Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Poor Andy... Prison is gonna be tough. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/31/details-of-mccabes-false-statements-surfacing-strong-likelihood-those-lies-show-origin-strzok-and-page-text-messages/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

OK, well, if you’ve followed along closely you can see exactly how busted McCabe is and why he is so busted.

McCabe was was interviewed about the leaks in May 2017.  He denied.  Notice what comes next… “a couple of months later” he was interviewed by IG Horowitz.  And he again denied.  Now think!  That conversation would be around July of 2017.  What happened right after/amid this period?  Answer: Horowitz gained the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages.

•May 2017 McCabe denies leaking for WSJ story (to FBI).

•July(ish) 2017 McCabe denies again (to Horowitz).

•August 2017 Horowitz gets Strzok/Page text messages. Proving McCabe constructed the WSJ story.

•August 2017: After Horowitz gets the proof McCabe was lying – McCabe follows up on the two denials saying “he may have allowed FBI officials to speak with the newspaper”.

•August 2017:  FBI re-interviews McCabe based on new admissions.

•November 29th 2017: One day before SC Mueller indicts Michael Flynn, IG Horowitz interviews McCabe again.  Apparently this time McCabe admitted to constructing the leak.

Gee, is it any wonder why the ‘good guys’ inside the FBI system were pissed off?

image.jpeg

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Poor Andy... Prison is gonna be tough. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/31/details-of-mccabes-false-statements-surfacing-strong-likelihood-those-lies-show-origin-strzok-and-page-text-messages/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

OK, well, if you’ve followed along closely you can see exactly how busted McCabe is and why he is so busted.

McCabe was was interviewed about the leaks in May 2017.  He denied.  Notice what comes next… “a couple of months later” he was interviewed by IG Horowitz.  And he again denied.  Now think!  That conversation would be around July of 2017.  What happened right after/amid this period?  Answer: Horowitz gained the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages.

•May 2017 McCabe denies leaking for WSJ story (to FBI).

•July(ish) 2017 McCabe denies again (to Horowitz).

•August 2017 Horowitz gets Strzok/Page text messages. Proving McCabe constructed the WSJ story.

•August 2017: After Horowitz gets the proof McCabe was lying – McCabe follows up on the two denials saying “he may have allowed FBI officials to speak with the newspaper”.

•August 2017:  FBI re-interviews McCabe based on new admissions.

•November 29th 2017: One day before SC Mueller indicts Michael Flynn, IG Horowitz interviews McCabe again.  Apparently this time McCabe admitted to constructing the leak.

Gee, is it any wonder why the ‘good guys’ inside the FBI system were pissed off?

image.jpeg

When this really get fun, is after people begin to accept McCabe's malfeasance; and the the next show drops:  who McCabe was working for.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

When this really get fun, is after people begin to accept McCabe's malfeasance; and the the next show drops:  who McCabe was working for.  

 

"He was working for Trump and Putin!"

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, KevinRome said:

44 house democrates exempted the Awan bros from background checks. 44. Wow. Now there’s some collusion. 

 

Correct. The sub-article linked in the above is quite good. 

 

This story is going to be a major disaster for a lot of big names. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Correct. The sub-article linked in the above is quite good. 

 

This story is going to be a major disaster for a lot of big names. 

This is going to be a lesson in old school politics. While we know this stuff on a national level we have to hope it gets back to the local levels.  Local media in these locations need to be spreading this about their representatives.

Otherwisebe Jefferson Smith threatening the democracy.

Posted
On 3/31/2018 at 5:51 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

Poor Andy... Prison is gonna be tough. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/31/details-of-mccabes-false-statements-surfacing-strong-likelihood-those-lies-show-origin-strzok-and-page-text-messages/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

OK, well, if you’ve followed along closely you can see exactly how busted McCabe is and why he is so busted.

McCabe was was interviewed about the leaks in May 2017.  He denied.  Notice what comes next… “a couple of months later” he was interviewed by IG Horowitz.  And he again denied.  Now think!  That conversation would be around July of 2017.  What happened right after/amid this period?  Answer: Horowitz gained the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages.

•May 2017 McCabe denies leaking for WSJ story (to FBI).

•July(ish) 2017 McCabe denies again (to Horowitz).

•August 2017 Horowitz gets Strzok/Page text messages. Proving McCabe constructed the WSJ story.

•August 2017: After Horowitz gets the proof McCabe was lying – McCabe follows up on the two denials saying “he may have allowed FBI officials to speak with the newspaper”.

•August 2017:  FBI re-interviews McCabe based on new admissions.

•November 29th 2017: One day before SC Mueller indicts Michael Flynn, IG Horowitz interviews McCabe again.  Apparently this time McCabe admitted to constructing the leak.

Gee, is it any wonder why the ‘good guys’ inside the FBI system were pissed off?

image.jpeg

Are your two weeks up yet? Looks like you are still cherry picking stuff to try and make a case that lying, corrupt, incompetent Donald Trump is really the victim of something, but your promise of real evidence is totally lacking 

Posted
4 hours ago, KevinRome said:

44 house democrates exempted the Awan bros from background checks. 44. Wow. Now there’s some collusion. 

 

No, only a couple did.  The rest (probably 40 or so) just said "Somebody else told me they were already vetted."

Posted (edited)

Misfeasance on the part of many congressmen is certainly a plausible explanation. It just seems weird that so many were only lazy.

 

Did anyone see this article (as DR says, pardon the conservative source - I doubt CNN will report this)? A rep paid someone to do IT services, but that person said that one of the Awans was the actual IT guy. 

Edited by KevinRome
Misspelled word
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Big: Gutierrez won't seek relection: 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/27/gutierrez-illinois-house-democrat-261092

 

Why is his big? his office is where the Awan server was stored. This is a sure sign he's facing criminal indictment soon. He's going to jail. 

Or he knew he was going to lose and is looking for some graft or some type of kickback to essentially surrender the seat.

Posted
Just now, Boyst62 said:

Or he knew he was going to lose and is looking for some graft or some type of kickback to essentially surrender the seat.

 

Trust. 

 

Indictment coming his way. Awan story will be a big death blow for a bunch of congress critters and DNC folk. 

 

DWS is shitting bricks. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Trust. 

 

Indictment coming his way. Awan story will be a big death blow for a bunch of congress critters and DNC folk. 

 

DWS is shitting bricks. 

As much as I hope the edges of those bricks are very sharp and jagged, I don't want to picture this in my mind.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Trust. 

 

Indictment coming his way. Awan story will be a big death blow for a bunch of congress critters and DNC folk. 

 

DWS is shitting bricks. 

I'm skeptical of all of this actually hitting the fan

 

I think the system protects itself. 

 

I think Trump continues to undermine that system to expose it.

 

But it all gets settled without the Public finding out and no charges. 

×
×
  • Create New...