Deranged Rhino Posted February 12, 2018 Author Posted February 12, 2018 Click on the tweet for more in his thread... (The hits just keep on coming...)
B-Man Posted February 12, 2018 Posted February 12, 2018 One wonders what Susan Rice and her colleagues were doing between Jan. 5 and Jan. 20 at noon that made her think she needed to blast out a quick CYA e-mail moments before Trump became president. . 2
Deranged Rhino Posted February 12, 2018 Author Posted February 12, 2018 https://saraacarter.com/fbi-agents-texts-suggest-use-unsecured-messages-discuss-classified-information/ Quote In the January 15, 2016 text messages below, Page discusses with Strzok what is known in the intelligence community as a “single source,” information which in the intelligence community is considered a highly classified and protected source. Additionally, the two agents discuss talking about the “single source” through their unsecure iMessage app. Sending texts through iMessage, a chat service provided by Apple Inc., was again a point of discussion between the two in the text messages dated later in the year August 2016. In those August 2016 text messages, the agents said using the Apple iPhones would help keep their text messages from government collection after speaking with the FBI’s IT director, as reported earlier. And what happened on January 14th 2016 - the day before these texts? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html Quote Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP). That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.
Deranged Rhino Posted February 12, 2018 Author Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: One wonders what Susan Rice and her colleagues were doing between Jan. 5 and Jan. 20 at noon that made her think she needed to blast out a quick CYA e-mail moments before Trump became president. This is a major development. Rice wrote this email (to herself) which said Obama wanted the FBI investigation to be "by the book". So, if Grassley calls her to testify, she can point to this and say, "see, 44 wanted it all done by the book". But thanks to Horowitz's work, and the well thought out roll out of evidence we've already seen, we already know this is not true. How?: Which the right said was about the HRC email investigation (which was closed already), and the left said, "nah it's about the Russian investigation". And now Rice's email (to herself, for no purpose) makes it clear that 44 wanted the Russian investigation to be "by the book". Here's the rub. FBI Investigations are supposed to confidential. And now we know, because the left's leaders on the Hill and 44's own people said so, that Obama wanted to be kept in the loop. Once you prove Obama was involved in the Russian investigation it's game over. Tying him to it will sink him and everyone he used to keep himself in the loop on the investigation. The left will now scream he was just "following" the investigation... but in reality we know he was ordering the FBI to report to him on their investigation into a political opponent. Here's the primary source for Grassley's letter to Rice: https://www.scribd.com/document/371382226/Chuck-Grassley-Letter-to-Susan-Rice Notice the first footnote in Grassley's letter. It discusses a CNN story on 1/12/17 (familiar date, no? That's the same date Ignatius's article hit the WaPo about Flynn's phone call with Kislyak)... which was two days after this gem: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4644049/al-franken-questions-jeff-sessions and just a few days after the now debunked DNI https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf ) I point this out to show again, there was a coordinated effort going on that included the USIC, the DNC, the Washington Post, CNN, FBI, DOJ, and 44's administration to give life to this Russian narrative. Edited February 12, 2018 by Deranged Rhino 1
B-Man Posted February 13, 2018 Posted February 13, 2018 Report: Nunes to Target Former CIA Director John Brennan Next in RussiaGate Probe. . 1
Deranged Rhino Posted February 13, 2018 Author Posted February 13, 2018 My, my... Byron York: Comey told Congress FBI agents didn't think Michael Flynn lied http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-comey-told-congress-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied/article/2648896 ...and, YUP. 1
Tiberius Posted February 13, 2018 Posted February 13, 2018 15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Click on the tweet for more in his thread... (The hits just keep on coming...) This was the meeting where Obama and others didn't know if they could trust Trump officials with info on Russia? What? Like he'd show the Russian ambassador totally top secret information or something?
