ROCCEO Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 espn.com reports..... http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&id=2007638 THis just proves how good the Schobel extension was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Playfair Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 what were the numbers for schobel's K? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 8, 2005 Author Share Posted March 8, 2005 what were the numbers for schobel's K? 267139[/snapback] I believe it was 5 years, 23 million, 6.75 million signing bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Playfair Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 hmm. but the numbers arent that much different. do you believe that schobel is a better player for that money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 8, 2005 Author Share Posted March 8, 2005 hmm. but the numbers arent that much different. do you believe that schobel is a better player for that money? 267147[/snapback] Without a doubt, dont forget Okeafor got to see the Cards, Rams and 49ers twice each last year. If only he signs with the Rams sometime he can play for ever NFC west team at some point in his career. Id say Schobel isa lot more proven talent than Okeafor. PLus in Seattle he got to work opposite Winstrom and in SF he got to work opposite Andre Carter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Looks like the Cards are taking steps to improve on last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Looks like the Cards are taking steps to improve on last year. 267163[/snapback] First time in 50 years you can say that about them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 First time in 50 years you can say that about them... 267165[/snapback] Those late '60's and early '70's teams with Hart and Wilson and Metcalf and Smith were pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Playfair Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/133380 http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/235241 stats are similar, but playing in the pathetic nfc west definately skews this. locking up players before they hit the market is always better......um.....td.....sign nate now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts