Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh please! Can you imagine that scene with Avenatti grilling a blovating, cry baby Trump! ?

 

Quote

One collateral effect of Mr. Cohen’s plea agreement is that it may allow Michael Avenatti, Ms. Clifford’s lawyer, to proceed with a deposition of Mr. Trump in a lawsuit that Ms. Clifford filed accusing the president of breaking a nondisclosure agreement concerning their affair.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/nyregion/michael-cohen-plea-deal-trump.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
46 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

So her attorney (who is gonna run for president) was on Tucker tonight...
 

 

 

I read something earlier today that Stormy was gonna write a tell all book.   Because it's not like she's held anything back during 2018.  There are going to be more salacious naughty details to make the MSM legs tingle

 

So stay tuned to your approved media outlet.  Whenever your faith may waiver there will always be Stormy details to reinforce the #Resistance

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
11 minutes ago, Doc said:

Who TF is CPL?

 

Avenatti - "Creepy Porn Lawyer."

 

Took me a good while to puzzle it out.  Abbreviating it lessens the impact.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Avenatti - "Creepy Porn Lawyer."

 

Took me a good while to puzzle it out.  Abbreviating it lessens the impact.

 

I thought it was universally known what CPL means. I guess not.

Posted
16 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Well, Creepy Porn Lawyer just cost his client thousands of dollars in fees.

 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5002740-Clifford-v-Trump-Order-Granting-Anti-SLAPP-Motion.html

 

Interesting analysis of a whole host of procedural issues, as well as why Ms. Clifford's suit fails on its face.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Quote

"The Court agrees with Mr. Trump's argument because the tweet in question constitutes 'rhetorical hyperbole' normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. The First Amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement," Otero wrote.

 

Is 'rhetorical hyperbole' anything like 'rhetorical flourish"?

 

Is the judge suggesting Trump = Biden?

×
×
  • Create New...