CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point

[njbuff]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

THIS IS CNN: 

 

CNN’s Jake Tapper Was a Willing #Obamagate Co-Conspirator.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even an idiot like me knew this was public knowledge.

 

But no one cares that Fake Jake was/is a co-conspirator.

 

Maybe Durham and Barr can change that.

[Buffalo_Gal]

A CNN reporter virtual signaling? Nawww
 

 

[Tiberius]

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

TO BE FAIR, HE’S A HACK:

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

?Let's see the unredacted Mueller Report ?

What If Fox News Covered Trump the Way It Covered Obama?

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Orlando Buffalo]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

 

 

Tibs I am not on Twitter and I am curious what the smear is, and who it is against if not Biden? I have seen many reference this from Tapper but no indication of what he means.

53 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The CNN lady is even funnier when you realize she mentions the 6 seconds of video as if she put the mask back on after the video. Her combo of maximizing the damage of coronavirus while minimizing her actions that help cause the problem is truly special.

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Tibs I am not on Twitter and I am curious what the smear is, and who it is against if not Biden? I have seen many reference this from Tapper but no indication of what he means.

The CNN lady is even funnier when you realize she mentions the 6 seconds of video as if she put the mask back on after the video. Her combo of maximizing the damage of coronavirus while minimizing her actions that help cause the problem is truly special.

I don’t think it’s anything, so far the biggest crime in history isn’t really defined, it’s more just “Obama bad” 

[Deranged Rhino]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I don’t think it’s anything, so far the biggest crime in history isn’t really defined, it’s more just “Obama bad” 

 

It has been defined: seditious conspiracy. 

[Tiberius]

14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It has been defined: seditious conspiracy. 

What is the smoking gun? 

[Cinga]

15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It has been defined: seditious conspiracy. 

 

Just to help Tibs understand....  ?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

[Deranged Rhino]

25 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What is the smoking gun? 

There are about a dozen to date. With much more to come. 

[BillStime]

13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

There are about a dozen to date. With much more to come. 

Why won’t Barr investigate Obama Biden?

 

[BuffaloHokie13]

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why won’t Barr investigate Obama Biden?

Did he say they won't? Or did he say he doesn't expect to as they are not the focus of the Durham investigation?

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why won’t Barr investigate Obama Biden?

 

 

Because of the terrible precedent it would set. We don't go after ex-presidents criminally in this country, because doing so would make it impossible for any future president to govern.

[B-Man]

‘Was accosted by trespasser’: CNN’s Chris Cuomo says it is a lie that he broke quarantine on Easter Sunday

 

 

 

 

 

For those with poor reading comprehension;

 

"As to President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement, based on the information I have today, I don't expect Mr. Durham's work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man," Barr said.

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Did he say they won't? Or did he say he doesn't expect to as they are not the focus of the Durham investigation?

 

I've never expected 44 to get caught up in the criminal elements of these prosecutions, for the reason stated above. But what will happen is that Barr will perp walk a dozen or more of 44's lieutenants and cabinet officials into court with can't-miss-cases that will shine a light on the true Obama legacy. 44 will be destroyed in the court of public opinion, and the future history written about him will be deeply unkind (and entirely deserved). 

 

But you can't go after former presidents with the DOJ due to the precedent it would set. The ones who are pushing that, largely about Trump, are the very same people who sought to undermine and subvert our republic by weaponizing the intelligence services for political purposes. They're enemies of this country and what it stands for. The fact Barr made this comment today is reassuring, or should be.  

 

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Because of the terrible precedent it would set. We don't go after ex-presidents criminally in this country, because doing so would make it impossible for any future president to govern.

So no lock him up chants at his cesspool rallies?

[Taro T]

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I've never expected 44 to get caught up in the criminal elements of these prosecutions, for the reason stated above. But what will happen is that Barr will perp walk a dozen or more of 44's lieutenants and cabinet officials into court with can't-miss-cases that will shine a light on the true Obama legacy. 44 will be destroyed in the court of public opinion, and the future history written about him will be deeply unkind (and entirely deserved). 

 

But you can't go after former presidents with the DOJ due to the precedent it would set. The ones who are pushing that, largely about Trump, are the very same people who sought to undermine and subvert our republic by weaponizing the intelligence services for political purposes. They're enemies of this country and what it stands for. The fact Barr made this comment today is reassuring, or should be.  

 

 

The issue with going after former presidents is if they expect to be harrassed/ jailed for doing their jobs we will never see a peaceful transition of power again.  It's amazing that we've done it flawlessly 43 times. Going after former presidents will guarantee we don't make it to 50.

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

So no lock him up chants at his cesspool rallies?

 

They won't need to lock him up. He won't be able to walk down the street when they're done with him. 

Just now, Taro T said:

 

The issue with going after former presidents is if they expect to be harrassed/ jailed for doing their jobs we will never see a peaceful transition of power again.  It's amazing that we've done it flawlessly 43 times. Going after former presidents will guarantee we don't make it to 50.

 

100%