Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

 

The coincidence is just amazing to me.  So many Republicans with formerly outstanding reputations turned out to be just underhanded criminals, AFTER they got involved investigating Trump. 

 

I mean, what are the odds?  90% of Republicans support Trump.  Like 95 point something percent of Republicans are honest and upstanding (PPP aside) and yet nearly every one of the appointed Republican investigators, is apparently crooked and secretly has it in for Trump. 

 

Either an amazing coincidence or might it possibly be that there are concerted efforts to smear the reputation of anyone that may be called down the road to testify against Trump?  I can hear the defense attorney now, "How can we trust McCabe's testimony?  We know he was fired from the FBI for lying."

 

You've fallen right in line with the talking points of the left.  Hook, line and sinker. 

Posted

Nothing sweeter than reading the panicked words of treasonous prigs who are just starting to realize how truly !@#$ed they are. 

 

It's hilarious when one proven liar who once spied on Congress to keep his illegalities secret coming to the aid of another proven liar and corrupt official without a hint of irony - or honesty:

 

DYgVbcOV4AAGRub.jpg

 

His fall, will be very sweet to watch. And it's coming, John. 

 

Then there's Comey, who got thrown under the bus by McCabe in his statement:


http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/378919-mccabe-just-made-life-tough-for-comey-and-the-special-counsel

Quote

“I chose to share with a reporter through my public affairs officer and a legal counselor,” McCabe stated. “As deputy director, I was one of only a few people who had the authority to do that. It was not a secret, it took place over several days, and others, including the director, were aware of the interaction with the reporter.”

 

If the “interaction” means leaking the information, then McCabe’s statement would seem to directly contradict statements Comey made in a May 2017 congressional hearing. Asked if he had “ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation” or whether he had “ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation,” Comey replied “never” and “no.”

 

 

 

 

Then there's this joker - the most corrupt AG in our lifetimes:

 

 

Note the similarities in all these nervous tweets. They're laying the blame at the feet of Trump when it was an Obama appointee who found the dirt that got McCabe fired. The case is AIRTIGHT against McCabe and the higher ups. How do we know? 

 

 

If THAT'S true and they fired McCabe anyway, then that would mean Sessions has MOUNTAINS of evidence - not just on McCabe, but on all the higher ups he could rat-'n-roll on. 

 

No wonder Mr. Brennan, Mr. Holder, Mr. Comey, and others are lashing out today. They should have picked better conspirators I guess. 

 

And while the rats are lashing out with lies and mindless blather, there's General Flynn hitting the campaign trail in California: 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/17/former-trump-adviser-michael-flynn-hits-campaign-t/

 

Sure doesn't seem like a man who's worried, does he? Almost like he knows what's coming next. 

 

 

image.jpeg

Posted

Pay attention to the "stable genius" when he tweets things like this. He has evidence. Lots of it. He knows what's coming. It's going to be very bad for Mr. Comey and others, even some journos:

 

 

 

 

52dd9c4b977666163298ee6d66de5e3fd35382a490b103604ee1bb5d0dc8d5f2.jpg

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Breaking News!!!

 

SNL takes the first 2 minutes of it's opening last night for Sessions to explain it all.  Kate McKinnon does a pretty good Sessions

 

SNL Youtube from 3/17

I see you've done your weekly homework and caught up on all the news.

Posted

You would do well to just go to the movies a lot more. 

On 3/17/2018 at 3:56 AM, Bob in Mich said:

 

 

The coincidence is just amazing to me.  So many Republicans with formerly outstanding reputations turned out to be just underhanded criminals, AFTER they got involved investigating Trump. 

WTF are you talking about? Please name some of the "so many Republicans" who investigated Trump. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

We are watching a movie... and the best movies have twist endings. 

 

Yes. "The Sting" was one, but I think my favorite movie with a twist was "Witness For The Prosecution". (not that I was born when it was made)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

We are watching a movie... and the best movies have twist endings. 

 

 

Honestly, I don't want my President saying "not fair" (even if it might seem that way).  It is what petulant 5 year olds do.  It's annoying when the kid does it, and more so when a septuagenarian does it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Nanker said:

You would do well to just go to the movies a lot more. 

