Nunes Memo to be Released

[Deranged Rhino]

If you're still doubting that there is a major roll out plan in the works here, please look into Grassley's upcoming memo. 

 

It'll be followed by Goodlatte. 

 

Then Horowitz. 

 

We are just at the start here. There will be much, much, much more to come. We literally were a breath away from losing our democratic republic. That's not hyperbole. That's becoming more apparent by the day. 

 

***********************************

 

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

If you're still doubting that there is a major roll out plan in the works here, please look into Grassley's upcoming memo. 

 

It'll be followed by Goodlatte. 

 

Then Horowitz. 

 

We are just at the start here. There will be much, much, much more to come. We literally were a breath away from losing our democratic republic. That's not hyperbole. That's becoming more apparent by the day. 

 

***********************************

 

So we are already forgetting this memo?? Omg! It's not even six hours old and you want us focusing on the next one?!?!? 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

Nunes being interviewed right now, just called Comey out for lying in his testimony. 

 

That giant better start running.

 

********************

 

[row_33]

Grassley is the best

 

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, Capco said:

Some of you have your heads on straight. 

 

Most of you are completely $@&%*ng bonkers.  

 

It's genuinely sad.  

 

Thank you.  It's been a while since we've been collectively psychoanalyzed by a brand new, ignorant !@#$wit.

[Wacka]

Tibs trying to explain all this Schiiff away  reminds me of a five year old explaining  how mom's vase broke.

[Deranged Rhino]

Some of the early spin is going to end up backfiring badly. First example:

 

 

This is a demonstrable lie. 

 

The memo says known compromised agent Strzok began investigating Papadopoulos in July of 2016. People are jumping on this as proof the memo is a nothingburger. 

 

But it's a trap - and untrue. 

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445504/obama-camp-disingenuous-denials-fisa-surveillance-trump

Quote

In June, the Obama Justice Department submitted an application that apparently “named” Trump in addition to some of his associates. As I have stressed, it is unclear whether “named” in this context indicates that Trump himself was cited as a person the Justice Department was alleging was a Russian agent whom it wanted to surveil. It could instead mean that Trump’s name was merely mentioned in an application that sought to conduct surveillance on other alleged Russian agents.

 

We KNOW 44 tried to get FISA warrants on 4 Trump officials in JUNE. 

 

June comes before July, doesn't it, Chris? 

 

What the memo shows is that after trying (and failing) in June to get a FISA warrant (after losing access in April), the DOJ tried to use Papadopoulos as cause for a FISA and that failed too. It wasn't until the dossier was created and bolstered through circular reporting in the MSM that they got the warrant. 

 

The trap of it all is the MSM is going to latch onto this as a talking point assuming it's all the evidence Nunes has... because no one is looking down the line and seeing the train coming down the !@#$ing tracks:

 

 

This is going to be fun to watch.

 

 

 

*********************

Nunes interview:

 

 

********************************************

 

[Deranged Rhino]

**************************

 

They want a revolution... because the House Intelligence Committee exposed abuse of the federal surveillance system which was violating the constitutional protections of American citizens in the name of political opposition research.

 

 

If they really want to take it to the streets, they'll lose.  

[boyst]

2 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

It's pretty tough to argue detail like that. You sure told us, boy howdy.

God damn good band, right there, son.

 

 

Edited February 3, 2018 by Boyst62

[TakeYouToTasker]

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

**************************

 

They want a revolution... because the House Intelligence Committee exposed abuse of the federal surveillance system which was violating the constitutional protections of American citizens in the name of political opposition research.

 

 

If they really want to take it to the streets, they'll lose.  

Those are marching orders which lead directly to the end of a rope, and they came from "somewhere".  Those responsible for issuing an order like that must know that their time is near if this is being introduced.

[Deranged Rhino]

Something to consider... 

 

 

The FISA had to be renewed every 90 days. It was renewed twice after Trump was elected. 

 

We know Trump was being spied on during the campaign, during the transition, and after being sworn in. That extends WELL beyond the scope of Page's involvement with the campaign or Trump himself. But this roll out HAD to start with Page. 

 

Why? Because it's crucial to establish the original FISA was established crookedly and used to EXPAND the scope of the surveillance beyond Page. 

 

This upcoming week will be a beat down of this narrative, until the left/MSM throws up their hands and exclaims "We get it, they LIED to the court about the dossier to get the warrant. Who cares?!"

 

Then through Grassley and Horowitz the other bomb gets dropped: all the other Trump officials they were spying on without FISA warrants. 

 

And of course, the fact the warrant was approved twice after the election moves this into sedition territory.

