Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Two things here. 

 

1) Trump Administration is going to try and ethnically cleanse the country of two hundred thousand Salvadorens. This will not help the rural people that most likely appauld this insidious move. 

 

So now deporting people here illegally is ethnic cleansing?

Posted
3 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

So now deporting people here illegally is ethnic cleansing?

Actually, they are here legally. But, what's the point of throwing them out of the country? Why do it? Is there some pressing non-political need to? 

Posted

Well what group of people would think a billionaire-money-obsessed person would try and help the poor.  

 

It doesnt even pass the laughing test (try to say it without laughing)

Posted

You know any billionaires? 

You might be surprised at what they think and do, and what circles they travel in.

It's not the NYC subway. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Crayola64 said:

I bet Middletown Kentucky is doing great lol.  Democratic conspiracy theory must be hiding it.  

 

The left has a history of using minorities for their vote then working against their best interests. 

 

Case in point. 

 

44 was the country's first black president. An important step for this nation. He had a chance to do real good for minorities - especially the black community.

 

Yet, instead of doing that, he spent his political clout going after conservatives (by abusing the IRS) and Christians while ALSO using his political clout to get the DEA, FBI, and DOJ to lay off Hezbollah(!!!) as they ran drugs, guns, and human trafficking victims into the country. 

 

Where did most of those drugs go? Into minority communities. 

 

But the country's first black president decided his legacy, and securing a nuclear (ransom)deal with Iran was more important than helping his own community. 

 

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/

 

And I'm not a conservative or a republican. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The left has a history of using minorities for their vote then working against their best interests. 

 

Case in point. 

 

44 was the country's first black president. An important step for this nation. He had a chance to do real good for minorities - especially the black community.

 

Yet, instead of doing that, he spent his political clout going after conservatives (by abusing the IRS) and Christians while ALSO using his political clout to get the DEA, FBI, and DOJ to lay off Hezbollah(!!!) as they ran drugs, guns, and human trafficking victims into the country. 

 

Where did most of those drugs go? Into minority communities. 

 

But the country's first black president decided his legacy, and securing a nuclear (ransom)deal with Iran was more important than helping his own community. 

 

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/

 

And I'm not a conservative or a republican. 

Most of the drugs go into minority communities? You are a f'ning idiot 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Most of the drugs go into minority communities? You are a f'ning idiot 

 

Isn't it the Democrats mantra that drug abuse unfairly targets minorities?  You're disagreeing with your own party platform now?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Isn't it the Democrats mantra that drug abuse unfairly targets minorities?  You're disagreeing with your own party platform now?

No, I'm pretty sure the "mantra" is that drug enforcement unfairly targets minorities. Most of the drug abusers are whites, most of those arrested are black. 

 

 

Posted

44, the nation's first black president, was completely comfortable allowing a known enemy to the United States run drugs into poor communities in this country (for years) and build up a lethal cartel - increasing violence and drug abuse in poor and minority communities - because he explicitly decided it was more important to get a nuclear ransom/deal with Iran than it was to help Americans suffering in poverty, violence, and drug abuse. 

 

That's not something a great leader does. It's a slap in the face to those people who supported him the most. 

 

That's inarguable. It's going to be his legacy. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

44, the nation's first black president, was completely comfortable allowing a known enemy to the United States run drugs into poor communities in this country (for years) and build up a lethal cartel - increasing violence and drug abuse in poor and minority communities - because he explicitly decided it was more important to get a nuclear ransom/deal with Iran than it was to help Americans suffering in poverty, violence, and drug abuse. 

 

That's not something a great leader does. It's a slap in the face to those people who supported him the most. 

 

That's inarguable. It's going to be his legacy. 

There is ZERO evidence at all that this stupid situation reached up to any high levels of government at all. Even the article you posted makes it sound like a fight between DEA and CIA. A bureaucratic pillow fight at worst. 

×
×
  • Create New...