Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

so you honestly think dennison did a good job on the year? seriously? SERIOUSLY?

His year wasn't fireable.

 

Enjoy watching a whole new scheme AGAIN.  Can't wait for TT to choke up and down the field for the first 4 weeks and get excused because he's still learning.

1 minute ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

Ok good to know, thanks!

 

You are speaking to the man who posted "insider information" that we were getting rid of McCoy last year and then vanished from the board when it turned out to be total BS. Don't be surprised by anything he says. 

Honestly, you'd have a better chance telling me I'm cute and just asking for my number.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

I thought he had some creative play designs. I thought he had a formula or a system for a specific QB and it wouldn't work because TT was his QB.

 

You may be right.  Rico seems to lack intellectual flexibility.  But maybe he'd be successful with a different offensive roster and - especially - a different QB.

 

But I believe you have to hold people accountable for actual results and not spend too much time on hypotheticals.   Rico took a Top 10 scoring offense and turned it into a suck  machine.  He had to go.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

You may be right.  Rico seems to lack intellectual flexibility.  But maybe he'd be successful with a different offensive roster and - especially - a different QB.

 

But I believe you have to hold people accountable for actual results and not spend too much time on hypotheticals.   Rico took a Top 10 scoring offense and turned it into a suck  machine.  He had to go.

I agree. I was just saying we've had some real bad OC's in the last 18 years.

Posted
1 minute ago, jmc12290 said:

His year wasn't fireable.

 

Enjoy watching a whole new scheme AGAIN.  Can't wait for TT to choke up and down the field for the first 4 weeks and get excused because he's still learning.

Honestly, you'd have a better chance telling me I'm cute and just asking for my number.

 

An apology would be nice. You have a great face, the kind I'd like to see on the side of a TBD milk carton because you've vanished from here, never to be seen again. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

For all those suggesting Chud, he's still employed by the Colts. Has to actually be let go first. 

Technically yes but the Colts will want him to leave on his own. A new HC will want his own guys and if they have to terminate him they have to pay him the rest of his contract. 

Posted
Just now, YoloinOhio said:

Technically yes but the Colts will want him to leave on his own. A new HC will want his own guys and if they have to terminate him they have to pay him the rest of his contract. 

 

I see. I would think if he knows he's wanted around the league, then he'll wait it out and get the money. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

His year wasn't fireable.

 

Enjoy watching a whole new scheme AGAIN.  Can't wait for TT to choke up and down the field for the first 4 weeks and get excused because he's still learning.

Honestly, you'd have a better chance telling me I'm cute and just asking for my number.

 

I cant wait to watch any other scheme but Dennison's, and it wont be TT at QB. He'll be cut in a month.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

His year wasn't fireable.

 

Enjoy watching a whole new scheme AGAIN.  Can't wait for TT to choke up and down the field for the first 4 weeks and get excused because he's still learning.

Honestly, you'd have a better chance telling me I'm cute and just asking for my number.

Which team will TT be choking on? It won’t be Buffalo.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

His year wasn't fireable.

 

Enjoy watching a whole new scheme AGAIN.  Can't wait for TT to choke up and down the field for the first 4 weeks and get excused because he's still learning.

 

his year was ENTIRELY fireable. took the exact same personnel of top 10 scoring offense and it dropped into the basement. i'm so sick of coaches insisting on system over playing to strength of players.

 

and i'm seriously doubting tyrod is back. so don't lump me into any group that is blaming dennison becuz I wanna see taylor back. it is, however, fairly easy to lump you into the group that will blame taylor for anything and everything as the rest of the offense and OC gets a pass. 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Posted
1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Literally every facet of the offense he took over regressed. There wasn't improvement in any category.

 

But what do you mean? Are you saying poor job performance in every statistical category isn't fireable? :wallbash:

Posted
1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I don't think we have to worry at all about this.  The new OC will bring his staff.

 

Not is McD is loyal to Juan. Its McDs staff 

Posted
1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Literally every facet of the offense he took over regressed. There wasn't improvement in any category.

That's true.  But he had Tyrod Taylor at QB, no decent WR's, and a new offensive scheme.  The run game was still 6th in the NFL.  

 

Folks are out here acting crazy.  

3 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

An apology would be nice. You have a great face, the kind I'd like to see on the side of a TBD milk carton because you've vanished from here, never to be seen again. 

If I vanished from here, you might not have the will to live on.  I don't do it for me, I do it for you.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Great....once McDaniels gets a HC job, the Pats hire Dennison and break every offensive record.

That's only because Dennison would do a great job of hiding Brady's weaknesses. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Technically yes but the Colts will want him to leave on his own. A new HC will want his own guys and if they have to terminate him they have to pay him the rest of his contract. 

not that i disagree, but didnt the Colts just deny another team talking to Chud about OC/HC job?..I could be wrong but I thought it was him

×
×
  • Create New...