Deranged Rhino Posted February 13, 2018 Author Posted February 13, 2018 Quote Former CIA field operations officer Gene Coyle, a 30-year agency veteran who served under Brennan, said he was "known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.” "I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says,” he added. Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections. Several weeks before the vote, he said, “Brennan made it very clear that he was a supporter of candidate Clinton, hoping he would be rewarded with being kept on in her administration.” (Brennan is a liberal Democrat. In fact, at the height of the Cold War in 1976, he voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.) https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/11/former_cia_director_john_brennan_investigated_for_perjury.html Good read.
TtownBillsFan Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 On 2/10/2018 at 8:08 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Polls are iron-clad. They cannot be manipulated and represent the attitudes of the American populace to +\- 0.0%. I defy you to find one time....one single time in the past 5 years where polling data was inconsistent with the outcome of any election. LOL, awesome point On 2/10/2018 at 10:39 PM, row_33 said: Never been a real left political force in the US, a comedian telling jokes against Fundamentalists or people a tad conservative is not a lefty but hey you can call yourself whatever in America and we’ll all have to agree or go to jail for a hate crime..... Every single electable US politician, with the exception of some crazed very local events, has always been and will always be a classical liberal. your country is fortunate to be spared lefty forces in politics.... Okay, WTF do you think HIllary and Barrack and their ilk are? Dude, you're looney tunes if you think they're not left. Perhaps, again, the definition of words are being tweaked. I define left as communist/socialist. The Cloward/Piven strategy. If you don't think that's what's going on in the US with the Hillarys and the Barracks of the world, you're missing something. On 2/12/2018 at 10:41 AM, Tiberius said: Repeating Trump's lies? It's been proven as true, by FBI info dumps. It's PROVEN that he was tapped. How are you, STILL, denying this? Good lord, I hope in the next page or two that I haven't read yet, you finally see the truth. I'm not holding out hope, though.
TtownBillsFan Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 On 2/12/2018 at 11:35 AM, Cugalabanza said: I understand all this about the warrant & FISA and the hops. But is there any concrete evidence that Trump was bugged? I think the answer to the question remains (for now) NO. Of course, that may very well change, but it's still in the status of supposition as of right now. Well, the right is fond of saying "show me the concrete proof" on the subject of Russian collusion. And they're right to say that. This is the same thing. Supposition vs. proof. I think we have to wait for some things to come to light. I've read you, and I hope that, when the PROOF that you're looking for actually comes out (I honestly believe it will), you will have the consistency to say you were wrong, we were right all along, and the left that (the one you claim not to be a part of) leads that party are a bunch of scumbags. AND, you're wrong for having doubted it all along. AND, you'll open your head and be more trusting of our side in the future. Deal?
3rdnlng Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 30 minutes ago, TtownBillsFan said: I've read you, and I hope that, when the PROOF that you're looking for actually comes out (I honestly believe it will), you will have the consistency to say you were wrong, we were right all along, and the left that (the one you claim not to be a part of) leads that party are a bunch of scumbags. AND, you're wrong for having doubted it all along. AND, you'll open your head and be more trusting of our side in the future. Deal? Sorry, but your expectations are a little too ambitious. The left and their supporters will never admit to their wrong thoughts.
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 23 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: wrong thoughts. Careful there.
Tiberius Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 7 hours ago, TtownBillsFan said: It's PROVEN that he was tapped. How are you, STILL, denying this? Good lord, I hope in the next page or two that I haven't read yet, you finally see the truth. I'm not holding out hope, though. If Trump says it must be true? Seems that's how many, if not most, of you Trumpbots think 13 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/11/former_cia_director_john_brennan_investigated_for_perjury.html Good read. Are they the ones showing top secret info to the Russians? Oh no, that was Trump 1
Deranged Rhino Posted February 14, 2018 Author Posted February 14, 2018 I can think of a number of reasons why... ********************** This is the man many on the left have been holding up as a paragon of virtue. The man who started this whole narrative. The man many on the left have lauded as being a defender of our country, a defender of the principles this country represents. Well, here he is lying to Congress. Again. Justice is coming for you, John. All your skeletons will be exposed. All the ways in which you weakened this country, sold out the men and women who protect it, how you violated each and every oath you swore, all to line your pockets. It's alllllllll coming out. Enjoy it. You've earned every bit of it. 1
B-Man Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 Why Susan Rice Wrote an Email To Herself by John Hinderaker Original Article Scott wrote this morning about the extraordinary email that National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017, within minutes of when President Trump was inaugurated. It must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)? If you read the email, which Scott posted along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d? .
