Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 12:40 AM, The_Dude said:

I can’t believe (actually I can) he’s going after weed. What a complete imbecile. 

Expand  

That's not what he is doing. U.S. attorneys have been told for sometime now to back off weed prosecutions in states that have legalized it. He has given permission to prosecutors in those states to feel free to go after drug dealers and such.

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 12:54 AM, 3rdnlng said:

That's not what he is doing. U.S. attorneys have been told for sometime now to back off weed prosecutions in states that have legalized it. He has given permission to prosecutors in those states to feel free to go after drug dealers and such.

Expand  

 

I’m sure the people in the canabis industry will feel quite comforted by that. 

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 12:57 AM, The_Dude said:

 

I’m sure the people in the canabis industry will feel quite comforted by that. 

Expand  

Well maybe the state legislatures should have taken this into account when they went against federal law.

Posted

Man, if there was only some way to change federal law. A collection of individuals who could meet in some sort of Congress to deliberate and pass legislation. Perhaps they could be regularly chosen from amongst the people to do such a civic duty and face voter backlash if they do not seek to carry out the will of their constituents.

 

Oh well, !@#$ Sessions and his facist/nazi/misogynistic/racist/blahblahblah acts.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 12:40 AM, The_Dude said:

I can’t believe (actually I can) he’s going after weed. What a complete imbecile. 

Expand  

 

It's the law.  Marijuana is illegal in this country.

 

Sessions, unlike Holder, is doing his job and enforcing the law.  Don't blame Sessions.  He's acting responsibly and enforcing the law.  He didn't write the law.

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 1:16 AM, DC Tom said:

 

It's the law.  Marijuana is illegal in this country.

 

Sessions, unlike Holder, is doing his job and enforcing the law.  Don't blame Sessions.  He's acting responsibly and enforcing the law.  He didn't write the law.

Expand  

Yes ! Round up the 10 million illegals and send them out while we are enforcing laws!!

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 1:16 AM, DC Tom said:

 

It's the law.  Marijuana is illegal in this country.

 

Sessions, unlike Holder, is doing his job and enforcing the law.  Don't blame Sessions.  He's acting responsibly and enforcing the law.  He didn't write the law.

Expand  

 

I blame the SCOTUS for not ruling on it. There’s the real failure. 

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 1:37 AM, baskin said:

Yes ! Round up the 10 million illegals and send them out while we are enforcing laws!!

Expand  

 

Yes.

 

Because IT'LL FORCE CONGRESS TO REFORM THE LAW.

 

That's the thing ****heads like you keep missing.  Arbitrarily deciding to not enforce the law removes any motivation for actually reforming the law, in addition to granting or protecting no rights, misleading people as to their status under the law, and allowing the future enforcement of the law at the same capricious whimsy with which you suspend enforcement.  Process matters.

  On 1/5/2018 at 1:38 AM, The_Dude said:

 

I blame the SCOTUS for not ruling on it. There’s the real failure. 

Expand  

 

It's not SCOTUS's responsibility to rewrite the law, either.  

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 1:44 AM, DC Tom said:

 

Yes.

 

Because IT'LL FORCE CONGRESS TO REFORM THE LAW.

 

That's the thing ****heads like you keep missing.  Arbitrarily deciding to not enforce the law removes any motivation for actually reforming the law, in addition to granting or protecting no rights, misleading people as to their status under the law, and allowing the future enforcement of the law at the same capricious whimsy with which you suspend enforcement.  Process matters.

 

It's not SCOTUS's responsibility to rewrite the law, either.  

Expand  

 

No, but I’d argue that the constitution does not give the government the right to arbitrarily restrict pocession of things that cause no harm. I’d argue, SIR, that the constitution does not give right to prohibit property without worthy cause. I’d argue that. And as the SCOTUS’ role is to defend the constitution I pin the oppression in them. That I do. 

  On 1/5/2018 at 1:50 AM, 3rdnlng said:

So, is it Sessions fault for enforcing the law now?

Expand  

 

This is petty, economically stupid, and the law is unconstitutional. 

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 2:05 AM, The_Dude said:

 

No, but I’d argue that the constitution does not give the government the right to arbitrarily restrict pocession of things that cause no harm. I’d argue, SIR, that the constitution does not give right to prohibit property without worthy cause. I’d argue that. And as the SCOTUS’ role is to defend the constitution I pin the oppression in them. That I do. 

 

This is petty, economically stupid, and the law is unconstitutional. 

Expand  

Should Sessions decide whether or not it is unconstitutional?

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 2:12 AM, 3rdnlng said:

Should Sessions decide whether or not it is unconstitutional?

Expand  

 

Sessions should use common sense. 

 

Ypu our can play devils advocate on this, but if you’re a conservative and libertarian like me you could not look past it. 

 

I believe eve in what this country was supposed to be more than what it is. I strive to make it how it should be. Prohibition once outlawed alcohol; was a man wrong for downing a beer? Don’t be a fool. You’re not on the high ground. And the economic stupidity of your argument makes you look foolish. Unleash a new industry and let the economy prosper and the deficit reduce. But no, you want to be a fool. 

Posted

Sessions was pretty clear from the get-go: He will enforce the laws on the books.

 

If you don't like the laws as written, petition Congress to change them.

Posted
  On 1/5/2018 at 2:22 AM, The_Dude said:

 

Sessions should use common sense. 

 

Ypu our can play devils advocate on this, but if you’re a conservative and libertarian like me you could not look past it. 

 

I believe eve in what this country was supposed to be more than what it is. I strive to make it how it should be. Prohibition once outlawed alcohol; was a man wrong for downing a beer? Don’t be a fool. You’re not on the high ground. And the economic stupidity of your argument makes you look foolish. Unleash a new industry and let the economy prosper and the deficit reduce. But no, you want to be a fool. 

Expand  

Sessions should follow the law. The laws are made by the legislative branch and confirmed by the executive branch. The executive branch doesn't choose the laws that are followed. You call me a fool for desiring that we adhere to the Constitution but you can't see the forest for the trees. Obama decided that he was going to go it alone and ruled by fiat. What has happened to all of his EO's? Now, tell me. Should the Attorney General follow the law or not?

×
×
  • Create New...