Koko78 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Uh-oh, Jim. Not an issue for Comey. The question was whether he authorized the leaks, not whether he was aware of them.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 17, 2018 Author Posted March 17, 2018 14 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Not an issue for Comey. The question was whether he authorized the leaks, not whether he was aware of them. Wouldn't you be able to make a strong argument that he have had to authorize it by the nature of his title, especially if McCabe were passing along classified intel? (Unless of course McCabe went rogue)
Koko78 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Wouldn't you be able to make a strong argument that he have had to authorize it by the nature of his title, especially if McCabe were passing along classified intel? (Unless of course McCabe went rogue) If you're looking towards a perjury charge, it fails. Look at what McCabe said. He was authorized to share information with reporters by Comey and Wray, sure. However, Grassley's question to Comey was about authorizing the release of information specific to the Trump and Clinton investigations. Unless there is evidence that Comey specifically told McCabe (or anyone else) that he could give information about the Trump or Clinton investigations to reporters, it cannot be proven that Comey lied in response to that particular set of questions. A general authorization to share information with reporters is not what Grassley asked. Comey is a slimy worm, but he's not stupid. His answers, while disingenuous, were not lies in the context of the specific questions being asked. Grassley never asked Comey if he was aware of anyone giving the information to reporters, and who that person was. I'm sure Comey knew what Grassley was really after, but he was not obligated to give that information under oath unless he was asked the right question, which Grassley did not do. Edited March 17, 2018 by Koko78 1
Nanker Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 Oh, just give it to him. Give that righteous man his well-deserved pension. [/theleft]
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2018 Author Posted March 18, 2018 Comey is in BIG trouble. 17 hours ago, Koko78 said: Not an issue for Comey. The question was whether he authorized the leaks, not whether he was aware of them. He needs your advice, Koko:
row_33 Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 6 hours ago, Nanker said: Oh, just give it to him. Give that righteous man his well-deserved pension. [/theleft] He will get his pension through whatever means required..... he has other problems at present
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2018 Author Posted March 18, 2018 The TDS is strong. As if memos from a man who was fired for LYING and who has demonstrated partisan contempt of Trump will be viewed as credible by any grand jury or prosecutor.
row_33 Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 Never get hopes up that Dem puppets get their just rewards in the slammer
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2018 Author Posted March 18, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: Never get hopes up that Dem puppets get their just rewards in the slammer New rules post Trump.
row_33 Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: New rules post Trump. They will stall and when the Dems win back the House in November they will impeach Trump
3rdnlng Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: So McCabe is basically admitting some sort of malfeasance including the knowledge of malfeasance by others? Sounds like there could have been some sort of conspiracy going on. Hmmm. Could it have been an attempt by members of the DOJ and FBI to bring down a sitting POTUS? If so, I wonder if it includes treason? Don't worry about it Andy, you won't need a pension where you're going to end up.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2018 Author Posted March 18, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: So McCabe is basically admitting some sort of malfeasance including the knowledge of malfeasance by others? Sounds like there could have been some sort of conspiracy going on. Hmmm. Could it have been an attempt by members of the DOJ and FBI to bring down a sitting POTUS? If so, I wonder if it includes treason? Don't worry about it Andy, you won't need a pension where you're going to end up. Yup. For all the times these same people have dismissed the notion of the "deep state" - they sure do keep reinforcing its existence and reality with their reactions to McCabe being fired.
boyst Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: They will stall and when the Dems win back the House in November they will impeach Trump That's just wrong They need Trump until 2020. They impeach Trump in 2019 then motivate GOP voters and lose 2020 They will use Trump not working with them to get Winfrey/Warren ticket pumped.
Cinga Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 52 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: They will use Trump not working with them to get Winfrey/Warren ticket pumped. You made a funny!
keepthefaith Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: So McCabe is basically admitting some sort of malfeasance including the knowledge of malfeasance by others? Sounds like there could have been some sort of conspiracy going on. Hmmm. Could it have been an attempt by members of the DOJ and FBI to bring down a sitting POTUS? If so, I wonder if it includes treason? Don't worry about it Andy, you won't need a pension where you're going to end up. He's letting the prosecution know now that he'll cut a deal in exchange for testimony.
row_33 Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: That's just wrong They need Trump until 2020. They impeach Trump in 2019 then motivate GOP voters and lose 2020 They will use Trump not working with them to get Winfrey/Warren ticket pumped. The Dem House will impeach Trump but the Senate will not convict
Recommended Posts