Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Pallets of cash. Is that a false narrative?

 

Just to add to that: 

 

Pallets of cash - flown in multiple planes and not every one of those planes landed in Iran

 

Where did the other planes land? If you answer that, you will see just how !@#$ed 44 and his team actually are if they decide to go hard on them.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

The pallets of cash was not their money. It was, all told, 1.7 billion in ransom. The 150 billion or so was released assets.

Congrats, you have changed the subject. Feel better? 

 

Trump is still the one under investigation, not the good president 

Posted
1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

I heard that Obama was getting a tailored orange jumpsuit.

 

I didn't think 45 would go after 44. POTUS privilege and all that (it would do unspeakable damage to bring down a former POTUS - that would be the argument against).  

 

I'm rethinking that opinion now.

Posted

That Oprah is the new darling of the Left in terms of a potential Presidential candidate is quite telling. 

 

They have NO bench. The viable talent within the Democrat party is paltry. There are no heavyweights on that side of the isle.

 

All they can do is reeeeeeeeach deep into their bag of identity-politics stereotypes for any possible candidate that can walk and chew gum simultaneously. 

Posted

If the Oprah thing ever gets any traction, there are going to be thousands of people who have "experienced" her who are going to come forward.

Just a nasty, nasty woman.

Posted
7 hours ago, frostbitmic said:

Grabbing Oprah by the kitty ?

I don't think anyone has grabbed Oprah by the kitty for several decades.  More likely she may have grabbed a few.

Posted

I'd rather see a candidate with political experience, especially at the federal level. I don't know why we always want to prop up celebrity candidates. 

Posted

they didn't play the usual drop about Oprah on Howard Stern yesterday.... I'm sure it was running through Fred's and every listener's mind....

 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, sherpa said:

If the Oprah thing ever gets any traction, there are going to be thousands of people who have "experienced" her who are going to come forward.

Just a nasty, nasty woman.

Worse than Hillary already? Or do we have to wait till she is actually running? 

18 hours ago, Nanker said:

That Oprah is the new darling of the Left in terms of a potential Presidential candidate is quite telling. 

 

They have NO bench. The viable talent within the Democrat party is paltry. There are no heavyweights on that side of the isle.

 

All they can do is reeeeeeeeach deep into their bag of identity-politics stereotypes for any possible candidate that can walk and chew gum simultaneously. 

We love her so much because she has a brain, I guess. Trump doesn't. He is just really stupid. His bigotry made him loved and adored by the right, certainly not his brain. 

 

Oprah would just be a better president, simply because she has a working brain. 

Posted

Contrasting every potential candidate with Trump is a fool's errand.

We can do better.

And Oprah's "brain" has never been tested.

How she treats others has been on display for decades though, and it aint good.

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Contrasting every potential candidate with Trump is a fool's errand.

We can do better.

And Oprah's "brain" has never been tested.

How she treats others has been on display for decades though, and it aint good.

 

No, comparing to Trump, you know, the probable opponent, is exactly what you do

Yes, for sure we can do better than Trump

Oprah talks and makes sense and understands things, that makes her brain better than Trumps

Whatever

×
×
  • Create New...