WTF are you talking about? Please name some of the "so many Republicans" who investigated Trump. 

 

He can't. He has to wait for the "professionals" at YT to tell him what to think. 

 

Bob has admitted more than once he happily outsources his own free thinking to those "professionals". It's an admission most would hesitate to make openly, but Bob flaunts it like a badge of honor. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Honestly, I don't want my President saying "not fair" (even if it might seem that way).  It is what petulant 5 year olds do.  It's annoying when the kid does it, and more so when a septuagenarian does it.

Agreed. It was cringe worthy and pissed me off whenever Obama trotted out his dogmatic "fair share" lingo, and Trump doesn't wear that well either. 

 

That said, I've always wondered about the makeup of Mueller's team. Seems like they've hired a team of Red Sox players to investigate The Yankees clubhouse. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nanker said:

Agreed. It was cringe worthy and pissed me off whenever Obama trotted out his dogmatic "fair share" lingo, and Trump doesn't wear that well either. 

 

That said, I've always wondered about the makeup of Mueller's team. Seems like they've hired a team of Red Sox players to investigate The Yankees clubhouse. 

That's because, well.............................................................damn Yankees! I'm sure I could be impartial sitting on a jury for that football team from Massachusetts.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nanker said:

 

WTF are you talking about? Please name some of the "so many Republicans" who investigated Trump. 

 

Boy, you guys got me again.  I guess there really are none.   Gosh, why must I lie so much?

 

Hmmm, well, how bout Mueller or even Mitch Cumstein for starters? 

Posted
Just now, Bob in Mich said:

 

Boy, you guys got me again.  I guess there really are none.   Gosh, why must I lie so much?

 

Hmmm, well, how bout Mueller or even Mitch Cumstein for starters? 

 

Only partisan hacks, like yourself, approach this as a LvR thing. 

 

It's never been about left versus right - it's about right and wrong. That's why you're so lost in this conversation and have to rely on paid propagandists like the Young Turks to get your news. 

Posted

Moron, DR, have you noticed I don't ever quote you or respond to you for like a month now?  That is because I view you as the wild eyed fukstick at the end of the bar.  I made the mistake of making eye contact once and you have been a complete confrontational jerk since that day.  Never again, you !@#$ing lunatic.   Back on ignore.  Out.

 

By the way, The young Turks has a live Youtube show weeknights from 6-8pm eastern.  Check it out.  You'll love it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Moron, DR, have you noticed I don't ever quote you or respond to you for like a month now?  That is because I view you as the wild eyed fukstick at the end of the bar.  I made the mistake of making eye contact once and you have been a complete confrontational jerk since that day.  Never again, you !@#$ing lunatic.   Back on ignore.  Out.

 

By the way, The young Turks has a live Youtube show weeknights from 6-8pm eastern.  Check it out.  You'll love it.

 

Oh yeah, they are credible. The same people that got destroyed in debates with Ben Shapiro and Ann Coulter. Oh yeah, they are credible.

 

Chunk Yogurt....... the guy who eats bacon grease is a real credible source, isn't he.

 

Point is, leftist awanna slam people like Hannity, but think The Young Jerks are credible. Yep, makes sense.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Moron, DR, have you noticed I don't ever quote you or respond to you for like a month now?  That is because I view you as the wild eyed fukstick at the end of the bar.  I made the mistake of making eye contact once and you have been a complete confrontational jerk since that day.  Never again, you !@#$ing lunatic.   Back on ignore.  Out.

 

By the way, The young Turks has a live Youtube show weeknights from 6-8pm eastern.  Check it out.  You'll love it.

 

I do notice. But I don't care. I expose your idiocy when appropriate because it's dangerous. You've been shilled so hard you don't even realize that you're a useful idiot for people who wish to see you kept deaf, dumb, and blind. 

 

And I know the Young Turks. I work in Hollywood where they wish they could be. How do I know that? Because they're star-fukkers. They're hacks - as they've conclusively demonstrated to me during several conversations I've had with them. 

×
×
  • Create New...