades anything for Tyrod, he's not even worth a 6th rounder to other teams. Even if a team did want him, they know he'll be cut & will wait it out.
Recommended Posts