Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 more like liberals are the rubber, Trump is the blow torch willing to melt the crap out of the rubber. What an education...who would have guessed the former director of the fbi would acknowledge being knee deep in political manipulation, admitting to  attempts to influence the outcome of an election and making talk show rounds like jilted debutante-and we all would know about it? 

 

 

 

 

 

NIxon used the FBI/CIA for his intrigues, tried to pit them against each other to coverup illegal payments...

Posted
7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

a story as old as time and governments. power corrupts. 

 

as painful as it is to admit it, that was really really bad....

 

 

 

only a libtard would think it was okey-dokey-artichokey if a Dem President did what Nixon did...

 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Comey's memos to be delivered today: 

 

Big happenings today... setting up for a Friday arrest. 

Amazing if/when the axe falls it cuts deep in to Comey

Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

More on McCabe: 

 

 

 

 

#BREAKING: Justice Department watchdog sends criminal referral on Andrew McCabe to US attorney https://washex.am/2HgXkZ9

 

Huh.

 

This sounds a little … oh we dunno … deep state to us.

 

If only the media had actually paid attention to what was going on with McCabe, right?

 

 

Quote

 

f053ce187d9fe1393f4684ca92c89d74_normal.

 
Great reminder from @AnaCabrera just now: Conservative media promoted the "McCabe is a corrupt deep state actor" idea for many months

 

 
Great reminder that tweets are FOREVER, Brian.
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, garybusey said:

 

:lol:

 

Happy Friday

 

:beer: 

 

Big arrests/indictments happen on Mondays and Fridays. Based on how nutty yesterday's late news cycle was, today is shaping up to be even nuttier. I put it as 70/30 that we have a big move today by either Mueller or Sessions (new indictments announced by Mueller, or McCabe's arrest). 

 

Guessing of course, based on yesterday's tea leaves.

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:beer: 

 

Big arrests/indictments happen on Mondays and Fridays. Based on how nutty yesterday's late news cycle was, today is shaping up to be even nuttier. I put it as 70/30 that we have a big move today by either Mueller or Sessions (new indictments announced by Mueller, or McCabe's arrest). 

 

Guessing of course, based on yesterday's tea leaves.

 

You were positive a month or two ago that Podesta would be the next to be charged. What's your new angle? McCabe then Podesta? Just McCabe?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

You were positive a month or two ago that Podesta would be the next to be charged. What's your new angle? McCabe then Podesta? Just McCabe?

 

By Mueller. He hasn't announced any new indictments since that prediction. 

 

But look what showed up in the news just this week: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-tony-podesta-a-washington-power-broker-lost-it-all-1524065781

 

Why would Tony Podesta, one of the most powerful and successful lobbyists on K-Street find himself near broke and isolated as the article portrays unless he was in serious legal jeopardy? Do you think it's just a coincidence? Unrelated? Or do you think it's possible - if not likely - that Podesta got swept up in the same charges that Mueller nailed Manafort for (those charges are from a period of time when Manafort and Podesta were partners in the Ukraine after all)? 

 

And if you agree that it's possible Tony got swept up in those same charges, why would Mueller (and the DOJ) keep Podesta's name out of the press and keep those indictments sealed for so long?

 

How do you read those tea leaves? Genuinely curious. 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

By Mueller. He hasn't announced any new indictments since that prediction. 

 

But look what showed up in the news just this week: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-tony-podesta-a-washington-power-broker-lost-it-all-1524065781

 

Why would Tony Podesta, one of the most powerful and successful lobbyists on K-Street find himself near broke and isolated as the article portrays unless he was in serious legal jeopardy? Do you think it's just a coincidence? Unrelated? Or do you think it's possible - if not likely - that Podesta got swept up in the same charges that Mueller nailed Manafort for (those charges are from a period of time when Manafort and Podesta were partners in the Ukraine after all)? 

 

How do you read those tea leaves? Genuinely curious. 

 

My take is Podesta will eventually be charged with something minor. I'd guess he is cooperating and that's why we haven't seen his charges. Cooperating about what? Only Mueller knows. I agree he's in serious legal jeopardy.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

AP just reported the DNC is suing Trump, Russia, and Wikileaks for conspiring to fix the 2016 election.

 

This ought to go well...

 

:lol: I saw that. They're suing now because they lost the election... it's hilarious irony considering the last few months of the campaign where HRC and the media were all about Trump not contesting the results. 

1 minute ago, garybusey said:

 

My take is Podesta will eventually be charged with something minor. I'd guess he is cooperating and that's why we haven't seen his charges. Cooperating about what? Only Mueller knows. I agree he's in serious legal jeopardy.

 

 

:beer: Thank you for the answer. 

 

I understand that only Mueller knows, but can we walk this out some more with your best speculation? Not trying to pin you down with a prediction, just trying to gauge your thinking about this a bit more. What, in your mind, could Podesta be cooperating with Mueller about in regards to Trump/Russia? He was never a part of the campaign, he in fact worked for the other side. What could Tony possibly offer in terms of cooperation in your mind when he wasn't involved with the campaign or Trump? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:lol: I saw that. They're suing now because they lost the election... it's hilarious irony considering the last few months of the campaign where HRC and the media were all about Trump not contesting the results. 

 

:beer: Thank you for the answer. 

 

I understand that only Mueller knows, but can we walk this out some more with your best speculation? Not trying to pin you down with a prediction, just trying to gauge your thinking about this a bit more. What, in your mind, could Podesta be cooperating with Mueller about in regards to Trump/Russia? He was never a part of the campaign, he in fact worked for the other side. What could Tony possibly offer in terms of cooperation in your mind when he wasn't involved with the campaign or Trump? 

 

Cooperating in the Manafort investigation. WSJ reported in the past Podesta's work with Manfort violated some govt. regulations.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...