Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

This is the truth. But whatever let's do whatever we can to take away from a team that destroyed us, made it further in the playoffs and lost on a fluke play to point out some conceived positive.

 

The whole basis of the thread is just whacked in my opinion 

The basis , since I started it, is that the guy lost the game for his team because of a fundamentally terrible attempt at a tackle.  And that out DBs did well overall.

 

i am not taking away anything from them.  They had a great year, beat the tar out of us.  But that attempt at a tackle was pitiful and it's something iur DBs did pretty well overall.

Posted
6 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Not about early. About where they can TGT the WRs. DBs are moving their aimpoint lower because of the head shot flags 

Nothing wrong with going low but just need to stay in control

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Not about early. About where they can TGT the WRs. DBs are moving their aimpoint lower because of the head shot flags 

 

the refs had nothing to do with this guys brainfart.  neither did the rulebook.  These guys were mugging the WRs all  night.  

 

You think this guy went to the sideline and thumbed through the rulebook before that play and laid off?

Edited by Mr. WEO
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't think you saw the play based on your comments.  He lowered his head to the point where he could not have even seen the guy he was trying to hit.  He missed him by a mile.

 

I saw the play. It was your typical DB going for a big hit going at the normal hip area. Didnt see the ball high or diggs jump

3 minutes ago, Dadonkadonk said:

Nothing wrong with going low but just need to stay in control

 

True. Its a bad out of control play. But was just explaining why you see the diving more. Wish i would see more Rugby tackles (lead with chest) best way to protect your own head 

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted
Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

I saw the play. It was your typical DB going for a big hit going at the normal hip area. Didnt see the ball high or diggs jump

He didn't see it because his head was so far down he couldn't see anything.

 

Fundamental football: See what you hit

Posted
25 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Saints lose in the last play because a DB lowers his head and throws a shoulder instead of actually tackling a guy.

 

One thing I liked about our D: the DBs played good fundamental football.  Wrapped up on guys.

 

I don’t think so - he has been making good tackles throughout the game.  

 

Looked like he realised he was early and and was trying to avoid him to prevent the DPI.

 

This is why you make DPI a spot foul.  If it was only 15 yards they go for the interference every time.

 

I am sure during the time-out the coaches stressed no PI and just tackle them in bounds.  The ball hung and he got there early - could not have PI - so ducked and in a terribly unlucky play took out his only other defender.

 

I think it was a bad play and be bad luck, but that was not him trying to hit the WR like that.

Posted
Just now, MichFan said:

It wasn't a missed tackle. He got there too early and had to duck to avoid a PI penalty.

Then stop and make the tackle, don't you think.?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

the refs had nothing to do with this guys brainfart.  neither did the rulebook.  These guys were mugging the WRs all  night.  

 

You think this guy went to the sideline and thumbed through the rulebook before that play and laid off?

 

No but do you think these guys havent trained to lower their aimpoints from the past?

Posted
Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

No but do you think these guys havent trained to lower their aimpoints from the past?

 

 

Clearly they have not.  Still tons of headshot every week.  How can you claim otherwise??

Posted
1 minute ago, Rochesterfan said:

 

I don’t think so - he has been making good tackles throughout the game.  

 

Looked like he realised he was early and and was trying to avoid him to prevent the DPI.

 

This is why you make DPI a spot foul.  If it was only 15 yards they go for the interference every time.

 

I am sure during the time-out the coaches stressed no PI and just tackle them in bounds.  The ball hung and he got there early - could not have PI - so ducked and in a terribly unlucky play took out his only other defender.

 

I think it was a bad play and be bad luck, but that was not him trying to hit the WR like that.

I don't agree.  He just lowered his head to the point he. Couldn't see the guy and five at him.  Missed by a mile.  Would have been better to slow up wait and hold the guy up right there.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Then stop and make the tackle, don't you think.?

 

He is running full speed - I don’t think he could just stop.  He realized how early he was and did not want a penalty.

Posted
Just now, Rochesterfan said:

 

He is running full speed - I don’t think he could just stop.  He realized how early he was and did not want a penalty.

I'll have to rewatch and see how fast he was going

Posted
4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

No but do you think these guys havent trained to lower their aimpoints from the past?

 

Yes, but for the opposing players, not their own.

Posted
19 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Just watched the play.  Holy crap, was the safety (who inexplicably ducked like he was trying to dodge a bullet on the streets of New Orleans or something) trying to go for the INT there?  Talk about a brain fart...

I think he was expecting the receiver to head out of bounds and that was his attempt at a tackle.  Problem was he got there just a bit early and the receiver saw daylight.

×
×
  • Create New...