Nanker Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 True, but it certainly gained traction after she lost. It was the only - albeit pathetic - excuse they could muster about why she was defeated. She and they could not face the reality that she was the most disliked person in the race, that she was ill, lazy, felt entitled, and basically mailed in her campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, Nanker said: True, but it certainly gained traction after she lost. It was the only - albeit pathetic - excuse they could muster about why she was defeated. She and they could not face the reality that she was the most disliked person in the race, that she was ill, lazy, felt entitled, and basically mailed in her campaign. #ThankGod The miracle Trump win was a direct result of that Witch taking victory laps all during the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Further reminder: The "Russia's hacking the election story" dates back to July 2016, at least. It was not the "major unreported story of the campaign." Dates back to June 15th to be precise. Exactly when the DNC, FBI, DOJ and 44 were trying to cover their asses for prior abuses of the 702 quarry system which both CrowdStrike and Fusion GPS had unfettered access to until April '16. You can clearly see WHY the dossier was created when examining this timeline. Posting this timeline again because it's crucial: On 1/29/2018 at 2:35 PM, Deranged Rhino said: ... The dossier did not exist in April '16. The "Russian collusion" narrative did not either. Both started on June 15th, 2016 - the same day. This is NOT a coincidence look at the timeline: Unknown start date - April 2016: Fusion GPS/CrowdStrike/HRC's campaign have full access to raw 702 data without oversight through McCabe/Priestap/Baker/Ohr at the FBI. Fusion GPS had been doing oppo research for a long time before April 2016. April 2016: Rogers shuts down this access and asks for explanations into previous 702 quarries. April - June 9th: Black hats at DOJ, FBI, CIA and the 44 Administration along with HRC campaign have to come up with probable cause to explain their past 702 abuses AND get an actual FISA warrant to continue spying on Trump. They're confident in her victory (because they're rigging it), so they come up with a plan to generate cause. June 9th 2016: Don Jr has the infamous meeting with Veselnitskaya in Trump Towers. Veselnitskaya was denied a visa originally but had that denial overturned by 44's administration at the last minute, making the meeting possible. She is working with Fusion GPS on the Magnitsky case with Prevezon and against Browder. Meaning this whole thing is arranged by ALL the elements who are trying to cover their ass: CIA, 44, FBI, DOJ, Fusion GPS, HRC and the DNC by extension. Also, she meets with Simpson the day before and the day after, as per his testimony, though he says he can not speak to her because she doesnt speak English. June 15th: Big day with two big happenings which are all connected- * Fusion GPS hires Steele. (Dossier still does not exist, still not a Putin plot) * Guciffer 2.0 (a front for CrowdStrike - this has been proven and is very in the weeds) pretends to be a hacker and releases the first DNC "hacked" material, launching the "Russians hacked the election" narrative. With both these moves, they were trying to get ahead of the WikiLeak drops they knew were coming. Guciffer 2.0 has no connection to WikiLeaks, is not a hacker, and is a proven invention by the DNC subcontractor CrowdStrike. The DNC Leaks began in late June and were published by WikiLeaks in July. G2.0 took credit for this, and per the bogus DNI Clapper and Brennan also pinned the hack on Guciffer despite no forensic evidence to make this case. This is a deflection/game/story being planted on multiple fronts. None of them originate in Moscow - they all originate inside DC. June 20th: Just five days after being hired, without ever going to Russia once, Steele submits the first draft of the dossier. (Which was actually authored by Simpson and Nellie Ohr, CIA, who concocted a loose narrative using elements of the 702 SIGINT they illegally collected on team Trump to tell a damning story for the FISA court approval). Putin nor his cronies have anything to do with this. They haven't had the chance to. July 5th: Steele contacts the FBI (who we now know actually hired Fusion/Steele in the first place to cover their asses) about the dossier - the SAME DAY Clinton is being interviewed. The FBI begins its investigation, and goes 4 months between beginning this and letting Congress know it is investigating, due to the “sensitive nature” of the investigation. It is released in the press on 11/1/16, due to Fusion GPS (Simpson and Steele) going to the press with the fake dossier information, and attempting to influence a presidential election. July-October: Simpson and Steele shop the dossier to press outlets, including Yahoo and the NYT, in an effort to bolster the dossier's import after their FISA application is again denied in late July (using the Papadopoulos investigation as cause wasn't enough). October 21 2016: The FISA (Title I)warrant is approved, turning back on the spigot. The Russian narrative EXPLODES. (FISA warrant is renewed three more times: 1/19/17, 4/19/17, 7/18/17, and expired 10/16/17.) 1 hour ago, Cinga said: I think you missing a renewal, or got the date wrong on the last one. If every 90 days, there should be one in July 2017. Were there 3 after Trump became POTUS? I did miss one! 10/21/16 (Original) 1/19/17 (renewal) 4/19/17 (renewal) 7/18/17 (renewal) Expired 10/16/17 Edited February 4, 2018 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 So, now that the memo is out we can see everything the dishonorable Holder warned us about were in fact false. Why are they lying so much about this? Why are they scared of you having information? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 8 hours ago, TtownBillsFan said: Doc, are you a current or former Democrat just figuring out that you're a relatively smart guy, and have been on the wrong side of things for a long time? That's what I gather from your posts. My political views are all over the place, but I vote Democrat for mostly selfish reasons as their policies have pry disproportionately helped my family compared to most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: My political views are all over the place, but I vote Democrat for mostly selfish reasons as their policies have pry disproportionately helped my family compared to most. This begs the question: Do you believe it's OK to be immoral and take positive actions to do terrible harm to others, so long as it benefits you directly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: This begs the question: Do you believe it's OK to be immoral and take positive actions to do terrible harm to others, so long as it benefits you directly? The way you phrased that question. No. I'm not Bernie Madoff. Edited February 4, 2018 