Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chicharito said:

The only game that comes to mind where tt took control of a game late was the one in Tennessee. 

and that was after he was terrible the first 3 quarters of the game

Posted

Sit Peterman.  If the Bills have a chance to make the play offs and he loses as a starter, he will not be forgiven by many fans.  Let Taylor start.  If he flames out and they are behind, put Peterman.  That way he does not shoulder the blame in a loss.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Useless, because Peterman will be the backup next week. 

 

My point is he's the starter until they can do better. Hopefuly next year and your every post is an exaggeration. 


You act like Tyrod is some lock, as if the coaching staff hasn't showed us already they're not confident in him (and for good reason). 
 

Posted
1 minute ago, BigDingus said:


You act like Tyrod is some lock, as if the coaching staff hasn't showed us already they're not confident in him (and for good reason). 
 

 

WTH?  Just put the rookie in who was great at LA.  Sure.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nitro said:

Sit Peterman.  If the Bills have a chance to make the play offs and he loses as a starter, he will not be forgiven by many fans.  Let Taylor start.  If he flames out and they are behind, put Peterman.  That way he does not shoulder the blame in a loss.  

He is already being blamed too.  On Redzone he just mentioned if the Bills win next week but the Chargers also win then the Bills are out because of the "Peterman game where they chose to bench Tyrod Taylor"

 

Media is terrible man.

Posted
5 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

WTH?  Just put the rookie in who was great at LA.  Sure.  :lol:

He was good against the Colts in a blizzard

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PeterGriffin said:

He was good against the Colts in a blizzard

Save your breath.   One bad half trumps 3 inneffective seasons by Tentative Take a sack Taylor.  

Copy boy won’t accept any other rational rationale.   

Posted
1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Save your breath.   One bad half trumps 3 inneffective seasons by Tentative Take a sack Taylor.  

Copy boy won’t accept any other rational rationale.   

 

Still a pathetic troll.  Dunkirk Don says hello. You two deserve each other. 

8 minutes ago, PeterGriffin said:

He was good against the Colts in a blizzard

 

Good?  He did throw a couple of nice passes to Benjamin.  At any rate he'll be on the sidelines. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Still a pathetic troll.  Dunkirk Don says hello. You two deserve each other. 

 

Good?  He did throw a couple of nice passes to Benjamin.  At any rate he'll be on the sidelines. 

Yup he was good! Every pass was spot on if you remember correctly! Heck NP even got the win for that game.

Posted
2 hours ago, Koufax said:

 

You are kidding and trolling right?  No 8-7 team with a playoff chance should try to get to 8-8 to pick at 13 instead of 17.

 

News flash for people, despite all the positives that we showed that we could play against the toughest enemy on the road, and the plays that went against us turned around, yet were in the second half with a chance to make some plays and win.  Now we can play meaningful football down to the final snap of the season and have two plausible paths to the playoffs in Kyle Williams' last chance, and you are hoping to lose and get a higher pick?

 

If we had a 14-2 season, this game would have likely been one of the two.  Not stopping Dion Lewis was my big frustration in this game (along with a bunch of little things).

 

Tanking is such an overrated thing by casual fans.  The Astros actually didn't really do it well in MLB, and didn't rely on top picks in the draft (including taking Mark Appel ahead of Kris Bryant with one of their famous #1s?).  So keep thinking that Brown - ing your way to competitiveness is better than building a winning culture and drafting and signing smartly in the off season.

 

Let's play for 9-7 and let the chips fall where they may.  Go Bills.

We lost by 21 points.

Peterman May have actually pulled the trigger on some of those ten to fifteen yard sacks.

Starting a QB against a team he can beat isn’t tanking. It might just be the better move.....

What does TT have to do to get all of you to admit he DOESNT give us a chance.

Without the pick 6 he lost by 4 !!!!! TDs today.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

The Tyrod lovers are not going to be satisfied without anything but Tyrod starting next week. I think Tyrod should start and when he gets 0 to 6 points in the first half we should go to Peterman to salvage the game.

Edited by Wily Dog
spelling
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

The defense played its ass off. 

 

You give Brady a short field and what else should one expect?

 

what did Romo say on the first long drive?   That is how you defeat Brady. Keep him off of the field. 

Tayor crashes and burns late in games.  How people don’t see that is astounding!!!!

 

 

I didn't say Taylor played well in the 2nd half, but to copy your last sentence and apply it to the defense giving up points on 6 straight drives... how people don't see that is astounding. Career high in rushing for Lewis.

Posted
Just now, klos63 said:

I didn't say Taylor played well in the 2nd half, but to copy your last sentence and apply it to the defense giving up points on 6 straight drives... how people don't see that is astounding. Career high in rushing for Lewis.

 

He's a troll who knows nothing about football. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

The Lost Boys still believe in Peter Pan?  Now unfortuNATE :blink:

 

 

We've seen 1 quarter in one game, 1 half in another, and 1 half in one more game from him. That's it. AND he's a rookie.

To act like we know what we have with him is hilarious. People still try to campaign for Tyrod as if he'll somehow change. He's a 7 year veteran with 3 years of starting experience & the only changes he's made are for the worse. What could you possibly find appealing about that?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, BigDingus said:

 

We've seen 1 quarter in one game, 1 half in another, and 1 half in one more game from him. That's it. AND he's a rookie.

To act like we know what we have with him is hilarious. People still try to campaign for Tyrod as if he'll somehow change. He's a 7 year veteran with 3 years of starting experience & the only changes he's made are for the worse. What could you possibly find appealing about that?

We tried the Peterman thing, it didn't work and this , once again, isn't the time to try again. They'll address the QB situation in the offseason. Until then, it's Taylor's team for better or worse.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, BigDingus said:

 

We've seen 1 quarter in one game, 1 half in another, and 1 half in one more game from him. That's it. AND he's a rookie.

To act like we know what we have with him is hilarious. People still try to campaign for Tyrod as if he'll somehow change. He's a 7 year veteran with 3 years of starting experience & the only changes he's made are for the worse. What could you possibly find appealing about that?

 

Who does that?  He's the best QB on the team. Period. So he starts.    

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Yeezus said:

no one !@#$ing cares anymore

 

just lose, get a better draft spot and find your !@#$ing franchise QB

 

i'm so sick of watching journeyman QB's on this team for !@#$s sake

Spoken like a true Buffalo fan...let's just keep losing...it's so much fun

Posted
9 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Who does that?  He's the best QB on the team. Period. So he starts.    

Your certainty in this, coupled by your lack of evidence to the contrary is disquieting.

 

×
×
  • Create New...