Logic Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 Below are some great articles about the Erhardt-Perkins offense, which our new offensive coordinator will be running. The first talks about the system in general, with some great diagrams of plays to give examples. The second article talks about Daboll's offense specifically.http://grantland.com/features/how-terminology-erhardt-perkins-system-helped-maintain-dominance-tom-brady-patriots/http://www.al.com/alabamafootball/index.ssf/2017/11/why_alabamas_offense_is_like_a.html "The backbone of the Erhardt-Perkins system is that plays — pass plays in particular — are not organized by a route tree or by calling a single receiver’s route, but by what coaches refer to as “concepts.” Each play has a name, and that name conjures up an image for both the quarterback and the other players on offense. And, most importantly, the concept can be called from almost any formation or set. Who does what changes, but the theory and tactics driving the play do not. “In essence, you’re running the same play,” said Perkins. “You’re just giving them some window-dressing to make it look different.” The biggest advantage of the concept-based system is that it operates from the perspective of the most critical player on offense: the quarterback. In other systems, even if the underlying principles are the exact same, the play and its name might be very different. Rather than juggling all this information in real time, an Erhardt-Perkins quarterback only has to read a given arrangement of receivers. “You can cut down on the plays and get different looks from your formations and who’s in them. It’s easier for the players to learn. It’s easier for the quarterback to learn,” former Patriots offensive coordinator Charlie Weis said back in 2000. “You get different looks without changing his reads. You don’t need an open-ended number of plays.” Let’s look at a play that has long been a staple of the Patriots attack. This is actually two different concepts put together — “ghost/tosser,” which has the Patriots run the ghost concept to one side and the tosser concept to the other. Ghost has the outermost receiver, whoever it is, run a vertical route, one inside receiver run to a depth of roughly eight yards before breaking flat to the outside, and the innermost receiver run immediately to the flat. It’s a form of the “stick” or “turn” concept that essentially every NFL team uses. On the other side, tosser means that the receivers run the double-slant concept. The page below is from the Patriots’ playbook. The theory here is that no matter the formation, there is an outside receiver, an inside receiver, and a middle receiver, and each will be responsible for running his designated route. For the quarterback, this means the play can be run repeatedly, from different formations and with different personnel, all while his read stays effectively the same. Once receivers understand each concept, they only have to know at which position they’re lined up. The personnel and formation might cause the defense to respond differently, but for New England those changes only affect which side Brady prefers or which receiver he expects to be open. This conceptual approach is how the Patriots are able to run the same basic plays, whether spreading the field with four or five receivers or using multiple tight ends and running backs. And from Daboll:"You choose what you want to do and each week based on what the other team does, based on the coverages that they play," he said. "You don't just draw up new stuff every week...We can expand that or contract it or use the things that we think are best based on what the other team plays. I think that's what we've tried to do all year long and that's what gives the players the best chance to execute." After reading these articles and diving into the Erhardt-Perkins offense in general, I feel pretty excited about Buffalo's offensive future. The diversity that the offense offers -- while still using verbiage that is simpler than many other systems -- is enticing. I get the sense that with this offense, and with Daboll's recent experience coaching the college game, we're going to see a much more diverse, modern, interesting offensive attack in Buffalo next year. An attack that adjusts from week to week to exploit opponent's weaknesses and find advantageous personnel matchups. Unlike many on these forums, I think the hire of Daboll was an excellent one and I can't wait to see his offense in action. GO BILLS!!! 26 20
Just Joshin' Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 This is what makes a good site, not one line comments that a person sucks with no supporting facts. 15 2 1
NewEraBills Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 Awesome was looking for something yesterday and couldn't find anything. Thank you sir.
