Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I might agree with signing Bradford if we had an o line good enough for pass protection. As it stands, there's no way we could keep Bradford upright and he'd probably last all of 2 weeks in to the season 

Edited by buffalo2218
Posted
11 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Mario Williams

TO

Charles Clay

Tyrod  Taylor

Kyle Orton

 

You realize those are all terrible examples to your point.

 

Mario Williams was the highest defensive played ever at that point when he signed that contract.

TO was old, and overpaid.

Charles Clay was a restricted free agent, Bills built that contract so Miami couldn't match and no one else wanted to. He took the most money.

Tyrod wanted a chance to start. Other teams wanted him to wait behind a guy. Here he was immediately in a qb competition unlike anywhere else.

Kyle orton... no one wanted !@#$ing Kyle Orton. 

11 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

I have another big problem with him and its that hes just not very good even if he is healthy, which is rarely.

That's a pretty terrible example considering one of those guys DID sign with Buffalo and went on to have an excellent year in social activism.

Did He? In social activism... I'm not hating on him for doing it, I'm just questioning what he has done since he retired and floated the idea of coming back. Understand, to make what you are saying true, these accomplishments have to have taken place from August on. I'll give you all of August because I'm pretty sure you're just making this up.

9 hours ago, John from Hemet said:

Thats right and look where Maclin was come playoff time

 

OOPS Jeremy

 

I'm sure he really would have made a difference in that 10-3 game. Really regretting not getting all those targets.

 

He probably would have been traded for a !@#$ing 7th round pick before the season began. Why would any wr sign with this team?

Posted

Sam Bradhurt is horrible.  My hope is that Teddy Bridgewater becomes available, rather take a risk on him and draft a QB to groom in the background.  

Posted
5 hours ago, buffalo2218 said:

I might agree with signing Bradford if we had an o line good enough for pass protection. As it stands, there's no way we could keep Bradford upright and he'd probably last all of 2 weeks in to the season 

Has a good O-line in Minnesota and still couldn't last 2 weeks

Posted
18 hours ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

Not so much of a bridge, more like a rickety old plank across the water, that may or may not snap in half as you make your way across.  COULD get you safely to the other side or could drown your season half way through...

Effing priceless!!!  ????

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, baskingridgebillsfan said:

two games in 2017 with a very high qb rating and had an outstanding 2016

he is definitely an option and he is a very accurate QB when healthy.

 

If we go SB then we need 2 top OL IMO.. He needs a clean pocket and time

Posted

I like Bradford a lot but his injury history takes him out of the conversation for me.  If he's the best we can do and we draft our heir apparent in the draft so be it.

 

Just don't count on, what over under 6 games?  Availability is a key to Sunday's too.

Posted

  while i would like mayfield, i wouldn't want to pay what it's going to take to go up that high. i would be happy if rudolph fell to us. however, i feel there is going to be quite a boost to this roster this off season....plus we get a couple of guys back healthy.

 

  this defense will better and our oline will improve. i also think they have a very good draft. that being said, i think peterman can get us to 10 + wins. i understand the train of thought concerning the need for a vet presence, but instead of over paying or giving up picks, i think we could be fine with nate in his second year. unless we do sign a big name, he will be our starter.

 

 after another camp and preseason, i really think he will impress. flame away.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Like who for example?

Darnold, Rosen,

Mayfield,Rudolph

1st 2 will cost a bunch to move up that much. The other two will cost A bunch to move up but not as much as the first 2. Do not want Allen or Jackson or a later round QB. I am fine with them spending on a move up to get one of these top 4. 

Edited by xRUSHx
Posted
13 hours ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

You realize those are all terrible examples to your point.

 

Mario Williams was the highest defensive played ever at that point when he signed that contract.

TO was old, and overpaid.

Charles Clay was a restricted free agent, Bills built that contract so Miami couldn't match and no one else wanted to. He took the most money.

Tyrod wanted a chance to start. Other teams wanted him to wait behind a guy. Here he was immediately in a qb competition unlike anywhere else.

Kyle orton... no one wanted !@#$ing Kyle Orton. 

 

I was responding to a post that said FAs NEVER come to Buffalo.

 

Kyle helped us get our first winning season in 10 years.

 

While TO was here, he set the record for longest TD pass in Bills franchise history.

 

 

You wand the best (Mario), you gotta pay him.  How much would he have taken else where since you know we over paid him?

12 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

Orton three for 3000 yards in 12 games that one season. Somehow he was hated by many but he could sling a ball. I didn’t hate him. 

 

Me neither.  I wish he and Coach Moron had stayed another year.

 

8 hours ago, xRUSHx said:

Darnold, Rosen,

Mayfield,Rudolph

1st 2 will cost a bunch to move up that much. The other two will cost A bunch to move up but not as much as the first 2. Do not want Allen or Jackson or a later round QB. I am fine with them spending on a move up to get one of these top 4. 

 

We agree!  I don't want Allen either. We have enough QBs with accuracy issues on the roster already.

×
×
  • Create New...