Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I liked Lawson against the run but was disappointed in his pass rush abilities. Hopefully the Bills are able to get a good draft pick in return or do a player swap (like with Indy for Hughes).

Posted (edited)

The 2016 definitely is turning out to be one of the worst ever:

1.)  Shaq Lawson

2.)  Reggie Ragland

3.)  Adolphus Washington

4.)  Cardale Jones

5.)  Jonathan Williams

6.)  Kolby Listenbee, Kevon Seymour

 

Yikes.

Edited by Doc Brown
  • Sad 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

The 2016 definitely is turning out to be one of the worst ever:

1.)  Shaq Lawson

2.)  Reggie Ragland

3.)  Adolphus Washington

4.)  Cardale Jones

5.)  Jonathan Williams

6.)  Kolby Listenbee, Kevon Seymour

 

Yikes.

 

Yikes indeed! All bums.

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Good, it's the right move. Injury prone with very little pass rush abilities. Him and Ragland both failed picks by foot fetish. Hopefully we can find a team that needs a run stopping DE.

 

Rags seems to be working out for K .

 

Gotta get rid of those Rex guys I guess. I was surprised he wasn't traded last off season 

Posted
5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

The 2016 definitely is turning out to be one of the worst ever:

1.)  Shaq Lawson

2.)  Reggie Ragland

3.)  Adolphus Washington

4.)  Cardale Jones

5.)  Jonathan Williams

6.)  Kolby Listenbee, Kevon Seymour

 

Yikes.

Certainly ranks up there with the 2010 draft

Posted
13 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Stupid.  He's cheap and has been healthy. His trade value is nothing and he been solid against the run.  

 

This team needs to stop creating holes and then replacing them.  Of course, everyone will blindly "trust the process" and ignore that the Bills were worse in almost every category besides turnovers.

 

You realize DE has a higher calling than “solid against the run” right?

Posted

I was a big Shaq fan coming out. He was the 10th highest graded player on my board but he has played below my expectations. I think you would be looking at a day 3 pick or a similar non impressive former high pick back for him. I think we missed his run d when he went down he does set the edge well and there were 2 or 3 games where he was dominant against the run this year. But I'm willing to suffer someone picked in the mid rounds next year who is a poorer run defender but gives a higher pass rush upside. 

Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

I was a big Shaq fan coming out. He was the 10th highest graded player on my board but he has played below my expectations. I think you would be looking at a day 3 pick or a similar non impressive former high pick back for him. I think we missed his run d when he went down he does set the edge well and there were 2 or 3 games where he was dominant against the run this year. But I'm willing to suffer someone picked in the mid rounds next year who is a poorer run defender but gives a higher pass rush upside. 

 

You must have someone in mind that fits that profile with a chance to contribute immediately as a pass rusher.  If not, then moving him doesn't make sense to me. 

Posted
7 hours ago, matter2003 said:

Of course...Whaley drafted him...gotta go.

 

Lets get rid of a useful player who is very good against the run just because...

 

...if that is the criterion for evaluating a player, we have the wrong gang in charge.............

Posted
5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

The 2016 definitely is turning out to be one of the worst ever:

1.)  Shaq Lawson

2.)  Reggie Ragland

3.)  Adolphus Washington

4.)  Cardale Jones

5.)  Jonathan Williams

6.)  Kolby Listenbee, Kevon Seymour

 

Yikes.

 

Wow, that does suck

Posted
26 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

You must have someone in mind that fits that profile with a chance to contribute immediately as a pass rusher.  If not, then moving him doesn't make sense to me. 

 

I still have a lot of work to do on the pass rushers this year so I am speaking theoretically at this stage. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

Did you watch any games this year? Hughes had a much greater impact on  games, and of course Hughes played twice as many. Asking a value question between the 2 is not too bright. 

 

9 hours ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

Did you watch any games this year? Hughes had a much greater impact on  games, and of course Hughes played twice as many. Asking a value question between the 2 is not too bright. 

 

9 hours ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

Did you watch any games this year? Hughes had a much greater impact on  games, and of course Hughes played twice as many. Asking a value question between the 2 is not too bright. 

I am talking about Hughes' production to salary ratio compared to Lawson's.  I am not suggesting that Lawson was as good as Hughes.