by Doc Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 Flashback to 2013: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/323623-rep-schiff-pushes-bill-to-create-fisa-privacy-advocate Schiff was gravely concerned about FISA abuses... Now he's only concerned about YOU finding out about FISA abuses. Why? What changed between then and now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Flashback to 2013: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/323623-rep-schiff-pushes-bill-to-create-fisa-privacy-advocate Schiff was gravely concerned about FISA abuses... Now he's only concerned about YOU finding out about FISA abuses. Why? What changed between then and now? Political convenience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 2 hours ago, B-Man said: REMINDER: HOW WE GOT HERE by Scott Johnson Despite the best efforts of the shiftless Adam Schiff to keep the lid on the source of the dodgy Steele dossier, we know now that the Clinton presidential campaign paid for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election. Thanks to the reporting of Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes we also know that the Clinton campaign continued to extract value from the dossier after the election. Clinton and her used it to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election. Allen and Parnes revealed: Within 24 hours of her concession speech, [campaign chair John Podesta and manager Robby Mook] assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument. The plan was to push journalists to cover how “Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign,” and it succeeded — as Paul Sperry put it in his excellent New York Post column on the subject — to a fare-thee-well. After the election, coverage of the fabricated scandal of Russian “collusion” was relentless and made a critical contribution to the congressional investigations that followed. When President Trump fired then FBI Director James Comey, Comey had an inspired idea. He would strategically leak memos of his conversations with President Trump to his friend Daniel Richman at Columbia Law School. Richman in turn was to read the memos to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. If all went according to plan, the resulting story was to lead to the appointment of Special Counsel to investigate all things Trump. All went according to plan. Comey is a sophisticated Washington operator who has moved for a long time in rarefied law enforcement circles. He knew roughly everyone in the small world from which the Special Counsel would be drawn. When Rod Rosenstein appointed Comey’s friend and “brother in arms” Robert Mueller as Special Counsel, Comey was home free to ascend Mount Olympus and pronounce his deep thoughts via Twitter. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/02/how-we-got-here-2.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+powerlineblog%2Flivefeed+(Power+Line) The first FISA warrant pre-dated all of this. So, it seems, your propaganda piece is wrong. The FBI and homeland security had been investigating this long before the election. You little BS story here leaves out criminals Flynn, Manafort, Gates and Popadopolous. Mueller is of course above reproach and is conducting a fair and thorough investigation. 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Flashback to 2013: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/323623-rep-schiff-pushes-bill-to-create-fisa-privacy-advocate Schiff was gravely concerned about FISA abuses... Now he's only concerned about YOU finding out about FISA abuses. Why? What changed between then and now? The crap you post! Ok, having a privacy advocate at the court would have changed what for traitor Page? They still would have gotten the warrant The Memo!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 Charge and Response: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_fisa_memo_charge_and_response.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 More news on the memo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 38 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Why? What changed between then and now? Democrats not in the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Democrats not in the White House. Did you read the article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Charge and Response: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_fisa_memo_charge_and_response.pdf Some of those charges are hilarious. "It is irresponsible to release the memo over DOJ and FBI objections." Uh...since when do the DOJ and FBI have authority over the disposition of Congressional documents? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Some of those charges are hilarious. "It is irresponsible to release the memo over DOJ and FBI objections." Uh...since when do the DOJ and FBI have authority over the disposition of Congressional documents? Exactly. High comedy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Hi irony too. "You can't reveal that we've mugged a political opponent of the Dems. It would endanger our ability to do that again." [/azzholesatDOJ&FBI] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 I swear these morons are competing for the most irresponsible farcical comment............ We know that it has been a rough week for Adam Schiff, but he’s really beginning to reach. He told George Stephanopoulos on ABC that as a result of the FISA memo release, people may be less likely to report to the FBI a neighbor who is buying a lot of fertilizer but has no yard. Adam Schiff again today suggesting that the release of the FISA abuse #Memo may lead to a bombing because people will be hesitant now to report neighbors purchasing fertilizer? He did the same thing on Friday with Maddow. https://news.grabien.com/story-schiff-again-suggests-gop-fisa-abuse-memo-may-lead-another-o … Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: I swear these morons are competing for the most irresponsible farcical comment............ We know that it has been a rough week for Adam Schiff, but he’s really beginning to reach. He told George Stephanopoulos on ABC that as a result of the FISA memo release, people may be less likely to report to the FBI a neighbor who is buying a lot of fertilizer but has no yard. Adam Schiff again today suggesting that the release of the FISA abuse #Memo may lead to a bombing because people will be hesitant now to report neighbors purchasing fertilizer? He did the same thing on Friday with Maddow. https://news.grabien.com/story-schiff-again-suggests-gop-fisa-abuse-memo-may-lead-another-o … The !@#$? Someone tell him, you never, never go full gatorman. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: He told George Stephanopoulos on ABC that as a result of the FISA memo release, people may be less likely to report to the FBI a neighbor who is buying a lot of fertilizer but has no yard. #FullofSchiff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts