Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I never watched him play much but from looking at his stats I would rather stick with Tyrod.   I guess I just dont see the excitement about him.  Again I did not actually see him play but the output is not that great.

Posted

I have thoughts and I waited for some one else to make a thread before I expressed it. This isn't even me saying that he's an injury risk. 

 

When Kelvin Benjamin came in, he got smacked right on target. I could see the dudes leg vibrate. I seen Tyrod and Peterman get targeted in the head helmet to helmet. At some point some ones gonna go for Teddy's leg. That's all I wanted to say. 

Posted

I'm not that keen on Teddy. I thought he was going to be a very good QB in this league. I remember some scouts claiming Teddy had the film study habits of Peyton Manning. Yet, it that doesn't translate into his stats. Seems to be more of a game manager. This has been the Bills fan bases biggest discontent with Tyrod, won't lose you a game, but won't carry the team on his back to victory. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 1/18/2018 at 7:06 PM, Mr. WEO said:

 

They have been---in other threads.

 

The bottom line--he is a younger, more fragile TT, but infinitely less mobile.

 

 

Expand  

So how is he a younger, less mobile TT?

 

Bridgewater is a pocket passer more inline with the traditional NFL QB. That's NOT TT, at all.

Posted
  On 1/18/2018 at 8:27 PM, Rad Likes The Bills said:

This is not true.  Like at all. Bridgewater is a rhythm pocket passer...

Expand  

The rhythm method isn't working too well for Teddy.

 

He's a 3000 yard 14 TD guy.  We have that in TT, plus TT can score with his feet.

 

  On 1/18/2018 at 8:28 PM, pimp on da' net said:

So how is he a younger, less mobile TT?

 

Bridgewater is a pocket passer more inline with the traditional NFL QB. That's NOT TT, at all.

Expand  

 

Because he's younger and less mobile.  So that leaves the above, as I posted.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 1/18/2018 at 8:27 PM, Rad Likes The Bills said:

This is not true.  Like at all. Bridgewater is a rhythm pocket passer...

Expand  

QB1:

212.1 Pass Yards per Game

6.1 YPA

0.97 TD per Game

3.3% Touchdown %

2.6% INT %

86.3 Passer Rating

5.53 ANY/A

8.9% Sack %

13.7 Rush Yards per Game

4 Rush TD

 

QB2:

201.3 Pass Yards per Game

7.2 YPA

1.16 TD per Game

4.1% Touchdown %

1.3% INT %

92.5 Passer Rating

6.25 ANY/A

9.1% Sack %

35.8 Rush Yards per Game

14 Rush TD

Posted
  On 1/18/2018 at 6:57 PM, John from Hemet said:

So Bridgewater is not under contract with the vikings?

 

Expand  

 

......pretty sure they declined his 5th year option......so right now, they have zero QB's under contract.......think they'll sign Keenum & Bridgewater with Bradford the odd man out.......

Posted (edited)

Bridgewater is crap, no offense.

 

He started every game 2015 for the Vikings, 14 TDs 9 INTs 200 yards average a game and a 88.1 passer rating is nothing special, especially compared to Tyrod's 20 TD's and 4 INTs 215 yard average and 99 passer rating that year.

Edited by paulbills
Posted
  On 1/18/2018 at 6:57 PM, John from Hemet said:

So Bridgewater is not under contract with the vikings?

 

Expand  

All three of Minnesota's QBs (Bradford, Bridgewater and Keenum) are scheduled to become free agents as of March 14 (I think).  Minnesota will certainly try to extend one or two of the three before free agency begins, and let at least one go.  The QBs have to agree to this, of course, but the speculation is that Bradford is the most likely to be let go.  Case Keenum is probably the QB the Vikings will try the hardest to extend, so it is an unknown at this time whether Bridgewater will be available or not.

×
×
  • Create New...