Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

It might be nit picky but there is no way to call California early.  In fact I'm calling California for the democrat in 2044 right now.  

 

Due to the civil war, there won't be an election in 2044.  Not in California. 

Posted
9 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

It might be nit picky but there is no way to call California early.  In fact I'm calling California for the democrat in 2044 right now.  

 

Only if Nixon or Reagan run again. 

 

Actually the only 2 national political figures so far from (or associated) with the state for either party?

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Due to the civil war, there won't be an election in 2044.  Not in California. 

 

There will be, and you'll have a choice of multiple parties: Democrats, Social Democrats, Socialists, Progressives, and Greens.  True Democracy for the people!

 

And Pelosi's Illuminati lizard HAARP clone will be running the place...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/22/2019 at 8:12 PM, Crayola64 said:

Yea I’m on board with both being ridiculous, just curious what others thought!

 

I think the important thing is to see which outlets acknowledge their bias. Bias exists, one way or the other. Some acknowledge it, and then some say it doesn't exist and we're only suggesting it does because we support Trump, blah blah blah, etc. 

 

I think Fox News is biased to the right, and usually I like to get info from multiple sides. I typically will read three or four hard left takes, and the see how Fox spins it in order to try and find the middle. Even then, I am sure there is plenty missing. 

 

In my experience, Fox does a better job admitting bias than others, but a large part of that is that "their guy" is in office now. Some of their stuff on Obama was a bit over the top for my liking. 

 

CNN is just plain off the rails stupid these days. 

 

 

Also, for what it's worth- you seem to be a liberal who enjoys real conversation and dialogue- that's rare around here... Keep up the good work!

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by whatdrought
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

I think the important thing is to see which outlets acknowledge their bias. Bias exists, one way or the other. Some acknowledge it, and then some say it doesn't exist and we're only suggesting it does because we support Trump, blah blah blah, etc. 

 

I think Fox News is biased to the right, and usually I like to get info from multiple sides. I typically will read three or four hard left takes, and the see how Fox spins it in order to try and find the middle. Even then, I am sure there is plenty missing. 

 

In my experience, Fox does a better job admitting bias than others, but a large part of that is that "their guy" is in office now. Some of their stuff on Obama was a bit over the top for my liking. 

 

CNN is just plain off the rails stupid these days. 

 

 

Also, for what it's worth- you seem to be a liberal who enjoys real conversation and dialogue- that's rare around here... Keep up the good work!

 

 

 

 

 

Separate Fox New's news from Fox New's commentary. Their actual news people are fairly unbiased. The other MSM intermingle their commentary with the news so it's nearly all biased. We all know what Sean Hannity and Rachel Maddow stand for but can you name a news anchor that is as fair minded as Bret Baier?

Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Separate Fox New's news from Fox New's commentary. Their actual news people are fairly unbiased. The other MSM intermingle their commentary with the news so it's nearly all biased. We all know what Sean Hannity and Rachel Maddow stand for but can you name a news anchor that is as fair minded as Bret Baier?

 

Chris Wallace is 2/3 against the GOP for balance

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, whatdrought said:

 

 

Quote

 

Cover blurbs:

 

"A masterpiece"—CNN's Jim Acosta

 

"Brave, revealing"—CNN's Jim Acosta

 

"Handsome, excellently maintained eyebrows"—CNN's Jim Acosta

 

 

 

 

 

 

.What a laughable premise. No one stops journalists from telling the truth and they are in absolutely no danger when doing so.

 

It’s such a dangerous time to tell the truth in America that Jim Acosta is going to write a book about how dangerous a time it is to tell the truth in America.

 

Posted
On 1/22/2019 at 8:25 PM, LABillzFan said:

 

Here's the thing that's hanging you up: CNN was never 'liberal media.' CNN was always the more middle of the road news. It was always live when when sh!t hit the fan and you needed answers in real time, because they were airing 24/7 and you didn't want to wait for Dan Rather to get out of make up.

 

That's not CNN now. Nor CBS, ABC, NBC, etc.

 

Fox tilts heavily right from an opinion standpoint, but when it comes to reporting news, no one anywhere competes with Bret Baier.

 

5

I tend to watch Fox News more than any other news, and you know my views on Trump. I agree they are pretty balanced..I  do like CBS's first 19 minutes of the CBS Morning News. I think that is also pretty straight down the middle..ole Nora hates BS on both sides, and when there is a guest there she tends to call BS on both sides. PLus, she kinda smokin.

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.What a laughable premise. No one stops journalists from telling the truth and they are in absolutely no danger when doing so.

 

It’s such a dangerous time to tell the truth in America that Jim Acosta is going to write a book about how dangerous a time it is to tell the truth in America.

 

 

So is Acosta going to have book signings, or is he just going to stand in bookstores and argue with people?

Posted
On 1/23/2019 at 4:18 PM, DC Tom said:

 

There will be, and you'll have a choice of multiple parties: Democrats, Social Democrats, Socialists, Progressives, and Greens.  True Democracy for the people!

 

And Pelosi's Illuminati lizard HAARP clone will be running the place...

And by that time Jerry Brown will be eligible to run again 

Posted
24 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

funny, as I was watching CBS this morning, they showed that clip from CNN...and I questioned too how the fudge did CNN know to be there pre dawn??? I hate Trump and all, but that was just pretty blatant to me.

 

a three-ring circus

 

not as bad as the media landing 2 hours ahead of US troops in Central America once

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Foxx said:

interesting. what would be the gain?

 

It's a WAG but it fits his personality profile of being a complete and total attention *****. It builds up his reputation (it took a tactical team to arrest me!) which he'll bank on for the last chapters of his life as he sells books and does interviews on InfoWars. He's known he was going to be indicted for three months, most (like me) expected it to happen before Christmas, and he was just on CNN the day before for a panel. 

 

It's my pre-coffee, pre-awake, "outside the box" thought of the morning :) 

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...