Deranged Rhino Posted February 14, 2018 Author Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) We know it wasn't a hack. It's been forensically proven. The DNC material was LEAKED. Though admitting as much would be a silver bullet to the entire "Russia hacked the election" narrative. The only people who are still pushing the DNC was "hacked" narrative are either partisan, selling you something, ignorant of the facts, or flat out lying to you. Use your discernment to figure out which. **************************************************** 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Why Susan Rice Wrote an Email To Herself by John Hinderaker Original Article Scott wrote this morning about the extraordinary email that National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017, within minutes of when President Trump was inaugurated. It must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)? If you read the email, which Scott posted along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d? . There's another scenario here, which to me has more weight. Namely, the way this memo was written (it was written to stand out), how it was "suddenly" discovered by Grassley, and Rice's own history with being thrown under the bus by 44 (see Benghazi) - it's possible Rice flipped in the last week of the Obama administration. This CYA email was a shot at 44's stance that he "never interfered with any FBI investigations". In conjunction with the Page/Strzok tweets about 44 wanting to be updated on everything they were doing regarding Russia, it proves 44 lied. It proves he was up to his elbows in all of this. Through that connection, the rest of the house of cards which was running this scheme will fall (Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Holder, HRC, McCain et al). Remember Strzok and Page texts in late 16 talked about someone inside their "small group" flipping. My money is on Rice (and Bill P). It will be interesting to see how this shakes out. Edited February 14, 2018 by Deranged Rhino separated posts
B-Man Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 More fun and games for the dimwits. Schiff: We´re not going to revise Democratic memo The Hill [Washington, DC], by Brett Samuels Original Article BREAKING: Senator Adam Schiff will not be making any revisions to the Democratic memo Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday night that members of his party won’t revise their countermemo, despite requests from the White House to do so. ......"don't make me hold my breath" 1
Tiberius Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Why Susan Rice Wrote an Email To Herself by John Hinderaker Original Article Scott wrote this morning about the extraordinary email that National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017, within minutes of when President Trump was inaugurated. It must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)? If you read the email, which Scott posted along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d? . After the big flop of the Nunes memo--pushed by paid posters and Russian bots--I guess this is the next sinister hobgoblin you guys are out pushing.
keepthefaith Posted February 14, 2018 Posted February 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I can think of a number of reasons why... ********************** This is the man many on the left have been holding up as a paragon of virtue. The man who started this whole narrative. The man many on the left have lauded as being a defender of our country, a defender of the principles this country represents. Well, here he is lying to Congress. Again. Justice is coming for you, John. All your skeletons will be exposed. All the ways in which you weakened this country, sold out the men and women who protect it, how you violated each and every oath you swore, all to line your pockets. It's alllllllll coming out. Enjoy it. You've earned every bit of it. That testimony from Brennan is breathtaking and obviously Gowdy knows he's full of crap.
Deranged Rhino Posted February 14, 2018 Author Posted February 14, 2018 27 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: That testimony from Brennan is breathtaking and obviously Gowdy knows he's full of crap. Agreed. Gowdy's facial expression is priceless. And again, for any of those folks who have been propping up Clapper and Brennan as being "professionals who know more than we do and thus deserve our respect" consider this clip closely. Then ask yourself how many times do we need to prove Clapper and Brennan are liars before you stop taking their words as truth without evidence?
Recommended Posts