Deranged Rhino Posted May 25, 2018 Author Posted May 25, 2018 More breaking today... This will not be reported, but is a major development: Peter Strzok's boss, Bill Priestap - the number two guy in the FBI Counter Intelligence Division - visited London in May of 2016... potentially at the same time that Downer was meeting with G-Pap. A full two months before the official opening of the FBI's investigation into the campaign (and just weeks after Rogers actions shuttering the 702 access). Note just yesterday it was reported Bill and two other FBI agents were going to testify finally to the House: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/389189-house-gop-sets-three-fbi-interviews-in-clinton-probe What's not covered in that article is that Priestap will be testifying - in part - about this trip to London. Even more surprising, it's been confirmed to me that Congressional investigators did not even know of the visit until this month... But Horowitz did. That means this information was kept from Congress because it's being used in the criminal referrals and grand jury. Absorb the ramifications of that for a moment. Let's dig in a bit more. How do we know he was in London? Two sources: This was an email about Comey's exoneration of Clinton and was released last year and went virtually unnoticed as it was buried under more headline grabbing texts and emails. But it gives us one bit of confirmation that he was indeed out of town sometime between May 9-13. How do we know it was London? Well, you have to dig through the pages and pages of text messages between Strzok and Page to find this gem: How do we know this was the same time-frame as the G-Pap/Downer meeting? Remember it was this meeting which allegedly sparked "Crossfire Hurricane". The timing of its occurrence is a major fact that so far has never been nailed down. In fact, the DOJ/FBI sources leaking to the NYT (who first broke the story) went out of their way to obscure the exact date: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html Since the NYT broke the story, Chuck Ross has narrowed the timing of the meeting down further with his outstanding reporting. Chuck points to it happening around May 10th: http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/25/alexander-downer-george-papadopoulos-mueller/ Are we to believe it was just a coincidence that the number two man in the FBI-CID was in London at the same time another London meeting took place which led to the opening of the most significant counter intelligence investigation in recent FBI history? Is it just a coincidence that Halper has direct ties to both of these men and also was in London in May? There's more to consider: Remember Priestap is likely a cooperating witness for the IG and has been for months: Unlike the others swept up in this scandal, Bill is still actively running cases: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-fbi-special-agent-pleads-guilty-leaking-classified-national-defense-information That suggests he's been cleared and or cut a sweet deal. Now, after sitting on this bombshell information for months, he's ready to tell Congress more about his story. It's all going to come out. It's all going to explode in the faces of the media and Schiffs of the world who are screaming today "there was no spy IN the campaign". Halper wasn't IN the campaign, it's a linguistic trick designed to fool us because they think we're stupid. They think we're too stupid to do your own research, form our own conclusions. They're wrong. 1
Tiberius Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 53 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: More breaking today... This will not be reported, but is a major development: Peter Strzok's boss, Bill Priestap - the number two guy in the FBI Counter Intelligence Division - visited London in May of 2016... potentially at the same time that Downer was meeting with G-Pap. A full two months before the official opening of the FBI's investigation into the campaign (and just weeks after Rogers actions shuttering the 702 access). Note just yesterday it was reported Bill and two other FBI agents were going to testify finally to the House: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/389189-house-gop-sets-three-fbi-interviews-in-clinton-probe What's not covered in that article is that Priestap will be testifying - in part - about this trip to London. Even more surprising, it's been confirmed to me that Congressional investigators did not even know of the visit until this month... But Horowitz did. That means this information was kept from Congress because it's being used in the criminal referrals and grand jury. Absorb the ramifications of that for a moment. Let's dig in a bit more. How do we know he was in London? Two sources: This was an email about Comey's exoneration of Clinton and was released last year and went virtually unnoticed as it was buried under more headline grabbing texts and emails. But it gives us one bit of confirmation that he was indeed out of town sometime between May 9-13. How do we know it was London? Well, you have to dig through the pages and pages of text messages between Strzok and Page to find this gem: How do we know this was the same time-frame as the G-Pap/Downer meeting? Remember it was this meeting which allegedly sparked "Crossfire Hurricane". The timing of its occurrence is a major fact that so far has never been nailed down. In fact, the DOJ/FBI sources leaking to the NYT (who first broke the story) went out of their way to obscure the exact date: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html Since the NYT broke the story, Chuck Ross has narrowed the timing of the meeting down further with his outstanding reporting. Chuck points to it happening around May 10th: http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/25/alexander-downer-george-papadopoulos-mueller/ Are we to believe it was just a coincidence that the number two man in the FBI-CID was in London at the same time another London meeting took place which led to the opening of the most significant counter intelligence investigation in recent FBI history? Is it just a coincidence that Halper has direct ties to both of these men and also was in London in May? There's more to consider: Remember Priestap is likely a cooperating witness for the IG and has been for months: Unlike the others swept up in this scandal, Bill is still actively running cases: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-fbi-special-agent-pleads-guilty-leaking-classified-national-defense-information That suggests he's been cleared and or cut a sweet deal. Now, after sitting on this bombshell information for months, he's ready to tell Congress more about his story. It's all going to come out. It's all going to explode in the faces of the media and Schiffs of the world who are screaming today "there was no spy IN the campaign". Halper wasn't IN the campaign, it's a linguistic trick designed to fool us because they think we're stupid. They think we're too stupid to do your own research, form our own conclusions. They're wrong. Is the Deep State powerful enough to bring down Trump? Will they do it?
