reddogblitz Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 14 hours ago, GreggTX said: He's better than Taylor, but not that much. Let's try to get our next HOF QB before settling for a guy that'maybe just above avg. Why can't we do both?
SaviorPeterman Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 Barnwell sums it up perfectly here: Quote I get the feeling a lot of teams might see Taylor as a backup plan, which means his market might not materialize quickly. It's difficult to find an obvious fit for Taylor as an unquestioned starter, which means he might have to settle for a job as a bridge to a younger starter in waiting (in Cleveland or Kansas City), or compete for the No. 1 job with an inferior option for a team that doesn't have a long-term solution (like the Jets or Broncos). Again nothing against TT, he's just not as good as the numbers indicate and most realize that. But as long as he's willing to be a backup again or understand he'll be on a very short leash as a starter for a team like the Browns he'll certainly have options.
No Cease Fires Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 1 hour ago, SaviorPeterman said: Barnwell sums it up perfectly here: Again nothing against TT, he's just not as good as the numbers indicate and most realize that. That wasn't Barnwell's point at all, though.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 15 hours ago, Foreigner said: Hard to see amy big time veteran QB wanting to come here with the quality of WRs to throw to. ....but they're mostly INACTIVE on Sundays and hardly battle tested.......
Recommended Posts