Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All the smart sports guys on NFL channel and other places say we get rolled over bad.  They say we have the worst QB and our running game will be stuffed.    Jags allowed 7 teams get 300 total yards, but, guess what, they lost 4 of 7.  The smart sports guys say we must get 300+ to have a chance.  But guess what?   Rams and Titans beat them with less than 300.  With 142 and 116 rushing, and just over 100 passing.  Hmmm??  Those passing #s look like our guy.  Hope the coaches have watched those 2 games.  Go Bills!!!

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Steptide said:

I could potentially see this being 9ne of the most boring playoff games ever. I could see a 10-7 finish. 2 good defenses against 2 mediocre offenses 

Hope we get the 10.  Heehee!

Posted
47 minutes ago, Ga boy said:

142 and 116 rushing, and just over 100 passing.  Hmmm??  Those passing #s look like our guy.  Hope the coaches have watched those 2 games.  Go Bills!!!

A voice of reason

Posted

Im just afraid of the hitting on the breaks on offence if/once we get into a lead........this has been a staple of the McD/Dennison play calling planning for most of the season......playoffs are a whole different monster......they need to take some chances or we are doomed!

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
58 minutes ago, Ga boy said:

All the smart sports guys on NFL channel and other places say we get rolled over bad.  They say we have the worst QB and our running game will be stuffed.    Jags allowed 7 teams get 300 total yards, but, guess what, they lost 4 of 7.  The smart sports guys say we must get 300+ to have a chance.  But guess what?   Rams and Titans beat them with less than 300.  With 142 and 116 rushing, and just over 100 passing.  Hmmm??  Those passing #s look like our guy.  Hope the coaches have watched those 2 games.  Go Bills!!!

 

 

 

So you do realize that the Titans (#19) and Rams (#24) are at the bottom half of the sacks allowed for the season?

 

Take a guess where the Bills are ranked in that category... #7.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&role=TM&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_SACKS_ALLOWED

 

Next, take a guess where the Jags are ranked in the Sacks category... #2.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=OPP&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=SACKS&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

 

We will have to have a superhuman effort to win this weekend. Let's be honest...

Posted
19 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

So you do realize that the Titans (#19) and Rams (#24) are at the bottom half of the sacks allowed for the season?

 

Take a guess where the Bills are ranked in that category... #7.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&role=TM&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_SACKS_ALLOWED

 

Next, take a guess where the Jags are ranked in the Sacks category... #2.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=OPP&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=SACKS&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

 

We will have to have a superhuman effort to win this weekend. Let's be honest...

Good stuff.  I can't find how many they had in those 2 games.  Also, we don't have the fastest gun in the west either!!??!  I hope the smart sports guys aren't right.  Go Bills!!!

Posted

Note that the rams are if im not mistaken number 2 or 3 in explosive plays this season. They beat jacksonville with there run game and special teams. They openes the game with a K0 return for a tf and on the very next play fournette went 75 yards to the house. Mcvay was smart he didnt try to pass on a defense at the time that was allowing 2003 patriots pass defense numbers. (56.5 passr rat) he was clearly smarter than pittsburgh who avoided the run game and tried to throw. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Coaches need to look at Seahawk game too.  Wilson hung a big # on them.  TT needs to call him too.  You can't sack what you can't catch.  Go Bills!!!

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ga boy said:

Coaches need to look at Seahawk game too.  Wilson hung a big # on them.  TT needs to call him too.  You can't sack what you can't catch.  Go Bills!!!

 

 

Dude, Taylor was sacked 46 times, good for 3rd in the league, in basically only 14 games.

 

Jags are going to get after it and get some sacks. Jax is second to Pitt with 55 sacks.

 

Tyrod played 7 games against top 14 sack teams and was sacked 24 times in those 7 games. Most being 6 @ Cincy and 6 @ NE. 

 

Oh by the way there was only one win in there against Atlanta.

Edited by PeterGriffin
Posted
3 hours ago, Dadonkadonk said:

Just stop Fournette. Keep him under 70 yards and it is a W

this!   We lost to the Patriots twice not because we couldn't stop Brady...but failed to stop Deion Lewis and Co.  We lost to the Saints not because Brees burned us but Ingram and the rookie did.  We stop the run and force Bortles to make mistakes we will win this game.

Posted
1 hour ago, PeterGriffin said:

Dude, Taylor was sacked 46 times, good for 3rd in the league, in basically only 14 games.

 

Jags are going to get after it and get some sacks. Jax is second to Pitt with 55 sacks.

 

Tyrod played 7 games against top 14 sack teams and was sacked 24 times in those 7 games. Most being 6 @ Cincy and 6 @ NE. 

 

Oh by the way there was only one win in there against Atlanta.

Good stuff PG.  This supports my point that TT better get movin, which was probably what Wilson did to get the W.  TT got sacked b/c they wanted him to be a pocket passer.  When you've got a Maseratti, don't just drive it on the driveway.  Go Bills!!!

Posted
25 minutes ago, Ga boy said:

Good stuff PG.  This supports my point that TT better get movin, which was probably what Wilson did to get the W.  TT got sacked b/c they wanted him to be a pocket passer.  When you've got a Maseratti, don't just drive it on the driveway.  Go Bills!!!

You mean TT was not holding on to the ball too long or ran a lot back wards and then took some ugly sacks instead of throwing it away?

Posted
42 minutes ago, ganesh said:

this!   We lost to the Patriots twice not because we couldn't stop Brady...but failed to stop Deion Lewis and Co.  We lost to the Saints not because Brees burned us but Ingram and the rookie did.  We stop the run and force Bortles to make mistakes we will win this game.

It's the threat of those passing attacks that opens up the running game. The Jags passing attack in nowhere near Brady or Bree's level, if we can stop the run we have a very good chance to win this game.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

It's the threat of those passing attacks that opens up the running game. The Jags passing attack in nowhere near Brady or Bree's level, if we can stop the run we have a very good chance to win this game.

Good point. Hope that reflects in tomorrow's game...Can't wait for it to start.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Ga boy said:

Good stuff PG.  This supports my point that TT better get movin, which was probably what Wilson did to get the W.  TT got sacked b/c they wanted him to be a pocket passer.  When you've got a Maseratti, don't just drive it on the driveway.  Go Bills!!!

Taylor is not a Maserati, in the scope of what you are saying I'm guessing speed = running ability and Suspension and handling = passing ability. That would mean Bree's is a Maserati and Taylor is a dragster.

 

The big fear I have about this game is Taylor going into a shell and having 65 passing yards at the half. 

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Ga boy said:

Hope we get the 10.  Heehee!

 

Me too .THAT would definitely NOT be boring.

17 hours ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

So you do realize that the Titans (#19) and Rams (#24) are at the bottom half of the sacks allowed for the season?

 

Take a guess where the Bills are ranked in that category... #7.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&role=TM&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_SACKS_ALLOWED

 

Next, take a guess where the Jags are ranked in the Sacks category... #2.

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=OPP&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=SACKS&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

 

We will have to have a superhuman effort to win this weekend. Let's be honest...

 

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED

 

You can take all those stats and shove 'em where the sun don't shine.  We'll settle it ON THE FIELD

Edited by reddogblitz
×
×
  • Create New...