Jump to content

National Reporters: A Big Move Up the Board Unlikely for Bills


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Although I support a trade up, what would people think of taking a QB at #21 and #22?

 

If you look at the draft as a lottery, then why not buy more QB tickets and hedge your bets?

 

My guess is it would be Jackson and Rudolph. Let them duke it out in camp?

I'd rather trade up if that were going to be the strategy. Now taking a QB like Lamar at 21 and then following up with another QB later in the draft (like Lauletta, White, Litton, etc.)? That I could get on board with. With the number of needs this team has, I'm not sure how I feel about a trade up, but I definitely would not be on board with taking multiple QBs in the 1st round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

And realistically none of them will be as valuable as a good QB prospect. Id take a good QB over 3 to 4 good players at any other positions without question. 

 

The QB position trumps every position BY FAR. 

 

**** look at th Bills. They've actually drafted pretty well outside of th QB position before the drought was broken this past season. Where has it gotten them? 

 

It's really not a hefty price if you land a good QB with that trade up.

 

Outstanding Scott, I agree 100%

 

Look at all those good players now on other teams because we could not afford to keep them. A real good QB you keep as the franchise guy for 10+ years unlike other positions you can replace with a much easier move after the first contract.

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

To be fair, he would be an absolute idiot to come out and say" we will do whatever it takes to get into the Top 5" , and I don't think he is an idiot:lol: !

 

Thank you.  Those of you who believe anything being reported up until the draft are fools.

 

/thread

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, NewEraBills said:

Did Beane say they would not do it or did he simply say, "It's a high price to pay", or something along those lines?  In any case, I've always advocated that if the move up is small move up, but if it takes a kings ransom, we have way too many holes on the team to do that, IF our goal is to continue to build on the success we had this past season.  We'll see what happens.

 

 

Exactly how Whaley ran the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BuffaloDave55 said:

Anyone have a list of QB's taken in 1st round in last 5 to 8 years?  How many are starters?  How many are still in the league?  I would love to see a complete list.  Of those wonder who made trades to get those picks.

I would search that interweb thing...if it's still around

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You either find your QB or you end up unemployed in this league.

 

Who says Terry doesn't want to open the checkbook for Cousins so they can keep all the picks? To me that's the best move of all.

 

You suddenly have your QB and now you also have a ton of draft capital to build your team. Anything but watching Tyrod throw for barely 100 yards a game. The Bills offense is just painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

You either find your QB or you end up unemployed in this league.

 

Who says Terry doesn't want to open the checkbook for Cousins so they can keep all the picks? To me that's the best move of all.

 

You suddenly have your QB and now you also have a ton of draft capital to build your team. Anything but watching Tyrod throw for barely 100 yards a game. The Bills offense is just painful.

 

I have to say, while I tend to lean more towards trading up for a rookie QB than signing Cousins, the idea of having QB "settled" with #21, #22, #53, #56, #95, #117, #149, and #157 does sound appealing. That very well could mean starters at WR/OT/DT/DE/LB and heavy contributors at HB/CB. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Cousins' play will equal the salary he will command.  I prefer moving up for a cost-controlled rookie with franchise qb potential.  If you hit, you are set for fifteen years.  Of course, you may miss and Cousins' established floor is pretty good qb.  I can certainly see the logic of going that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Beane also say you take a guy where you value him? So if you value a guy at top 5 at their position (I believe he means league wide, not in this draft), then you go get him no matter what it costs. I feel like people are just looking at what was said and picking the part they want to emphasize as Beane's position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if the 2 that you value are the top 2, and they are gone before you can even trade for anyone... it doesn't make sense to trade for a guy you view as the 3rd best QB in the draft.  If its true and 5 qb's go in the first like 15 picks (Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield, Allen, and rudolph/jackson) - good players will be available at 21/22. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

So torn on this.

 

A) I was pro-tank for this very reason. Nabbing a top QB was THE imperative for this off-season BUT

 

B) I SO enjoyed the feeling of making the playoffs.

 

:unsure:

 

I would say it was worth it to make the playoffs .

 

They needed to end that long drought 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...