Gugny Posted December 25, 2017 Posted December 25, 2017 Just now, 4merper4mer said: Ever heard of Cooks? James? Same play, same arbiter, different results. I've heard of Cooks and my name isn't James.
/dev/null Posted December 25, 2017 Posted December 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, Gugny said: I've heard of Cooks and my name isn't James. Surely you can't be serious James
Big Turk Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 43 minutes ago, Gugny said: These threads are getting ridiculous. Yeah people have no real clue how the NFL works for the most part and dont bother trying to learn before postimg nonsensical stuff.
fridge Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 It would be one of the greatest stories in all of sports if Aaron Rogers was claimed by the Browns after an administrative error and brought a championship to Cleveland.
Koko78 Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 Green Bay will simply say he re-aggravated the injured collarbone and could not play any more this season without risking further injury. I'm quite certain the team doctor will back that up, if he likes his job. Rodgers is not being released no matter how much other teams whine.
nucci Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 1 hour ago, NoSaint said: Teams IR guys for minor stuff down the stretch all the time. They aren’t forcing a team to release a HOF qb over it. Not what is being questioned here. He just came off of IR...to go back on he has to have a new injury. That's the rule
NoSaint Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 1 hour ago, nucci said: Not what is being questioned here. He just came off of IR...to go back on he has to have a new injury. That's the rule And as I said, I think it’s be pretty easy to find about a half dozen things wrong with his body that haven’t been reported and could be “new issues” if push ever came to shove on this
4merper4mer Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 The weird thing is that they had been eliminated. Why even bother with a 53rd player?
Heavy Kevi Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 "could be forced to release"? Seems about as likely as meeting a unicorn minotaur, and him asking you for a light.
apuszczalowski Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 Would he have to go through waivers if he is forced to be released? If not he would just re sign with GB. If he had to go through waivers he would probably just retire then go there. The NFL doesn't like the Browns enough to gift them Rogers, and I doubt they want a big name like Rogers retiring too soon
26CornerBlitz Posted December 26, 2017 Author Posted December 26, 2017 On 12/24/2017 at 10:29 AM, 26CornerBlitz said: He'd be subject to waivers. 4 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said: Would he have to go through waivers if he is forced to be released? If not he would just re sign with GB. If he had to go through waivers he would probably just retire then go there. The NFL doesn't like the Browns enough to gift them Rogers, and I doubt they want a big name like Rogers retiring too soon
Recommended Posts