Iron Maiden Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 The over/under for the Bills in 2018 is 7 wins..... http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/22146300/predicting-2018-vegas-win-totals-all-32-nfl-teams-unders-season
26CornerBlitz Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 It's Barnwell's projection, not ESPN as an entity. 2
The Wiz Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Not saying they are right but we have a bunch of question marks going into the off-season. After the draft and FA I'd expect that number to move (not sure if it will be up or down though).
Doc Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 That's assuming they go with Peterman and a rookie QB. If that happens, 7 wins could be right.
Green Lightning Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 It's Barnwell. He still thinks we won't break the playoff drought this year.? 1 7 1
Iron Maiden Posted January 20, 2018 Author Posted January 20, 2018 He does say that we'll eventually end up making a leap forward...after taking a step back in 2018....
Kirby Jackson Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 (edited) I don’t find the number insulting. The Bills had a minus 57 point differential this year. 9 wins is a credit to them. They managed to win games when they had the chance. They also will look look a lot different this year. I suspect that number can move quite a bit in either direction depending on what happens this offseason. Edited January 20, 2018 by Kirby Jackson 1 1
cd1 Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, 4_kidd_4 said: It’s January. again... It's JANUARY - FCOL
NoSaint Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, Doc said: That's assuming they go with Peterman and a rookie QB. If that happens, 7 wins could be right. Its certainly a fair number for a rookie qb
Iron Maiden Posted January 20, 2018 Author Posted January 20, 2018 1 minute ago, cd1 said: again... It's JANUARY - FCOL No one said it was written in stone... It's all in good fun...FCOL.... 1
4merper4mer Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I don’t find the number insulting. The Bills has a minus 57 point differential this year. 9 wins is a credit to them. They managed to win games when they had the chance. They also will look look a lot different this year. I suspect that number can move quite a bit in either direction depending on what happens this offseason. Look back at their predictions. Almost every single year it is the Bills previous year's win total minus two. Don't forget to add one for the Jets, two for the fish and the Pats are projected at 16. 1 1
boyst Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 5 minutes ago, NoSaint said: Its certainly a fair number for a rookie qb Not for Peterman. He would have won 23 games for us as a rookie. 1 1
boater Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Also remember, this forecast was Vegas oriented. Bookies make a line that tries to get equal numbers of people betting each side. Bookies then make money on the transaction cost. In different words: Vegas odds are what the bookies think the betting pool will think. In the end, Vegas odds are usually close to the truth, but sometimes they can be skewed by popular and unpopular teams. I hope I made sense there. 2
Coach Tuesday Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Oh no, some guy at ESPN said something. 1
aceman_16 Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Well to be fair... we have a fluid situation next year. Outside of safety, there is no position on the team that we dont need more talent in and could benefit from a change in. In my opinion, there arent too many teams with the dearth of talent that Bills have.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 26 minutes ago, Iron Maiden said: The over/under for the Bills in 2018 is 7 wins..... http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/22146300/predicting-2018-vegas-win-totals-all-32-nfl-teams-unders-season It's pretty meaningless at this point where many teams have questionmarks at key positions. It's likely based on 1) the Bills lack a QB 2) the Bills have historically lacked willingness to take enough shots and put in enough investment to fix 1) We overachieved for our current roster. 2
Iron Maiden Posted January 20, 2018 Author Posted January 20, 2018 Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said: It's pretty meaningless at this point where many teams have questionmarks at key positions. It's likely based on 1) the Bills lack a QB 2) the Bills have historically lacked willingness to take enough shots and put in enough investment to fix 1) We overachieved for our current roster. That's correct....but nothing says we can't do it again....
ProcessTheTrust Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Anyone know if this guy picked the Jags, Eagles, and Minny to be in the conference championships at this time last year. If so, then I'm worried..otherwise...tell him to shut his trap 1
Recommended Posts