Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, ricojes said:

 

"We look at it from a holistic perspective," Brandon said. "We hired Michael to oversee all of our business analytics as well. He is a crucial part of the mix between marketing and content and the decisions we make in all platforms of our business."

 

I wonder what the football people at OBD are thinking when they hear Brandon refer to football as "content".  That has to be irritating.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

I assume a lot of people do subscribe, though. So why not discuss the article? 

 

Fair enough, you can rip on me for it, but the vast majority of boards I'm on don't allow this for the simple reason that shills for paid sites come in and start topics linking to paid articles. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

Fair enough, you can rip on me for it, but the vast majority of boards I'm on don't allow this for the simple reason that shills for paid sites come in and start topics linking to paid articles. 

 

Yeah the original poster joined 14 years ago so that he could shill for the Buffalo News at this very moment in time. ?

 

You have added nothing to this conversation with your complaints.  Go complain to the Buffalo news if you have an issue. 

Posted
Just now, SDS said:

 

Yeah the original poster joined 14 years ago so that he could shill for the Buffalo News at this very moment in time. ?

 

You have added nothing to this conversation with your complaints.  Go complain to the Buffalo news if you have an issue. 

 

Bro that's not what I said. I said it was their reasoning, not mine. I'm not gonna die on this hill, it's your board, do what you want. FTR I'm not one of the people constantly complaining about the TBN paywall. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

Bro that's not what I said. I said it was their reasoning, not mine. I'm not gonna die on this hill, it's your board, do what you want. FTR I'm not one of the people constantly complaining about the TBN paywall. 

i added key points from the article and changed the title as to not waste too much of the non-BN-subscribers time....

Posted
Just now, ricojes said:

i added key points from the article and changed the title as to not waste too much of the non-BN-subscribers time....

 

Appreciate it. Sorry for coming off like a jagoff, you're well within your rights to post whatever you want and it's not my place to be a prick about it. 

Posted

This is fantastic.  So basically Beane is getting rid of the Bills analytics department because it really sounds they were weren’t offering much to the football side of things.

 

I remember back in 2013 when the Bills canned Chan Gailey.  Russ Brandon called a press conference on New Years Day to announce he was given the title of President - essentially taking the reigns from Ralph officially.  

 

He played to the fan base by talking about how it was a era and that the “new” Bills were going to be analytics driven.  He said the brand was tarnished and announced his plans to start the analytics department for football operations.  At the time this was the hot trend in the NFL, so fans were pumped.  Russ then announced the hiring of the director, Michael Lyons, who I believe worked at Kodak.  

 

But then he hired Doug Marrone, who while a competent coach, was not really one to use data to make decisions on the field.  He made this abundantly clear at his press conferences.  Of course the next coaching hire, Rex Ryan, also was not an analytics guys either

 

It made many wonder “what the hell are the analytic guys doing, if they aren’t that involved with coaches.”  Then a journalist asked Russ and he basically said they were involved with providing analytics for ticket sales on the business side of things.  This was the opposite of what Russ spoke of on New Year’s Day. 

 

I remember being very annoyed, because again, it was another interesting idea that the organization botched....yet again.  Im

not blaming Russ because who knows what happened, but man, another idea that didn’t nearly live up to its hype.

 

So I am all in favor of Beane building a new analytics department.  There was no reason for the department to be housed until football operations if they had little impact on the on field product.  

 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/01/25/bills-axe-analytics-staff/

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Once I saw Marrone's game management decisions, I knew the "analytics department" was a hoax.

.

I blame Russ.

 

"Analytics! We're cutting edge! lol Just kidding, you guys, it's just for ticket sales lol"

 

B9317993548Z.1_20150723175721_000_GSCBDA

 

 

Edited by Wayne Arnold
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

Once I saw Marrone's game management decisions, I knew the "analytics department" was a hoax.

.

I blame Russ.

 

"Analytics! We're cutting edge! lol"

 

B9317993548Z.1_20150723175721_000_GSCBDA

 

Right from the start it seemed bizarre to hire a coach that was anything but analytics-driven.  I think his intentions were good and he was trying be cutting edge, but in the end it really was a hoax, as you put it

Posted
35 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

Once I saw Marrone's game management decisions, I knew the "analytics department" was a hoax.

.

I blame Russ.

 

"Analytics! We're cutting edge! lol Just kidding, you guys, it's just for ticket sales lol"

 

B9317993548Z.1_20150723175721_000_GSCBDA

 

 

 

I don't think Bills fans buy tickets because they're stupid and easily duped.  We're as smart of a fan base as any.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Too bad Russ has not been canned yet... Or, tarred and feathered by Bills' fans. 

 

I swear, that guy has dirt on someone. Or, he is an insanely good ass-suck. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

This sort of thing represents the old Bills, the middling, crap organization that always half-assed it and achieved little in success for its history, save the glorious time around the Superbowl years.

 

I genuinely believe all that stuff is finally behind us and we are now a much more professionally run organization, by people who get it.

 

I still say things are looking up and, in fact, have not looked this good in a generation.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Wayne Arnold said:

Once I saw Marrone's game management decisions, I knew the "analytics department" was a hoax.

.

I blame Russ.

 

"Analytics! We're cutting edge! lol Just kidding, you guys, it's just for ticket sales lol"

 

B9317993548Z.1_20150723175721_000_GSCBDA

 

 

Tell me Russ Brandon doesn't remind you of that creepy overzealous car salesman.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

This sort of thing represents the old Bills, the middling, crap organization that always half-assed it and achieved little in success for its history, save the glorious time around the Superbowl years.

 

I genuinely believe all that stuff is finally behind us and we are now a much more professionally run organization, by people who get it.

 

I still say things are looking up and, in fact, have not looked this good in a generation.

 

 

 

Preach it. I feel the same.

Posted

Analytics are great for games like baseball, where you can keep track of in-depth stats like how a particular batter does against left-handed pitchers or a certain type of pitch.

 

So much of football isn't quantifiable. There are no stats as to whether a receiver ran the correct route on a play or whether a DB blew a coverage or was supposed to get safety help, for example. Others are misleading, such as interceptions or quarterback ratings (interceptions may or may not be the QBs fault, and ratings are only useful to generate a general estimate of efficiency over a long period of time.)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

Analytics are great for games like baseball, where you can keep track of in-depth stats like how a particular batter does against left-handed pitchers or a certain type of pitch.

 

So much of football isn't quantifiable. There are no stats as to whether a receiver ran the correct route on a play or whether a DB blew a coverage or was supposed to get safety help, for example. Others are misleading, such as interceptions or quarterback ratings (interceptions may or may not be the QBs fault, and ratings are only useful to generate a general estimate of efficiency over a long period of time.)

The tape doesn't lie

Posted
22 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Tell me Russ Brandon doesn't remind you of that creepy overzealous car salesman.

I think he looks like that Joel whatever, the creepy TV evangelist.

×
×
  • Create New...