buffalo2218 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, suorangefan4 said: You really think the Chargers were playing with even half the intensity in the second half as they were the first? TT had a ton of time to throw in the second half, Peterman was getting the entire pocket collapsed in about a second most plays. Thank you, been trying to point that out 1
SaviorPeterman Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) It still amazes me that so many people are judging NP on the chargers game given the circumstances: - 5th round pick making 1st NFL start - Road game against a hot team (who won 4 in a row after beating the Bills and 6 of their final 7 games) - 1st INT was deflection of a barely used FB in the passing game, also lost Benjamin on the first drive which no doubt changed everything they gameplanned for. - Casey Hayward is among PFF's top graded DB's in the entire NFL (I believe he had 2 of the 5 INT's) - Melvin Ingram and Joey Bosa are 2 of the top 10 DE's in the entire NFL. - We saw TT play against the Chargers and he did absolutely nothing against their defense either except rack up some garbage time stats. Bottom line, it makes no sense to write this young stallion off especially since he already rebounded against the Colts in what was probably a game played among the worst inclement weather conditions in NFL history. Edited January 3, 2018 by SaviorPeterman
Woodman19 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Based on what? Tyrod would have faced that pass rush and put up probably another mediocre performance and lost the job. Peterman would have been able to take advantage of the week secondary in KC and make it easy for McDermott to roll with Peterman from there on out.
nedboy7 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: 56 yards Playoffs. LOL. 1
Rocky Landing Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, suorangefan4 said: You really think the Chargers were playing with even half the intensity in the second half as they were the first? TT had a ton of time to throw in the second half, Peterman was getting the entire pocket collapsed in about a second most plays. Yes, they came out for the second half and played with intensity. Taylor has the ability to escape the pocket and extend plays, and he did that. You, and Buffalo2218, can try to weirdly rewrite history to fit you agenda. But, it just looks silly. Anyone who thinks that Taylor wasn't A LOT better than Peterman in the second half of that game is delusional.
Kirby Jackson Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said: It still amazes me that so many people are judging NP on the chargers game given the circumstances: - 5th round pick making 1st NFL start - Road game against a hot team (who won 4 in a row after beating the Bills and 6 of their final 7 games) - 1st INT was deflection of a barely used FB in the passing game, also lost Benjamin on the first drive which no doubt changed everything they gameplanned for. - Casey Hayward is among PFF's top graded DB's in the entire NFL (I believe he had 2 of the 5 INT's) - Melvin Ingram and Joey Bosa are 2 of the top 10 DE's in the entire NFL. - We saw TT play against the Chargers and he did absolutely nothing against their defense either except rack up some garbage time stats. Bottom line, it makes no sense to write this young stallion off especially since he already rebounded against the Colts in what was probably a game played among the worst inclement weather conditions in NFL history. Gunner scouted him on multiple occasions. He’s seen, as much, or more of NP than just about anyone on this board. He and Blokes didn’t like him at all. The people that have seen him the least like him the most. That’s not good.
26CornerBlitz Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Woodman19 said: Tyrod would have faced that pass rush and put up probably another mediocre performance and lost the job. Peterman would have been able to take advantage of the week secondary in KC and make it easy for McDermott to roll with Peterman from there on out. Peter Pan Pipe Dreaming. Every halfway decent secondary would squat on his short to intermediate routes knowing he can't beat them deep while applying pressure in his face. He'd have been a turnover machine disaster just like he was in LA and the Bills would be home right now. He's a marginal NFL prospect. 1
suorangefan4 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Rocky Landing said: Yes, they came out for the second half and played with intensity. Taylor has the ability to escape the pocket and extend plays, and he did that. You, and Buffalo2218, can try to weirdly rewrite history to fit you agenda. But, it just looks silly. Anyone who thinks that Taylor wasn't A LOT better than Peterman in the second half of that game is delusional. Then in the same sense anyone who thinks Nathan Peterman wasn't better than Tyrod Taylor against the Saints is delusional.
nedboy7 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 So why did coach start TT after those game? Cause he is stupid? Cant evaluate talent? Doesn't care about winning? Thinks TT sucks? Bless me with your wisdom wise sages who can predict games of past and future.
MichFan Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Seems like people are forgetting that Peterman started against the Colts and played okay considering the weather. I'm not advocating for him, just correcting the posts that say he only started one game.
buffalo2218 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said: Yes, they came out for the second half and played with intensity. Taylor has the ability to escape the pocket and extend plays, and he did that. You, and Buffalo2218, can try to weirdly rewrite history to fit you agenda. But, it just looks silly. Anyone who thinks that Taylor wasn't A LOT better than Peterman in the second half of that game is delusional. ANY QB would look elite playing against a team that has a 30 point lead dude. As for trying to rewrite history, that's the last thing I'm doing. In fact, at that point if history serves, Taylor was getting sacked left and right. The O line was getting blown up with Peterman in and you chalk it up to the Bills playing better in the second half? So in the first half, given the amount of times Taylor was sacked before, how would Taylor have fared? Edited January 3, 2018 by buffalo2218
Kelly the Dog Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Actually, this probably is the end of the Peterman Error. If Tyrod is retained, they will undoubtedly still draft a QB high, and only keep two on the active roster. If Tyrod is let go, they will undoubtedly draft a QB high and then undoubtedly sign a veteran backup to help him, and only keep two on the active roster. With all 16 games on the active list this year, Mr. Peterman is probably not eligible for the PS (although I don't know all the newer rules), so maybe he is.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 26 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: 29 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Let's see. He has no poise under pressure, sloppy mechanics,spotty accuracy, marginal arm strength, and makes poor decisions. Yep. All of the above. Tyrod Taylor???
nedboy7 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Remember when Brady threw for 78 yards against the Dolphins in 2008. My god how did they let him start the next game?? Oh and he played the whole game if you were wondering.
GunnerBill Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Tyrod Taylor??? Ha. I am no Tyrod fanboy as you know but it was never in question for me as to who the best Quarterback on this roster was. I knew at some point the Bills would want to get Peterman on the field and see what they had. In one way I am glad they did... because I think they found the answer I always expected. 1
Rocky Landing Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 13 minutes ago, buffalo2218 said: ANY QB would look elite playing against a team that has a 30 point lead dude. As for trying to rewrite history, that's the last thing I'm doing. In fact, at that point if history serves, Taylor was getting sacked left and right. The O line was getting blown up with Peterman in and you chalk it up to the Bills playing better in the second half? So in the first half, given the amount of times Taylor was sacked before, how would Taylor have fared? You're missing the point. The O-line was getting blown up for four quarters. The Bills played better with TT at the helm.
Woodman19 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Remember when Brady threw for 78 yards against the Dolphins in 2008. My god how did they let him start the next game?? Oh and he played the whole game if you were wondering. I suspect he had a much better track record for proficiency in passing than Tyrod at that point.
BillsMedia Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Nobody knows who's call it was. This coach did something no other coach has done for 17 years. He's a keeper.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: Ha. I am no Tyrod fanboy as you know but it was never in question for me as to who the best Quarterback on this roster was. I knew at some point the Bills would want to get Peterman on the field and see what they had. In one way I am glad they did... because I think they found the answer I always expected. I know that. I’ll listen to anyone but the Nate Hater 26. The man is blinded for some reason. Thanks for your insight and great grasp of f sarcasm.
Scott7975 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 45 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said: Yes and hopefully for many years to come. A lot of folks obviously aren't going to be happy when he's the starter next year..... There is zero chance the Bills trot Peterman out as a starter next season unless for injury reasons.
Recommended Posts