Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/13/2018 at 9:51 AM, Coach Tuesday said:

 

It kind of is.  The NFL probably needs to move away from complex systems that rely on veteran QBs and depth along the offense.  College has adapted to an easier system that features athletic QBs and can accommodate constant roster cycling.

You mean dumb QBs that only read half the field.

 

Athletic is the nice way of saying dumb.

Posted
2 hours ago, nucci said:

and it's fun to watch

60 to 10 games are fun to watch?

 

I don’t watch most probably because of how they “buy” opponents to play them.   

If you want to play an exhibition game fine.  Just don’t count it as a valid win. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

It'll never work.

 

NFL defenses are too fast and hit too hard.  This will be a backup QB league.  Of course ... that would make the Bills revolutionaries.

Posted
22 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

Simplicity is how the Bills offense was so successful for 2 years.

 

They made the opponent defend the entire field.

 

It was an experiment that they should have stuck with.

 

They'll be looking to upgrade the OC'ing and passing game this off-season.  In the mean time, they made the playoffs with what they had. 

 

4 hours ago, row_33 said:

Nothing I’d enjoy more than Seattle going 2-14 for the next five years after that totally classless display when they were a top team

 

It starts at the top: with Pete Carroll.  And I've hoped they fail since they choked in the SB a couple years ago.

Posted
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

60 to 10 games are fun to watch?

 

I don’t watch most probably because of how they “buy” opponents to play them.   

If you want to play an exhibition game fine.  Just don’t count it as a valid win. 

I meant when top teams play each other. Come on...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, PeterGriffin said:

You mean dumb QBs that only read half the field.

 

Athletic is the nice way of saying dumb.

So “athletic” QBs are dumb? Colin Kaepernick scored a 38 on the wonderlic. Jim Kelly had a 15. Let’s not paint “athletic” QBs all the same.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

So “athletic” QBs are dumb? Colin Kaepernick scored a 38 on the wonderlic. Jim Kelly had a 15. Let’s not paint “athletic” QBs all the same.

I think he means in terms of mentally playing the position.  Lots of athletic guys have struggled with the other half of playing QB.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

I think he means in terms of mentally playing the position.  Lots of athletic guys have struggled with the other half of playing QB.

 

2 hours ago, PeterGriffin said:

You mean dumb QBs that only read half the field.

 

Athletic is the nice way of saying dumb.

Not seeing it that way JMC. 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

Not seeing it that way JMC. 

I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt a little.

 

Keep in mind the context is college QB's.  Athletic, raw QB's are a mainstay.

Edited by jmc12290
Posted
1 minute ago, jmc12290 said:

I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt a little.

 

Keep in mind the context is college QB's.  Athletic, raw QB's are a mainstay.

I know that you are. Chivalry isn’t dead after all. ;)

 

It’s just cringe worthy when someone stereotypes like that. That is why I intentionally used Kaep and Kelly to dismiss it. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

How is it that super Chip tried to  run this in Philly and failed but now these teams want to try it again?

 

 

 

They should totally do this!!

 

It won't be sustainable but I would love the picks acquired in the trade.

 

 

Chip never changed his plays. He was a one trick pony. And too much up tempo led to quick 3 and outs and a tired D.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

By "college style" do they mean having an athletic QB who can't throw a football combined with a run-based offense that is quickly and easily shut down with NFL defensive team speed?
 

That should work really well.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...