Logic Posted January 15, 2018 Author Posted January 15, 2018 Y'all are both welcome! I am so, so relieved that the Bills didn't pick another dinosaur for OC. I was hoping they'd reach into the college ranks and take someone with a modern offense, and they did! This will help our rookie QB and help drag our passing game into the 21st century. There are two types of offenses in the NFL: Those who embrace modern concepts and college concepts (Eagles, Rams, Patriots, Texans with Watson at QB, Chiefs) and those who are stuck in the past. In 2017, the Bills were the latter. In 2018, I think they'll (FINALLY) be the former! Go Bills!!! 8
Royale with Cheese Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 So maybe Alex Smith is someone they go after strongly with this offense? 4
billspro Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 Looks like a modern passing attack to me. We have been waiting for a good passing game for so long. 1
Logic Posted January 15, 2018 Author Posted January 15, 2018 38 minutes ago, billspro said: Looks like a modern passing attack to me. We have been waiting for a good passing game for so long. Agreed. It would be nice to see a 2018 passing offense rather than a 1998 passing offense. 2
RiotAct Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Logic said: Agreed. It would be nice to see a 2018 passing offense rather than a 1998 passing offense. Greatest Show on Turf... 1
brianthomas Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 thanks for posting this. I read the original article posted & it was quite informative. Gives me hope that Daboll could be a great hire & a step in the right direction. With a simplified & more diverse system, along with a solid draft & offseason acquisitions, I don't think i've ever been more excited for the future as I am right now. GO BILLS! 1 1
Misterbluesky Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 I guess getting a speedster at wr is not on the top of the priority list now.Woods would have been good in this "system".
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 1 hour ago, NewEraBills said: Awesome was looking for something yesterday and couldn't find anything. Thank you sir. Not meaning to pick nits or rain on this thread, but several links (including the first one) were posted and referenced in the original Daboll thread yesterday, along with the suggestion to google 'Ehrhardt Perkins' - which turns up a lot of hits - including these.
NewEraBills Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Not meaning to pick nits or rain on this thread, but several links (including the first one) were posted and referenced in the original Daboll thread yesterday, along with the suggestion to google 'Ehrhardt Perkins' - which turns up a lot of hits - including these. That thread got so big I didn't feel like searching through it and may have missed it in the earlier posts in the thread. Also I was looking for play diagrams and actually a playbook. You generally can find a playbook somewhere. Edited January 15, 2018 by NewEraBills
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said: I guess getting a speedster at wr is not on the top of the priority list now.Woods would have been good in this "system". A speedster can be put to good use in this system. It's also going to depend a bit on which implementation Daboll favors. I would assume by default, the Pat's version which depends on quite precise route running and in-depth knowledge of the playbook by the WR. Gailey's version was more casual: "Beat your man, get to the spot" was his mantra. 1 minute ago, NewEraBills said: That thread got so big I didn't feel like searching through it and may have missed it in the earlier posts in the thread. I understand. It's just a little frustrating when one tries to be a "good netizen" and post information on existing threads instead of fissioning off new ones. 27 minutes ago, RiotAct said: Greatest Show on Turf... Oh Sweet Jesus Please No. I hope you don't know what you're referencing. Edited January 15, 2018 by Hapless Bills Fan 1
Magox Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 So basically we are looking for a bunch of tosser's. 3 2
Just Joshin' Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Not meaning to pick nits or rain on this thread, but several links (including the first one) were posted and referenced in the original Daboll thread yesterday, along with the suggestion to google 'Ehrhardt Perkins' - which turns up a lot of hits - including these. Could not finish - got sick of all the negativity. While we don't need 10 threads on the same topic the hot ones do tend to get too large and too general.
chris heff Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 I’m confused, how is an offense designed by Ray Perkins and Ron Erhardt a modern 2018 NFL offense? 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, Dalton said: Could not finish - got sick of all the negativity. While we don't need 10 threads on the same topic the hot ones do tend to get too large and too general. Fair point.
jr1 Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 the Bills used this multiple times already https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England_Patriots_strategy#NFL_teams_that_used_the_Erhardt-Perkins_offense 2
Buffalo716 Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, chris heff said: I’m confused, how is an offense designed by Ray Perkins and Ron Erhardt a modern 2018 NFL offense? It's not the offense its verbiage . its football, it over a hundred years old. Everybody runs the same plays. what changes from team to team is verbiage and concepts the three three main verbiage offense are the west coast which is a memory offense the Coryel which is a route tree offense and the erhardt/Perkins which is not ran by route tree but by concepts Edited January 15, 2018 by Buffalo716
Recommended Posts