Jump to content

Was Greg Roman actually a good OC?


Klaista2k

Recommended Posts

He was much better than Dennison, but as people are pointing out - he had his flaws as well.  One thing about him, though is that he can get good production out of his offense with plugging in guys that may struggle in other schemes and he works well with what he has.  That's a good trait.  However, he could baffle you with playcalling at times and it seems like plays came in way too late too often, and didn't let the QB make calls at the line.  If you are drafting a guy that has mobility and needs some development Roman wouldn't be a bad guy to have as OC, and I'd swap him out with Dennison in a heartbeat regardless of who the QB is.  However, the Bills need to find someone better than both Roman and Dennison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

He was brilliant with the run game and clueless with the pass game. 

I agree, but at least his run game could occasionally set up the passing game. At times the  running scheme was feared enough to open up deep threats. Dennison’s run scheme and pass scheme are both a mess. It’s really a testament to Shady’s greatness that he’s had a respectable season. The blocking schemes are awful, and many of the run calls are questionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with many above. Phenomenal run designer and exceptional OL knowledge. Mediocre when it comes to in game adjustments, and poor when it came to his approach to preparation (not because he didn't try, but because he tried to do too much). The pass offense wasn't his though, as he's never designed one to my knowledge. It was David Lee and Sanjay Lal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

I liked Greg Roman. I thought he was the fall guy for the last regime, and I liked Schwartz. If you have Schwartz and Roman together you have two good units.

 

I don't like to play this card, but if Russ Brandon is really the reason they got rex that guy should be fired. You think of all the people that have been the fall guy for him it's crazy. 

Everyone loves Russ. He seems kind of tight with Pegs from some of the videos I’ve seen. I’m not claiming that Russ has much power anymore, but he has seemingly worked his way into the good graces of the new ownership. He isn’t going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

Everyone loves Russ. He seems kind of tight with Pegs from some of the videos I’ve seen. I’m not claiming that Russ has much power anymore, but he has seemingly worked his way into the good graces of the new ownership. He isn’t going anywhere. 

 

I know that, and I'm not saying he should. But if you think about all the coaches and players that have turned over because of that dude, he should be fired. I'm speaking in a strictly theoretical sense, not practical.

 

It just seems the guy has politiced to where he got, and it was at the expense of a lot of other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roman had some decent scripted plays but he also didn't call plays to TT's strengths. He also tended to go off script and be stupid. That being said he was better than Dennison who you could defeat quite easily at chess it would seem. Actually I think you defeat Dennison at tic tac toe easily as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roman = great run game designer but his passing schemes are very elementary and easy to defend. On top of that, his playbook is probably the largest in the league. And then you combine that with Rex's defensive playbook and the '15/'16 Bills basically had encyclopedias for playbooks. Coaches always talk about not thinking and playing fast. When your playbook is ginormous and includes multiple variations of the same play being run out of different formations, it makes it that much more difficult for players to digest the information and then apply it to the field, commit it to mental and muscle memory and then play fast. Leslie Frazier proved that this year. He runs a much more simplified/straightforward scheme and for the most part the defense was much better than it was under Rex. They need better talent in the front seven and they could be a very good unit. 

 

Anthony Lynn on the other hand, I feel like he did a pretty good job in 2016 considering he had to use someone else's playbook. He was smart to sit down with the offense and trim down the playbook to the things they did best and make it a little more streamlined, but of course he was limited in installing his own designs because it's pretty difficult to switch offensive (or defensive) styles with the regular season underway. Teams spend all off-season and camp installing/learning/practicing certain schemes, can't just flip everything over to an entirely different system after all that. 

 

That's all I'm asking for in 2018, an OC who will design a system that will maximize what his players are naturally good at. And an OL coach who does the same. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't recall for certain, but wasn't play-action pretty much nonexistant under Roman?  Maybe it was with Hackett.  

 

Boggles the mind when you have the #1 rushing attack but don't use plenty of play-action.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roman is an excellent coordinator in every respect.  He doesn't do the modern throw all the time west coast stuff and so some people he isn't their cup of tea.  He had Alex Smith/ Keapernick  running a high scoring offense and he took Flacco and that gang of cast aways and scored a TD per game more than us.  He is a throw back to the old Raiders where you run the ball, suck them in, and then throw it deep.  Kill them over the middle with the TE.  When you have Taylor, McCoy, and Watkins you get chunk plays and points.  Smith was good at that and it fit Taylor well.   I said a number of times last offseason if you get the right coach on defense he'll make everyone look better.  I'm not going to get into a talent debate again but I will say that a different coach on offense would have done a better job of polishing the turds.  Water under the bridge now.  Hopefully they get a group of coaches and players that works. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Great run game designer.   Great.

 

Anthony Lynn took it to another level.......best Bills offense in 25 years........7th in scoring and fewest turnovers in the SB era thru 15 games in 2016.

 

Dennison wanted to run his modified WCO scheme regardless of it being a poor personnel fit for Tyrod and the lumbering OL and the RAC-deficient WR talent..........that's what he knows how to do because his boss Gary Kubiak showed him.......that's all he's shown he can do.    He's a punt catcher not a real punt returner.

 

I do love all the "a decent QB would have made that play" talk we hear all the time wrt Taylor in Dennison's offense......how could one POSSIBLY tell?   The looks a pocket passer would get would be totally different than Tyrod.   See the Peterman LA game.   That OL is not capable of handling pass rush.......most pocket passers wouldn't even get to see the looks Tyrod did.  

 

When Rex took over the Bills offense was a train wreck.   We knew this.   We knew the OL was very poor.   Eric Wood was coming off two garbage seasons in a row.   We knew they had no QB.   And yet when a coordinator in Roman actually coached up the personnel with scheme/play design they suddenly became the best big play offense in the NFL,  the best rush offense in the NFL and one that didn't turn the ball over.    The importance of coaching to the strengths of your personnel can't be understated.

Edited by BADOLBILZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he is/was.

Tyrod is a coach killer.

Get rid of Tyrod and insert a real QB that doesn’t hold onto the ball for 5+ seconds, throws receivers open and is able to step up in the pocket without scrambling around like a fool and see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...