Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, I get you silly point. You are saying the Clinton's are behind the investigation. What's the basis of that stupid nonsense? 

What don't you understand here? Clinton and her cabal started this whole Russia/Trump thing back during the election. It's almost laughable since the Clintons were the ones that had the Russia connections. BTW, you are a !@#$ing idiot.

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

What don't you understand here? Clinton and her cabal started this whole Russia/Trump thing back during the election. It's almost laughable since the Clintons were the ones that had the Russia connections. BTW, you are a !@#$ing idiot.

 

CLINTONS DID IT!

Posted
3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

What don't you understand here? Clinton and her cabal started this whole Russia/Trump thing back during the election. It's almost laughable since the Clintons were the ones that had the Russia connections. BTW, you are a !@#$ing idiot.

That's what they are saying on Fox, I understand that. So is Mueller a Clinton puppet or something? Comey who announced the re-opening of the stupid email crap is also? How far does this conspiracy stretch? 

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

You are a really bad poster. But to your credit, you've got the clown act down pretty well.

 

You're an amazing poster. The best poster. 

Can I frame and hang you in my room?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

You're an amazing poster. The best poster. 

Can I frame and hang you in my room?

 

Here a picture of him you can frame:

 

be6e28dc49a8a7cc4bd7319ddb1e28b9--unicor

 

(Sorry 3rd, I couldn't resist...)

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Oh, hello, Barrack. I was wondering when we'd finally get to you officially. 

 

I see no evidence of the context in the tweet. Point me to the text messages that give context to this one, please.

Posted
6 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

I see no evidence of the context in the tweet. Point me to the text messages that give context to this one, please.

 

So, NOW context matters?

Posted
Just now, garybusey said:

 

Seriously. That was an interesting development. It was related to the thread topic.

 

But devoid of full context

×
×
  • Create New...