Tiberius Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Former CIA director John Brennan’s tweet to Trump (“When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will triumph over you.”)
outsidethebox Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 47 minutes ago, Tiberius said: What's your excuse? Paint chips or glue sniffing? You never have any legitimate points to make at all I think you and boob have been doing to much shotgunning when you get high. Liberalism is your brain on drugs.
row_33 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 that's why they are ignored, why do you waste your time with them? is it fun?
outsidethebox Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: that's why they are ignored, why do you waste your time with them? is it fun? Low hanging fruit. ?
Koko78 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 46 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Former CIA director John Brennan’s tweet to Trump (“When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will triumph over you.”) 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2018 Author Posted March 19, 2018 4 hours ago, Bob in Mich said: I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked. You don't need to wonder. I tried engaging in a reasonable discussion with you, you responded with insults and ignorance. I went hard after you, and then tried to pull back and even apologized for being short to reset the conversation... your response was to hurl more insults and belittling. You brought it on yourself. Of course if you put the blunt down long enough to preserve a short term memory, you'd understand this already. So now when you fling nonsense about this subject (which you've proven and admitted you know nothing about) I stomp on it because what you're pushing is ignorance and you've made it clear you're not interested in having a civil conversation. Get tougher Bob. Or get smarter. Keep spouting ignorance and I'll keep pointing out how shallow your depth of understanding on this topic is.
3rdnlng Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You don't need to wonder. I tried engaging in a reasonable discussion with you, you responded with insults and ignorance. I went hard after you, and then tried to pull back and even apologized for being short to reset the conversation... your response was to hurl more insults and belittling. You brought it on yourself. Of course if you put the blunt down long enough to preserve a short term memory, you'd understand this already. So now when you fling nonsense about this subject (which you've proven and admitted you know nothing about) I stomp on it because what you're pushing is ignorance and you've made it clear you're not interested in having a civil conversation. Get tougher Bob. Or get smarter. Keep spouting ignorance and I'll keep pointing out how shallow your depth of understanding on this topic is. I hate it when you sugar coat things. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2018 Author Posted March 19, 2018 Attorney statement versus the OPR statement. What does this look like to you? It looks to me like CRIMINAL CHARGES SOON for McCabe.
boyst Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Attorney statement versus the OPR statement. What does this look like to you? It looks to me like CRIMINAL CHARGES SOON for McCabe. Which is which specifically to make you believe this? Just trying to get a more solid understanding though it seems pretty basic.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2018 Author Posted March 19, 2018 Just now, Boyst62 said: Which is which specifically to make you believe this? Just trying to get a more solid understanding though it seems pretty basic. By McCabe's attorney's own admission, the DOJ and OIG denied them access to the OIG report. The only explanation for why this would be denied to counsel is if parts of the OIG report were being used by a grand jury in a criminal investigation. If the OIG report - which is done - wasn't being used as evidence in criminal proceedings, they would have had to share it in full with McCabe's attorney.
boyst Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: By McCabe's attorney's own admission, the DOJ and OIG denied them access to the OIG report. The only explanation for why this would be denied to counsel is if parts of the OIG report were being used by a grand jury in a criminal investigation. If the OIG report - which is done - wasn't being used as evidence in criminal proceedings, they would have had to share it in full with McCabe's attorney. That doesn't necessarily mean they'll be charges against McCabe. That could be an indictment against Trump for colluding with Loompaland
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2018 Author Posted March 19, 2018 43 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: That doesn't necessarily mean they'll be charges against McCabe. That could be an indictment against Trump for colluding with Loompaland It does. McCabe's attorney wanted to see everything in the IG report about McCabe, not the entire IG report. He was denied access to other bits about his client likely because McCabe is already in the process of being indicted by a grand jury. We know that Sessions has an outside prosecutor working hand in hand with the IG, he revealed that two weeks ago. It's not in DC, it's not in Virginia. My bet - because Trump loves to troll - is that the grand jury is being held in Little Rock where we know there is an active FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation ongoing. There's no reason to think the IG report has anything to do with team Trump. It began before he was in office and deals with oversight of the DOJ and FBI - the IG doesn't have the authority to investigate Trump or the campaign.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 24, 2018 Author Posted March 24, 2018 https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/russia_report_findings_and_recommendations.pdf Note McCabe's op Ed in WaPo today as well... He knows what's coming.
Nanker Posted March 24, 2018 Posted March 24, 2018 9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/russia_report_findings_and_recommendations.pdf Note McCabe's op Ed in WaPo today as well... He knows what's coming. Here’s McCabe’s sob story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/andrew-mccabe-not-in-my-worst-nightmares-did-i-dream-my-fbi-career-would-end-this-way/2018/03/23/5ff8fd8c-2eb9-11e8-8688-e053ba58f1e4_story.html?utm_term=.ccd4e1f6540e He should look good in orange. 1
Prickly Pete Posted March 24, 2018 Posted March 24, 2018 9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/russia_report_findings_and_recommendations.pdf Note McCabe's op Ed in WaPo today as well... He knows what's coming. The real question is "Why is Russia so much better at psy-op's than the US?" Cuz apparently, they have been able to bring an American presidential election into doubt.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 24, 2018 Author Posted March 24, 2018 59 minutes ago, OJABBA said: The real question is "Why is Russia so much better at psy-op's than the US?" Cuz apparently, they have been able to bring an American presidential election into doubt. Yup. Or, the other question I ask - and get blank looks in return - is if people believe Russia's IC is capable of running such a successful campaign against us, doesn't that mean our own IC is capable of doing the same thing against us? If someone answers no to that question, and yes to your question, it exposes the ignorance or partisanship. Brennan and Clapper were the "Russian" agents trying to muck up our election. Both will be answering for their crimes. 3 2
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2018 Posted March 24, 2018 Ya, more trouble here for Hillary British authorities raided the London offices of data firm Cambridge Analytica late Friday amid allegations the company illegally harvested millions of people’s personal Facebook data to influence U.S. elections. More than a dozen officers from the Information Commissioner’s Office entered the premises after being granted a warrant for the search by a High Court judge. The information watchdog is believed to be probing possible links between the data firm and the UK Brexit referendum after a former employee told British media the data firm “misled” the public while working for Leave.EU, one of the major Brexit campaign groups. The regulator said early Saturday it had gathered evidence from the data firm and will “consider the evidence before deciding the next steps and coming to any conclusions.” Separately, India’s government has also begun scrutinizing the data firm, having sent a notice to the company demanding information on which Indian entities it has worked with and the methods it used to acquire data. READ IT AT ASSOCIATED PRESS
snafu Posted March 24, 2018 Posted March 24, 2018 3 hours ago, Nanker said: Here’s McCabe’s sob story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/andrew-mccabe-not-in-my-worst-nightmares-did-i-dream-my-fbi-career-would-end-this-way/2018/03/23/5ff8fd8c-2eb9-11e8-8688-e053ba58f1e4_story.html?utm_term=.ccd4e1f6540e He should look good in orange. Too long; didn't read. I wish that when I did something wrong I'd have the forum of the Washington Post OpEd page to tell my side.
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2018 Posted March 24, 2018 1 minute ago, snafu said: Too long; didn't read. I wish that when I did something wrong I'd have the forum of the Washington Post OpEd page to tell my side. Get our mentally imbalanced President to rant about you on twitter, then you can do that
Recommended Posts