Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

i believe it was a credible admission....

 

how could one expect that something like that would take over the minds of the media and DNC?

 

i haven't heard 4chan try another claim to a hoax since then, haven't been looking for it either...

 

 

 

They have. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

They have. 

 

i think i can live without finding out what happened, thanks for the update though!

Posted
53 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

i think i can live without finding out what happened, thanks for the update though!

If I get time and you remind me I'll update you on 4chan. It's full of pussies emulated by the worst trolls here. It's sad. Anonymous is dead, too.

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

:lol:...............like everyone with a brain didn't know it was B.S. from the beginning.

 

Golden shower? Trump dossier authors doubt their most explosive allegation
by Byron York

 

Original Article

 

 

The most explosive allegations of the Trump-Russia affair are in the Trump dossier. And the most explosive allegation in the Trump dossier is the tale of Donald Trump, in a Moscow hotel room in 2013, allegedly watching as prostitutes performed a "golden showers" routine on a bed once occupied by former President Barack Obama as hidden cameras rolled.

 

But now there is new reporting to suggest the dossier's creators had serious doubts about the veracity of the "golden showers" story from the very beginning. Despite those doubts, dossier author Christopher Steele included the "golden showers" account in his collection of anti-Trump intelligence, and the dubious charges set off a series of events that changed the course of the Trump-Russia investigation.

 

Even amid the various allegations of Trump-Russia connections, it was the "golden showers" episode that most excited those involved in the Clinton campaign-funded effort to find Russian dirt on Trump. It was the story that most excited those in the Obama administration who learned about it. (According to a new book, former national security adviser Susan Rice urged Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to "tell Obama about the 'golden showers' allegation.") At the same time, it deeply disturbed Trump. And, of course, it excited the ranks of Trump resisters on Twitter and elsewhere who long for video evidence; just look up #peepeetape.

 

{snip}

 

Now, a new book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, by reporters Michael Isikoff and David Corn — both of whom were personally briefed by Steele as part of the Fusion GPS effort to publicize the dossier's allegations before the election — casts serious doubt on the truthfulness of the "golden showers" story.

 

 

What!

That's the only allegation I was hoping was true.

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

What is is that Trump is guilty of doing? 

 

Obstruction of Justice

 

Maybe collusion. It's currently being investigated by Mr Mueller.

Posted

Some.major liberals at a bar last night. Spoke to them a lot. They hate Trump.  Say sessions is going to be fired, they know it.  They just know. And they say tillerson was fired because Russia.  And the best Korea is a smoke and mirrors game by the media   etc

 

Sooo mich Kool aid.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

sessions activated.png

About 10 hours to go for him to sack McCabe. I don't think he's going to do it. He's a softie and the DOJ bowels are grumbling. 

 

I think Sessions is gone if he doesn't fire McCabe OR doesn't appoint a second Special Counsel. 

Edited by Nanker
Ex Post Cogito
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nanker said:

About 10 hours to go for him to sack McCabe. I don't think he's going to do it. He's a softie and the DOJ bowels are grumbling. 

 

I think Sessions is gone if he doesn't fire McCabe OR doesn't appoint a second Special Counsel. 

 

Speaking of... this was an interesting interview last night with Grassley and Graham: 

 

 

There are a couple things that jumped out at me, but the biggest came from Grassley near the end. Baier asked the senators about the chances of getting a second special counsel appointed. Grassley's answer jumped out:

 

"I'm gonna use as much leverage as I can, and I think I have a lot, to get the job done."

 

DYXs18_VoAASjpF.jpg

 

....

 

 

That's perhaps the most badass example of an understatement as I've ever heard... 

 

It's an understatement because we KNOW Grassley has loads of leverage at this point even without the additional ammunition of the forthcoming IG report. But the mention of leverage spurred a thought about McCabe's visit to the DOJ:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-official-andrew-mccabe-asks-justice-department-not-to-fire-him/2018/03/15/f3f220c0-2871-11e8-b79d-f3d931db7f68_story.html?utm_term=.abb29d789979

 

Was McCabe really there to ask the DOJ not to fire him? Or was leverage being deployed by Sessions?

 

Without that pension it's going to be tough for McCabe to cover the legal fees which are coming whether or not he's fired. Perhaps Sessions wanted to remind Andy face-to-face just how expensive and painful the next several months are going to be for him, and how he can reduce some of that by cooperating more fully with what's to come... 

 

... Just thinking out loud It's speculation - and we'll find out soon one way or the other. Either way though it's largely irrelevant. The evidence is overwhelming with or without McCabe's cooperation. 

 

Today is going to be really interesting. 

 

image.jpeg.e1e5cd5cca9c95bc0d9abb6986ebd4c9.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...