 

5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Those are marching orders which lead directly to the end of a rope, and they came from "somewhere".  Those responsible for issuing an order like that must know that their time is near if this is being introduced.

 

That's how I read it.

[Capco]

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Thank you.  It's been a while since we've been collectively psychoanalyzed by a brand new, ignorant !@#$wit.

 

You're welcome, moron.  

[Deranged Rhino]

One more thing on the whole Carter Page being "it" talking point. 

 

Remember this? 

 

Watch it again with what we know now. 

 

Notice he said TRUMP TRANSITION TEAM MEMBERS. 

 

Page was never on the transition team. 

 

This is going to go well beyond Page. It's going to expose that other Americans were spied upon without a FISA. That's going to get people thrown in prison. Not white collar jail either. But federal pound you in the ass prison:

 

[Cinga]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The FISA had to be renewed every 90 days. It was renewed twice after Trump was elected.

Yup.... thought about that on the way home but hadn't posted it yet... Not only the timeline, but that both Yates and Rosenstein signed off on it

[B-Man]

# ALL MEMOS MATTER

 

 

 

 

Stephen Miller‏Verified account @redsteeze 7h7 hours ago

The good news is we get to do this all over again tomorrow

 

 

 

 

 

.

Edited February 3, 2018 by B-Man

[Deranged Rhino]

8 minutes ago, Cinga said:

Yup.... thought about that on the way home but hadn't posted it yet... Not only the timeline, but that both Yates and Rosenstein signed off on it

 

 

 

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

# ALL MEMOS MATTER

 

[B-Man]

If you’re rich enough to cook up a “dossier” and powerful enough to know the right people, you too can have the government spy for you.

 

Is that precedent ok with everyone?

 

 

 

FISA Abuse Memo Proves The Need For An Independent Investigation

by David Harsanyi

 

Until then, no one will be satisfied.

 

Democrats are right. The validity of the 2016 presidential contest is in question. Until we get to the bottom of what the FBI was up to during the election, questions about it will fester and further degrade trust in the institution.

 

The notion peddled by Democrats over the past few days, that releasing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes’s memo would irreparably damage national security, has been proven absurd. There’s no reason the public shouldn’t have an accounting of what went on. And there’s no reason an investigation into the FBI’s actions should undermine Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian collusion — or whatever he’s looking into at this point (even if this is the purpose of some GOP partisans). It might even insulate it.

MORE AT THE LINK:

 

 

 

 

 

[jrober38]

This whole thing is a joke.  The Democrats are so corrupt it's out of control. 

 

It all started with Hilary. They rigged the primaries for her, and were so convinced she'd beat Trump they broke laws to give her advantages over her opponent thinking they'd never get caught because Hilary would win. Turns out she was a terrible candidate who no one liked and she lost. Now they're left holding the bag. 

 

Heads need to roll and people need to go to jail. The corruption in Washington (on both sides) is outrageous and there needs to be real accountability. 

[TakeYouToTasker]

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Something to consider... 

 

 

The FISA had to be renewed every 90 days. It was renewed twice after Trump was elected. 

 

We know Trump was being spied on during the campaign, during the transition, and after being sworn in. That extends WELL beyond the scope of Page's involvement with the campaign or Trump himself. But this roll out HAD to start with Page. 

 

Why? Because it's crucial to establish the original FISA was established crookedly and used to EXPAND the scope of the surveillance beyond Page. 

 

This upcoming week will be a beat down of this narrative, until the left/MSM throws up their hands and exclaims "We get it, they LIED to the court about the dossier to get the warrant. Who cares?!"

 

Then through Grassley and Horowitz the other bomb gets dropped: all the other Trump officials they were spying on without FISA warrants. 

 

And of course, the fact the warrant was approved twice after the election moves this into sedition territory.

The constant leaks of closed door meetings early in his Presidency, which led to distrust and infighting over the leak sources, portrayed in the media as signs of incompetence has a very different feel to it suddenly.

 

That would be the use of gathered intelligence to directly impede the President's ability to govern, and force him out of office.

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

11 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

The constant leaks of closed door meetings early in his Presidency, which led to distrust and infighting over the leak sources, portrayed in the media as signs of incompetence has a very different feel to it suddenly.

 

That would be the use of gathered intelligence to directly impede the President's ability to govern, and force him out of office.

 

 

 

100% It's a bit of strategic distraction. 

 

My contention (as you know) has been that while these people in the DOJ were actively conspiring against POTUS (McCabe, Comey, Strzok, Page, Preistap, Baker, et al) - Flynn and Rogers were spying on them. Difference is, one was legal - the other not. They were identifying targets, inside the media, Congress, DOJ, FBI, CIA - moving to isolate and expose each and every one.