 

BTW, Hughes is interesting in this conversation given that he was a 1st round pick of the Colts who gave up on him too early.  Bet they wish they had him back.

Edited by OldTimer1960
Posted
7 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

This doesn't really pass the smell test. McDermott's defensive ends have always been on the bigger side. Charles Johnson, Mario Addison, Kony Ealy, Greg Hardy, even going back to Philly and Trent Cole, Brandon Graham. All in that 6-3, 265-270 range. Shaq is a good fit, cheap, and played well when he was in there. 

 

 

The biggest difference is those guys also could get to the passer.  Shaq had 4 sacks this year but one was because he didn't get picked up.  The other was because the QB was trying to escape and lawson tripped him up.  I like Shaq, but he hasn't shown much burst and explosiveness as a pass rusher. I think Coach McD prefers guys that are more of a complete package than one dimensional because Ideally, you need the pocket collapsing on both sides and at least one player collapsing the middle.  Compare Hughes, Davis, and Yarborough's first step to Shaq's as a pass rusher and you'll see a huge distinction between the players in that department.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Mango said:

 

 

I don’t really like this line of thinking. “Bills cut/traded him, he sucks. Do better” 

 

Most of the guys we cut/traded in the last year are starters on playoff teams. It’s not like they leave and are rotational/cut again. 

 

Sammy looking at being franchised.

Woods had a good year.

Darby is playing very well and starting. 

Goodwin had a career year. 

Ragland started in the playoffs. 

 

Cap implications taken into consideration (no Sammy) the Bills would have been a better team this year with Darby, Goodwin, Woods, Ragland, and Seymour on the roster. 

 

This is a really big draft for this FO. We also haven’t done a great job grabbing FA’s with the new FO. (Poyer and Hyde was the previous FO) 

 

This FO came in after free agency had started...they haven't even had a chance to grab anyone through FA.  That's a little ridiculous to say they haven't done a great job grabbing FAs when they haven't had a real chance yet.  Also, you must consider scheme fit when discussing the players above.  Scheme fit is a huge part of it.  Also, most of the players mentioned there had a bunch of injuries when they were here.  You must look at all angles.

Posted
54 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

 

 

BTW, Hughes is interesting in this conversation given that he was a 1st round pick of the Colts who gave up on him too early.  Bet they wish they had him back.

That's very true oldtimer and a very good point. I think that trade was for Kelvin Sheppard so it's not the same as a draft pick but it turned out very good for the Bills. Maybe I wouldn't trade Lawson for less than a mid-fourth. But if the idea is to stockpile picks to get a QB they love I'm all for trading what I would consider an interchangable player.

58 minutes ago, NewEraBills said:

 

 

The biggest difference is those guys also could get to the passer.  Shaq had 4 sacks this year but one was because he didn't get picked up.  The other was because the QB was trying to escape and lawson tripped him up.  I like Shaq, but he hasn't shown much burst and explosiveness as a pass rusher. I think Coach McD prefers guys that are more of a complete package than one dimensional because Ideally, you need the pocket collapsing on both sides and at least one player collapsing the middle.  Compare Hughes, Davis, and Yarborough's first step to Shaq's as a pass rusher and you'll see a huge distinction between the players in that department.

This is a good post. McD has been talking about versatility all year. Versatile to play different positions and versatility within a position. We have to assume McD and Wauffle have  tried to coach up Lawson on certain techniques and he hasn't been able to pick it up. I'm sure the decision is based on more than we as fans see on Sunday. It's what coaches see throughout the week too.

Posted
9 hours ago, Mango said:

 

 

I don’t really like this line of thinking. “Bills cut/traded him, he sucks. Do better” 

 

Most of the guys we cut/traded in the last year are starters on playoff teams. It’s not like they leave and are rotational/cut again. 

 

Sammy looking at being franchised.

Woods had a good year.

Darby is playing very well and starting. 

Goodwin had a career year. 

Ragland started in the playoffs. 

 

Cap implications taken into consideration (no Sammy) the Bills would have been a better team this year with Darby, Goodwin, Woods, Ragland, and Seymour on the roster. 

 

This is a really big draft for this FO. We also haven’t done a great job grabbing FA’s with the new FO. (Poyer and Hyde was the previous FO) 

 

This. I think McBeane has earned some respect, but I really HATE the way they have shed good players because of their schemes. 

×
×
  • Create New...