Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

but she said she would have won if the election were the day before the Comey fiasco..... 

 

i chose to believe that hurt her....

 

 

What hurt her was the decision to manage her email independently on her own servers.

Posted
2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

You are such a fu ck ing moron.

 

Trump is a lot of things, but Trump colluding with Russia is the most laughable thing any of you leftist crackheads can come up with.

 

You keep throwing it out there that the Evil Trump is guilty, yet you, like all your leftist buddies, can't provide one shred of evidence.

 

Keep trying Sparky.

Trump Tower meeting is evidence. Moron 

Posted
8 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

What hurt her was the decision to manage her email independently on her own servers.

 

i doubt most voters cared about that, compared to the announcement Comey made just before the election

 

 

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Trump Tower meeting is evidence. Moron 

 

Evidence of what?

 

Again, I am open to anything, but you leftist shills are hanging on to a meeting in Trump Tower that had NOTHING and was led by a man who isn't even a member of Donald Trump's team.

 

Pathetic. And hanging on to this will cost you 6 and half years of Trump, not 2 and half.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, peace out said:

Before the right-wing ejaculate here has even dried we get a fuller read on the texts...

 

 

 

(Hasn't read the full report - the text/email is in context and it's damning. Attempting to spin it betrays your own ignorance as to the bigger picture and context, not to mention what's included in the report itself since no one has read it). 

 

 

***************************************

 

Fitting... 

**************************************

For Gary: 

 

So in other words, he's guilty of the same thing he exonerated Clinton for doing. 

 

Makes you wonder how prevalent this was (kidding, we know it was rampant inside the coup plotters' circle).

 

********************************************

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/all.htm (here's where it should drop... will link it when it does)

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted
6 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Evidence of what?

 

Again, I am open to anything, but you leftist shills are hanging on to a meeting in Trump Tower that had NOTHING and was led by a man who isn't even a member of Donald Trump's team.

 

Pathetic. And hanging on to this will cost you 6 and half years of Trump, not 2 and half.

Ya, I thought they were meeting with Russian agents who had stolen information on Clinton. 

 

That's what I get from listen to Trump's buddy Bannon 

 

Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in ...

Jan 3, 2018 - Donald Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon has described the Trump Tower meeting between the president's son and a group of ...
 
 
Posted
7 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

i doubt most voters cared about that, compared to the announcement Comey made just before the election

 

 

 

Point being if she hadn't used her own servers no "investigation" ever happens and she avoids the problem altogether, but that would have required her to subject all her doings to FOIA which could have been another downfall.  

Posted
12 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Point being if she hadn't used her own servers no "investigation" ever happens and she avoids the problem altogether, but that would have required her to subject all her doings to FOIA which could have been another downfall.  

 

i am assuming that people with an investigative assignment are primarily concerned with letting it run on and on for whatever reason they want

 

the Clintons and Trump would give literally no end to schemes and bogus threads if one was determined to hang on for 5 years poking around any rumour that arises between these parties

 

 

 

Posted
Quote

The report acknowledged that certain emails appeared to contain classified information, but investigators determined the FBI’s conclusion that Clinton did not intend to expose classified information was legitimate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-receiving-briefing-ahead-of-public-release-of-report-expected-to-criticize-fbi/2018/06/14/c08c6a5a-6fdf-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html?utm_term=.6432eb30f550

Posted
2 hours ago, peace out said:

 

Or his allegiance was to the truth. When the truth burns both Democrats and Republicans, it's easy for both sides to turn on the truth.

 

His spin is that he sought the truth.  The actions showed that he didn't want to get to the truth because it would put him in the cross hairs of powerful people.  He essentially Ortoned a 4th down run.

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
 

 

 

 

Now there's a NY Post-worthy headline

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

(Hasn't read the full report - the text/email is in context and it's damning. Attempting to spin it betrays your own ignorance as to the bigger picture and context, not to mention what's included in the report itself since no one has read it). 

 

 

***************************************

 

Fitting... 

watching the leftys, known for their vocal and inherent distrust of all things law enforcement, bend over backwards to defend corrupt law enforcement is worth it's weight in gold.  it reaffirms my belief that if someone stands for nothing, in spite of all the moral indignation and expressed outrage, they just end of being the b$tch of someone else who uses them and then moves on. 

 

it's amazing to to think that Donald Trump...Donald Trump for God's sake....may well end up the best thing that ever happened to the American political process.  Who saw that coming? 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

 

Quote

 

The report took particular aim at FBI officials investigating Clinton’s email server for moving slowly after agents in the New York Field office discovered messages on the laptop of disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner that might be relevant to their case.

By no later than September 29, the inspector general alleged, the bureau had learned “virtually every fact” it would cite as justification late the next month to search Weiner’s laptop for messages of Clinton and top aide Huma Abedin.

The inspector general derided the bureau’s reasons for not moving more quickly — that agents were waiting for additional information from New York, that they couldn’t move without a warrant and that investigators were more focused on the Russia case — as “unpersuasive,” “illogical,” and inconsistent with their assertion that they would leave no stone unturned on Clinton.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-receiving-briefing-ahead-of-public-release-of-report-expected-to-criticize-fbi/2018/06/14/c08c6a5a-6fdf-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html?utm_term=.6432eb30f550

 

OMG! So they sat on this until 10 days before the election??? 

 

Ya, the FBI was trying to hurt Trump. No wonder Rudy G was clucking like a chicken in those last days. He must have known all about this. 

Posted

Gonna take a while to get through this.

I know the OIG report does not contain criminal referrals. When will we find out what indictments are being handed down? I am assuming they will come out of Utah as that is where Huber is working on this, but how long after a report drops do arrests happen?

×
×
  • Create New...