Jump to content

Horowitz's DOJ IG Report


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm still not convinced it hurt all that much.  She was in the public eye for a quarter-century.  How many people hadn't formed an opinion of her by then?

 

NY AG is suing the Trump Foundation for some sort of campaign-related fraud.  

 

That timing is NOT coincidental.

 

but she said she would have won if the election were the day before the Comey fiasco..... 

 

i chose to believe that hurt her....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Stzok wrote in an email it was known foreign actors accessed Clinton's server: 

Dfqm6ghU0AAb6CU.jpg

 

no secret she gave paid access to her emails while Sec of State

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

no secret she gave paid access to her emails while Sec of State

 

It's been denied and called "conspiracy" for years. 

 

But the FBI knew and emailed about it. 

 

We know there were SAPs on her server... that kind of violation - intentional or not - is a serious felony. 

 

***********************

For the squirrels: 

 

Not just "an FBI agent" - the LEAD Counterintelligence investigator and number two man in the CID. Strzok was not just your average special agent, he was leadership in one of the FBI's most powerful divisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's been denied and called "conspiracy" for years. 

 

But the FBI knew and emailed about it. 

 

We know there were SAPs on her server... that kind of violation - intentional or not - is a serious felony. 

 

***********************

For the squirrels: 

 

Not just "an FBI agent" - the LEAD Counterintelligence investigator and number two man in the CID. Strzok was not just your average special agent, he was leadership in one of the FBI's most powerful divisions. 

Who wrote some dumb crap that never happened in a private message to some chick he was banging. 

 

Big whip. Trump is still guilty, this changes nothing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

... Comey is reportedly out of the country today. 

 

Coincidence, I'm sure. :lol: 

Just now, B-Man said:

ISN’T IT WEIRD, THOUGH?

 

 

Screen-Shot-2018-06-14-at-1.00.55-PM-600

 

The fact this was sat on for so long gives me a lot of hope that Horowitz, Sessions, and Huber have been deliberately excluding evidence from Congress which they are using in ongoing grand juries. 

 

This is a good sign. 

 

But yes, people SHOULD be outraged by this. It was always a coup. Always.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Manu (snared in the Wolfe leaking scandal btw) misses the point (intentionally). 

 

Strzok was the HEAD OF BOTH investigations into the MYE and Trump counterintelligence division. He kept Weiner's laptop from Comey and the FBI for FOUR WEEKS before turning it over (what did they scrub first?). Then he was brought over to Mueller's team. Strzok's bias, and admission he'd "stop it" is CRUCIAL to all three investigations. 

 

Dismissing him as a non entity or "just an FBI agent" is dishonest and partisan. 

 

 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Who wrote some dumb crap that never happened in a private message to some chick he was banging. 

 

Big whip. Trump is still guilty, this changes nothing 

 

You must be good at washing clothes with all your spin cycling.

 

You are right, Trump is guilty....................

 

of winning an election and becoming President just to piss off you whiny little leftists who think their safe spaces are going to be invaded by the evil Godzilla-like figure in Trump.

 

WHAH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Manu (snared in the Wolfe leaking scandal btw) misses the point (intentionally). 

 

Strzok was the HEAD OF BOTH investigations into the MYE and Trump counterintelligence division. He kept Weiner's laptop from Comey and the FBI for FOUR WEEKS before turning it over (what did they scrub first?). Then he was brought over to Mueller's team. Strzok's bias, and admission he'd "stop it" is CRUCIAL to all three investigations. 

 

Dismissing him as a non entity or "just an FBI agent" is dishonest and partisan. 

 

As a lot of people have been calling for................

 

This stupid Mueller probe should end......... NOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

Yup. This is exactly why the work done over the past year and a half is so crucial to stopping this kind of dishonest spin. 

 

We know the context because we worked to uncover it. To sort through 400 pages of texts and emails and thousands of hours of testimony and correlated it into a coherent timeline. PPP will be ahead of the curve on a lot of this because we've been covering it and dealing with it for longer than most. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

You must be good at washing clothes with all your spin cycling.

 

You are right, Trump is guilty....................

 

of winning an election and becoming President just to piss off you whiny little leftists who think their safe spaces are going to be invaded by the evil Godzilla-like figure in Trump.

 

WHAH. 

Nope, guilty of Obstruction and conspiracy/"collusion" 

 

You guys are like Pavlov's Dog. The right/Trump stir up an issue, fill your little heads and ever smaller hearts with nonsense and set you guys off to dance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Nope, guilty of Obstruction and conspiracy/"collusion" 

 

You guys are like Pavlov's Dog. The right/Trump stir up an issue, fill your little heads and ever smaller hearts with nonsense and set you guys off to dance 

 

You are such a fu ck ing moron.

 

Trump is a lot of things, but Trump colluding with Russia is the most laughable thing any of you leftist crackheads can come up with.

 

You keep throwing it out there that the Evil Trump is guilty, yet you, like all your leftist buddies, can't provide one shred of evidence.

 

Keep trying Sparky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Comey’s Big Lie When He Exonerated Hillary Clinton

FTA:

 

On July 5, 2016, then-FBI Director James Comey gave a press conference that had one purpose: to salvage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. The FBI had developed information that Hillary Clinton had violated the Espionage Act by her grotesquely cavalier handling of highly classified documents. Were she not “too big to jail,” that is, had she been treated like any other citizen, she would have been indicted. One of the critical tasks he had to perform in order to take a epic breach of trust on the part of Clinton and morph it into a “no harm, no foul” situation was to obfuscate whether foreign intelligence agencies had taken advantage of Clinton’s disregard for national security. This is how he did it:

 

{snip}

 

 

The May 16 date is key because this shows the FBI knew with mathematical certainty that Hillary’s personal communications devices had been penetrated by a foreign actor and they likewise knew that at least one “SECRET” document had been compromised. That that factoid been in Comey’s statement, rather than the utterly deceptive “possible” phrase, then the public would have had an accurate perception of just what the consequences of Clinton’s actions were. Instead, Comey’s lie gave the Clinton campaign the ability to deny that any harm had been done.

 

The IG has apparently found that there were no overt political considerations made by Comey in exonerating Clinton. That appears to be true only insofar as “political” is interpreted as being harmful to Clinton. Because if Comey had either done the job he’d sworn to do or if he’d been honest with the public in his statement, Hillary Clinton’s campaign would have ended in July 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...