Deranged Rhino Posted May 25, 2018 Author Posted May 25, 2018 They tried. They lost. The evidence is everywhere. 1
Tiberius Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: They tried. They lost. The evidence is everywhere. It's already over? Boo!
njbuff Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 Forget these investigations................... Can Horowitz play OL????? Cause we have a DIRE situation here in Buffalo. ? 1 1
DC Tom Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: They tried. They lost. The evidence is everywhere. I wonder how much Trump has cooperated with Putin to prevent the Deep State bringing him down. I mean...once the election's over and the #Resistance is dedicated to bringing Trump down with Russia cast as the boogeyman, Putin has absolutely no motivation whatsoever to do anything other than conspire with Trump to complete the Nazi takeover of the government, right? 1
B-Man Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 Quote The New YorkerVerified account @NewYorker FollowFollow @NewYorker Experts estimate a 35% chance of a U.S. civil war over the next ten to fifteen years. What do historians think?
row_33 Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 I won’t renew my New Yorker subscription, since 1983, this summer they have totally lost it
Koko78 Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 It will be a short war, since the leftists gave up their guns in the name of safety... That is unless they're complete hypocrites. 1
GG Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Koko78 said: It will be a short war, since the leftists gave up their guns in the name of safety... That is unless they're complete hypocrites. The honest truth is they expect the inner city youth to protect them, since they're the ones with the guns.
3rdnlng Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 29 minutes ago, GG said: The honest truth is they expect the inner city youth to protect them, since they're the ones with the guns. Maybe they're courting those non animals, MS-13 to protect them?
Deranged Rhino Posted May 27, 2018 Author Posted May 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Maybe they're courting those non animals, MS-13 to protect them? Courting, importing, arming, and putting on the payroll for intimidation and assassination purposes... for the past 8 years
DC Tom Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 59 minutes ago, Nanker said: Shades of the Arian Nation pod in Breaking Bad. "Aryan." Don't want to be getting on their bad side, either. 2
4merper4mer Posted May 28, 2018 Posted May 28, 2018 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: "Aryan." Don't want to be getting on their bad side, either. Sorry dude but that ship sailed for you when you discussed Dresden with Kurt Goedel.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 29, 2018 Author Posted May 29, 2018 Here we go... Note, this is the SECOND OIG report. The first is the Hillary email investigation, which hasn't been released yet. If this is scheduled for the 5th, that means they're dropping them back-to-back and we're getting the first report this week. 1 2
njbuff Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Here we go... Note, this is the SECOND OIG report. The first is the Hillary email investigation, which hasn't been released yet. If this is scheduled for the 5th, that means they're dropping them back-to-back and we're getting the first report this week. If you didn't update us and if folks believe FOX is useless................... We wouldn't ever know a damn thing about any of this unless you go to independent outlets. 2
Nanker Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 22 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Here we go... Note, this is the SECOND OIG report. The first is the Hillary email investigation, which hasn't been released yet. If this is scheduled for the 5th, that means they're dropping them back-to-back and we're getting the first report this week. I've marked my calendar. I'll be in Alaska then, but I'm sure we'll be able to get the news. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 31, 2018 Author Posted May 31, 2018 Confirmation FISA abuse is a key part of the upcoming series of reports: https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1805.pdf 1
Recommended Posts